« Possible Cause For Water Problems in U Health Sciences Buildings? | Main | Francis Fukuyama: "Let's get rid of tenure." »

Openness and Transparency at the University? In Your Dreams....

[Note added (4/19/09) the Strib has picked up on the Daily story.]

Mr. Mason and the money he is going to make?

Mason [University chief investment officer] said he would like to see the University begin to make more money.

“Thirty [million dollars] to $50 million means a lot of scholarships and life-saving research that won’t get done if they don’t pass this bill,” Mason said.

To which I say - horse hockey.

Read the article below. This character has the gall to suggest that transparency is costing the University lots of millions of dollars because they can't invest in the next Google and get annual returns on investments of thirty percent. It is exactly this greedy, arrogant, and NON-TRANSPARENT activity that has gotten us in the mess we are currently in. It is a sad day, indeed, when a University official would make the statement to be found above and below.

Given the University's appalling record on openness and transparency in the last few years, the Daily reports some very disturbing activities on this front.

From the Daily:

Legislators are currently discussing a bill that would restrict public access to some financial decisions regarding the University of Minnesota’s endowment.

Specifically, the bill — on both the House and Senate floors — would prevent the public from accessing information about private venture capital investments that could cause competitive harm to the University or its investments.

Stuart Mason, University chief investment officer, said this bill, if passed, would make it easier for the University to find smart investments and could help increase the endowment — which is about $910 million.

Certain venture capital groups have discontinued or avoided relationships with the University because of the current Data Practices Act, which allows public access to its investments, Mason said.

He said the current access to information could prevent the University’s endowment from profiting off of the next Google, for example.

Most venture capitalist groups have told Mason that the University cannot invest with them if “competitive information” can be accessed through a DPA or Freedom of Information Act request.
“There has been a trend where we have been consistently excluded from investment partners,” he said.

Mason said the access of information allows other groups to see who the University is investing with and creates a competitive disadvantage because they cannot hide their good investments from competitors.

If this bill passes, the endowment could see increases between $30 and $40 million per year because some of the venture capital groups denying the University produce up to a 30 percent return on investments each year, Mason said.

Sen. Don Betzold, DFL-Fridley , said University officials came to him with this proposal about a year ago. Betzold, one of the co-authors of the Senate bill, said he supports the bill because it could help raise money for the University.

“If you’re saying the University has an opportunity to increase some of its funds and make great returns that are going to help the financial stability of its investments, I think most people would say that’s a good idea,” Betzold said.

But not everyone agrees that the University profiting by hiding public information is a good idea.
Rep. Steve Drazkowski, R-Wabasha , said he thinks Minnesotans should be able to see where their money is going.

“If we’re shutting off people’s access to information about where their money goes, then the government is failing to be responsible to the people,” Drazkowski said.

The government should be transparent, Drazkowski said, and the passage of this bill would cause a sense of mistrust between the public and the government.

He also said the bill could send the message that the government is trying to make money.

“Government wasn’t created to make money,” Drazkowski said. “Government was created to serve the interest of the people, and we need to remember that and make that clear.”

Mason said one reason he thinks this bill could pass is because a similar bill passed in 2004 restricting public access to the Minnesota State Board of Investments.

Drazkowski said this precedent should not be a deciding factor for this bill and thinks the 2004 bill should be reconsidered.

While both current bills are a part of omnibus bills and could pass through the Senate and House, they still have to be signed by Gov. Tim Pawlenty.

Mason said he would like to see the University begin to make more money.

“Thirty [million dollars] to $50 million means a lot of scholarships and life-saving research that won’t get done if they don’t pass this bill,” Mason said.


President Robert Bruininks, State of the University Address (2009)

Bob, how does this plea for secrecy NOT contradict what you've said?

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)