People are outraged! What this time, right?
People are outraged that the Lassie in the newest Lassie movie, is not a descendant of the original Lassie. Oh, who the hell cares?
Every Lassie, aside from this one, in every Lassie movie or television show ever made, has been a descendant of the first Lassie. Yes, it's a neat little factoid, but is it really worthy of outrage when the reign ends? It is clearly a case of canine nepotism... and it's all for PR's sake. So really, who the hell cares?
Posted by ause0007 at June 6, 2005 2:13 PMok, so that is basically like saying that every actor who does a remake of a movie has to be a direct descendent of the original actor to play the part. Yeah, not really too practical.
Posted by: Dawn at June 6, 2005 2:45 PMMy dog has been protesting this unfair treatment for years.
Posted by: Kyle Larson at June 6, 2005 3:08 PMI have a Collie, so who knows if he's related...too bad he's a mixed breed with German Shepherd and Rott....I guess that makes him less desirable to the snooty dog people. Oh well, he's not much of an actor anyway.
Posted by: JenT at June 7, 2005 3:17 PM