of primary conflict
it is November and yet the evening's fog speaks of a chilly dawn in spring. it is that kind of fog that all at once remains cool while bathing one in the warmth of a well-worn wool blanket. it is all that i can do not to simply run from this repressing room out the door and loose myself in a smoky embrace of this evening’s transformation. it is this endeavor of mine, this scholastic architecture business, that is simultaneously urging exploration and confining me indoors and viciously constraining my day. it is after all indoors where it is suitable to write of observations when that which moves me is waiting hopelessly for me - as i have yet to diagram the spatial complexity of a stairwell, yet to read endlessly of other, more important opinions of what and what is not moving of the natural environment, yet to write paper after paper about ancient structures and their conventionally agreed upon greatness. i am expected to create narrations of how a particular Roman dome evokes a feeling of godly creation when i have never once experienced even setting my foot in the entire continent of Europe – all while this godly greatness can be seen out my window. i have to wrestle with the administration, a great work of erratic politics, of minute paperwork details that in reality won’t concern this billion-dollar enterprise of a university when the issue at hand is my future career and monumental debt. a future career that regardless of eight years of scholastic training i will arrive to inevitably feeling completely ill prepared for. no, i will jump through the hoops set before me, pay dearly for them and learn about great architecture by reading of it.
“Every form has its own meaning. Every man creates his meaning and form and goal. Why is it so important – what others have done? Why does it become sacred by the mere fact of not being your own? Why is anyone and everyone right – so long as it’s not yourself? Why does the number of those others take the place of truth?�
- Ayn Rand, The Fountainhead


