« Transparency and Medtronic's $800,000 Doctor | Main | Priced Out of the American Dream? »

Hilarious Meeting At The U - Newt And TeePaw Talk Healthcare

From the Daily:

Gov. Tim Pawlenty and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich talked about the future of healthcare Wednesday at the University of Minnesota's McNamara Alumni Center.

They spoke to an audience of about 150 at a workshop titled "Creating a 21st Century Intelligent Health System in Minnesota," hosted by the Center for Health Information.

Pawlenty called the nation's healthcare system "fundamentally broken," and said reform should come through consumers paying for quality of care, and correcting medical malpractice.

[What a crock. Medical malpractice is a tiny part of the cost of healthcare. And the problem is easily rectified - see Texas.]

Both speakers critiqued the 1,000 page proposal released by the Obama Administration Tuesday, which would reduce the number of uninsured by 37 million and cost about $1 trillion dollars over 10 years.

Pawlenty said if national reform is centered on price, Minnesota would get the short end of the stick because it has one of the most efficient systems in the nation.

[No, Tim, that isn't how it is going to work if done right. Incentivizing efficient care should be to our advantage.]

Gingrich said the number one word to describe the proposal is "disappointing." He called it a "1970 socialized medical model brought up 30 years later." He said the proposal was all about control, and the bill created 31 new agencies, but lacked innovation.

[Ah Newt, you're so sixties, not even seventies. Will these people never get over the idea that all they have to say is "socialism" and everyone will drop an idea like a hot potato. Not anymore, pal.]

Both speakers said Obama's reform bill should be stalled. Gingrich said as time goes on it would be tougher to pass it through the Legislature.

Gingrich also shared Pawlenty's motto that it is unnecessary to raise taxes. He said if healthcare payments were aligned with value and "we go after the crooks" (people committing medical malpractice), there would be almost enough money to pay for universal coverage.

He gave the example of five pizza parlors that were claiming to treat HIV/AIDS to collect coverage as an example of people abusing the system.

[Yeah, that happens all the time. That damned Campus Pizza. Why pretty soon McDonalds will get into the racket.]

Frank Cerra, senior vice president for health sciences and dean of the Medical School, also said there is no need for new money to enter the healthcare system.
He said the way doctors are paid needs to change and nurses could be better utilized. Eliminating fraud in service programs like Medicare and Medicaid could also save money, Cerra said.

[Oh, Frank, puh-leeze. Stop the pandering and remember what you said at the Board of Regents meeting on July 8: "I would add parenthetically, where the president was, I think they should give us a little more money to do it with."]

Human service programs were also criticized at the state level, as Pawlenty said programs like General Assistance Medical Care were "designed on the heels of others," and are "now imploding."
[Pawlenty's position on GAMC has been outrageous. To quote only one outraged group, the socially conscious Catholic clergy: Archbishop John Nienstedt and the state's other bishops sent a letter to legislators last month encouraging them to balance the budget with a mix of revenue increases and cuts. "We believe that resolving the budget deficit through spending cuts alone will do great harm to Minnesotans and our economy," they wrote. "We urge you to support raising sufficient revenue as part of a comprehensive approach to resolving."

The bishops said that cuts to health and human services should spare the poor. "Catholic social teaching upholds the role of government to assist individuals and communities when they cannot help themselves. In performing this role, the state is fulfilling its moral responsibility to promote the common good."]

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)