« MED2010 - The Pause That Refreshes? | Main | Nevada's Chancellor is Paid $23,660 and He Donates It to Scholarships »

Something New or Same Old, Same Old - You Decide

The Strib has a piece by President Bruininks that just appeared on the web. This ran on Sunday along with the first part of the Generation Debt series. Part one of the series has also just appeared on the web.

President Bruininks opinion:

U tries to ease tuition burden with scholarships, creativity


The cost of college is the single most discussed issue in higher education today. Unfortunately, most of these discussions focus solely on "sticker price," fueling misconceptions about how much students pay and why.

First, it's important to understand that public universities have two main sources of money to keep the doors open and provide a quality education: state funding and tuition.

The University of Minnesota functions best when our state invests in us. But as state spending priorities shift, tuition is an essential source of predictable revenue.

Second, tuition does not equal out-of-pocket cost. Recognizing the essential role of tuition in our budget, the university supports creative strategies to reduce the burden on most Minnesota students and their families. We've done this by:

• providing free tuition to all low-income Minnesota students

• generating $256 million in private support in the past five years to endow scholarships, doubling the number we offer and the size of the awards

• reducing spending and increasing productivity to minimize increases in room and board costs

• and creating incentives -- including offering credits taken above 13 per semester for free -- to encourage timely degree completion

This last point is critical: completing a degree in four years instead of five saves approximately $20,000, and students who take longer than four years borrow more frequently and in higher amounts.

Since tuition is increasingly important to our ability to provide a world-class education, we must continue to moderate tuition increases for students with need.

The time is now to build on the progress we've made in support of low-income students, along with expanded grant support and higher education tax benefits from the federal government, to meet the needs of our state's middle-income families. Together we can work together to ensure affordable access for all Minnesota students.

President Bruininks,

Let's speak plainly.

We have the highest debt load and the lowest graduation rate in the BigTen.

Simply claiming that people should graduate faster is not the answer to the problem.

And I remind you that even if scholarships (I wish this were financial aid) are increasing, if the cost of attending the U (total) keeps going up at an even faster rate, then students are going to be deeper and deeper in debt. It is a matter of priorities and our current ones are out of alignment.

Talking about "ambitious aspirations to be one of the top three public research universities in the world [sic]" is inappropriate under the present circumstances.

So is the ca 750 million dollar building spree.

I hope that you have read all three parts of the Strib's Generation Debt series by now, and that you have learned some useful things from it. Repeating the same old stuff again and again about scholarship money increasing is not going to solve the debt and graduation problems, no matter how good your intentions might be.

What are you going to do to increase graduation rates, not incrementally, but significantly? And what steps are going to be taken so that we do not hold down the unenviable last place in the Big Ten as far as average debt at graduation goes?


Bill Gleason

Deeper in debt...

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)