Eric Olson's Bioimaging paper summary
Please click here.
Answers to discussion questions are under the "Continue Reading" link
Answers to comment questions are below. For whatever reason, I cannot post these as comments in the blog thread so I am doing it this way.
1. The proportionality constants were determined using a fluorescence microscope. The overall details are sparse in the supplementary information. My understanding is that they performed measurements varying the concentration of both ions and measuring the fluorescence intensity. The proportionality factors were then determined using nonlinear regression with three variables.
2. If one wished to determine the association and dissociation rates, a feasible method is immobilize the reporter onto the walls of a flow-cell and pass solutions of known concentrations through the cell. Much like the k and k-1 determination done with SPR, an ion-free solution could be passed through the cell followed by solution loaded with a known concentration of analyte. Once saturation is reached, analyte-free solution can be again passed through the cell. Using nonlinear fitting, you could determine the constants.
With regards to Nic's question, cleavage of the ester bonds is spontaneous in the intracellular matrix. Going back to undergraduate organic chemistry, many ester bonds are cleaved spontaneously in aqueous solution. This cleavage must take a reasonable amount of time, otherwise loading of the cell would not be possible. Once introduced into the sample, a 15 minute wait time was used to ensure relatively complete cleavage of the ester.
Comments
1- I was looking at equation 1 in the paper, how do they determine the proportionality constant? Could you look at the supplementary material and explain to the rest of the class.
2- How could one determine the k and k-1 for the dual probe?
Posted by: Edgar Arriaga | May 8, 2008 03:59 PM
Eric, maybe I missed this during your presentation...but how does the ester-derivatized form of KCM-1 get converted back to the fluorescent form of KCM-1 inside the cell?
Posted by: Nic Frost | May 9, 2008 02:18 PM
I have kind of a follow up to Nic's question, how efficient is the conversion from the ester derivative back to the fluorescent form? Does a high concentration of the ester derivative have to be loaded before you can see any appreciable signal?
Posted by: Craig Bishop | May 9, 2008 07:32 PM