Divide and Conquer- 3 questions to determine arguement

Vote 0 Votes

1. Based on the gathered information from our annotated bibliography, in order to communicate the significance of the brief success of Holberg, and his lasting influence on the Scandinavian theatre and Danish society, we have sufficient information that includes biographical information of the playwright, historical information on the Enlightenment period and the societal lack of development faced in Holberg's society, and analysis of the comedies he wrote. The biographical information includes that of Holberg's origins as a writer, and how he became involved in the theatrical presentations. Historical information, so far, touches briefly on the enlightenment period, including concepts and ideas presented at the time, such as the push for individual voices and thoughts. The monarchy and the Danish King are also included, and this information could be used to introduce the societal characteristics that further more explain the dire need for change that Holberg ultimately presented. The analysis of the comedies are also critical towards our argument in the sense that we'll have sufficient evidence as to not only how Holberg communicated his ideas, but WHY they worked and remained a lasting influence.

2. A general overview of our argument is that Holberg was the first person who used his plays to give a nationalistic sense of power to the Scandinavian people by critiquing authority (therefore the monarchy) and by writing about themes that were relevant to the Scandinavian audience. We will also introduce the counterargument that Holberg was not a true "power to the people" supporter, given that he was also very closely allied with the monarchy. However, we have sufficient evidence to argue against this by pointing out that Holberg needed to the monarchy's support in order to produce his plays. The extreme exaggeration of his characters and plots was used to hide his critique of the monarchy so that he could continue to produce politically infused work. This is set against a historical backdrop of a time frame in which serfdom had been lifted, though it would be reintroduced a short 30 years later. Holberg is a product of these times. The fact of the matter being that while, technically the peasantry was no longer "enserfed" the peasantry was by no means completely free either. Thus Holberg, and by association his writings and birth of a true Danish theatre, fit well amidst a time in which the monarch, Frederick IV made attempts towards an enlightenment era political philosophy, but the realities of their world did not yet allow it to function in practice.

3. We have only twenty minutes to teach the class about the rise and fall of the Danish Comedy. This presents a problem because there are countless variables which contributed to it. Thus, we must pick and choose which variables we wish to discuss in order to most completely and effectively present our findings. In order to do this we are creating a thesis like argument around which to frame the discussion, addressing the variables which pertain most to our argument and merely skim over the cornucopia of additional information. For example: the lives and personalities of the three kings which ruled during Holberg's life had a great impact upon the society and thusly Holberg's work, especially given his reliance upon them. However, we will probably only be able to mention the kings by name rather than elaborating upon their personal affairs and their affect upon society. We will have to touch upon Holberg's international travels as they were critical to the cosmopolitan perspectives which influenced him, but we may not have time to discuss how each of the places he went specifically influenced him. Our scope is narrow enough that most of what we will have to omit will not be key information to the Rise and Fall of The Danish Comedy. Twenty minutes should suffice to effectively relate the truly crucial contextual aspects of this time and place in theater history.


| Leave a comment

Guys, I've consolidated all of the various write ups and group contributions to here. One post...incorporating the post on question 3, which was in another post. This is just for the simplicity of the finding all the questions for Will and Bryan.

Hi all,

Great work on this and thanks, Eric, for the consolidation. Some thoughts:

Question 1 - It's looking like this might be a little too much to cover within the brief twenty minutes, but I'm not positive. It will all be about how you arrange the information - one thing to consider is how you might quickly set up a frame that describes the most necessary information to understanding the time period, and then try to place Holberg into that frame to show where he and his work fit in. This would allow you to hit a lot of the different areas you want to, but you could do it quickly and not feel bad for not dwelling or explaining the information more deeply.

Question 2 - I'm really fascinated by the details that you're explaining here, and I can't wait to hear more about this. The description of how the country was still in a de facto serfdom post-emancipation is especially interesting and I hope you'll discuss that further. One brief note: don't feel that you have to choose sides with whether Holberg was a "power to the people" guy or not. What's interesting is the complex position he was in - his plays seem to argue for the commoner, yet he had to take a position with the king in order to produce them. Teasing out the complexities of this position helps expose some of interesting context of this time.

Question 3 - You're doing well in choosing areas to omit from your presentation. I like this idea of finding where you can simply mention something by name, rather than going into an entire monologue about them. Again, this gets at that idea of framing that I mentioned above. Consider the key information you want to get out, what is the necssary info you need to have in order to express that information, and then what is optional (but fun!) information to include if you have extra time.

Great job! Looking forward to learning more about this.


Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by schm3249 published on November 18, 2012 3:58 PM.

Annotated Bibliography was the previous entry in this blog.

SCULPT! (Our Argument) is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.