Women and Children Last: The Discursive Construction of Weblogs
Susan C. Herring, Inna Kouper, Lois Ann Scheidt, and Elijah L. Wright, Indiana
University at Bloomington
An Apparent Paradox
Weblogs (“blogs”), frequently modified webpages containing individual
entries displayed in reverse chronological sequence, are the latest mode of
computer-mediated communication (CMC) to attain widespread popularity. As with
other new CMC technologies, blogs have been hailed as democratizing—any
literate person can self-publish content in a blog, and reach an audience of
potentially millions, for little or no cost. Moreover, the success of individual
blogs in attracting readers and influencing opinion depends less on their formal credentials than on the quality of their ideas and their writing (what Winer, 2003, calls their "voice"). Certainly blog authors are numerous: In the five years since
the introduction of the first free web-based blogging tools (Pitas and Blogger;
Blood, 2002b), the number of people creating and maintaining blogs has grown
exponentially, from fewer than 100 to over four million (Henning, 2003). Anecdotal accounts also suggest that they are diverse: the mainstream media have reported on popular blogs authored by individuals as varied as university adjuncts, dark horse candidates for political office, and a gay Iraqi dissident (McCarthy, 2003). As yet, however, there has been little empirical
examination of the claim that blogs are “democratic,” or that blog
authors represent diverse demographic groups.
Fifteen years ago, a similar claim was advanced with respect to Internet discussion
forums and chat rooms. Text-based CMC was purported to be inherently democratizing,
enabling anyone with access to participate, liberated from traditional biases
associated with gender, age, race, social class, (dis)ability, and physical
attractiveness (Graddol & Swann, 1989). Subsequent research revealed, however,
that the demographics of actual forum participants were strongly skewed towards
adult, white, English-speaking, technically-savvy males (Herring, 1992, 1993;
Kramarae & Taylor, 1993). As recently as 1992, Lee Sproull (quoted in Kramarae
& Taylor, 1993) estimated that only 5% of participants in Usenet newsgroups
were female. It was not until the rise in popularity of Internet service providers
and the introduction of the World Wide Web in the mid-1990s that Internet access
became available to a broader demographic spectrum, and that women started going
online in numbers similar to men (Herring, 2003a). The history of online discussion
forums thus shows that a “democratizing” technology does not automatically
result in social equality, and points to the importance of social and cultural
factors surrounding technology adoption and use.
What, then, of weblogs? An initial consideration of the demographics of blog
authors reveals an apparent paradox. Quantitative studies report as many (or
more, depending on what one counts as a blog) female as male blog authors, and
as many (or more) young people as adults (Henning, 2003; Orlowski, 2003), suggesting
a diverse population of bloggers as regards gender and age representation. At
the same time, as will be shown, contemporary discourses about weblogs, such
as those propagated through the mainstream media, in scholarly communication,
and in weblogs themselves, tend to disproportionately feature adult, male bloggers.
This inconsistency led us to ask: what are the actual demographics of blog authors,
determined according to what criteria? If significant numbers of female and
teen bloggers exist, how can their relative absence from public discourses about
weblogs be explained?
In this essay, we draw on methods of content analysis to establish both sides
of the paradox, and advance an explanation for it. Specifically, we propose
that the apparent gender and age bias in contemporary discourses about weblogs
arises in part as a result of focus on a particular blog type, the so-called
“filter” blog, which is produced mostly by adult males. We argue
that by privileging filter blogs and thereby implicitly evaluating the activities
of adult males as more interesting, important and/or newsworthy than those of
other blog authors, public discourses about weblogs marginalize the activities of women and teen bloggers, thereby indirectly reproducing societal sexism and ageism, and misrepresenting the fundamental nature of the weblog phenomenon. We conclude by advocating a broader characterization of weblogs that takes into account
the activities of a majority of blog authors, and more research on weblogs produced
by women and teens.
The remainder of the essay is organized as follows. The next section presents
quantitative evidence concerning the gender and age breakdown of contemporary
blog authors. Based on this evidence, an interpretive argument is advanced and illustrated with observations from public discourses about blogs in multiple domains.
Weblogs produced by women and teens are then considered in their own terms,
followed by a discussion and conclusions that explore the implications
of the observations presented.
Gender and Age of Blog Authors
Guernsey (2002) claims, on the basis of informal observation, that 40-50% of
bloggers are women. At least one report (Orlowski, 2003) goes further, asserting
that a majority of bloggers are teenage girls. What percentage of blog authors
are females and teens? To address this question, we conducted a gender- and
age-focused content analysis of a random sample of 357 blogs collected from
the largest available blog tracking site, blo.gs. The site tracks blogs hourly
from four sources: antville.org, blogger.com,
pitas.com, and weblogs.com (the last of which itself draws from multiple sources).
We collected blogs twice, six months apart, as part of a larger ongoing longitudinal
analysis of the weblog genre. At the times of our data collection, in March
2003 and in September 2003, the blo.gs site was tracking a total of roughly
350,00 and 700,000 blogs, respectively. We used the site's “random”
selection feature to collect two samples from these totals: the first containing
203 blogs, and the second containing 154 blogs.
Our goal in selecting these 357 blogs was to represent clear exemplars of the
weblog genre. First, we did not sample from hosting sites such as LiveJournal
or DiaryLand, in as much as they self-identified at the time more as journals
or diaries than as weblogs.We also excluded blogs with no text in the first entry, blogs that had not been updated within two weeks, and blog software used for non-blog purposes, since relatively few such blogs were identified by the blo.gs random selection feature, and could be assumed to be less prototypical. This resulted in a sample comprised exclusively
of active, text-based weblogs.
Gender of blog authors was determined by names, graphical representations (if
present), and the content of the blog entries (e.g., reference to “my
husband” resulted in a “female” gender classification, assuming
other indicators were consistent). Age of blog authors was determined by information
explicitly provided by the authors (e.g., in profiles) or inferred from the
content of the blog entries (e.g., reference to attending high school resulted
in a “teen” age classification). The gender of the blog author was
evident in 94%, and the age of the author in 90%, of the blogs in the combined
The results of the analysis of gender and age indicators reveal that the numbers
of males and females, and of adults and teens, are roughly equal, especially
in the later sub-sample. This is summarized in Table 1 (for gender) and Table
2 (for age).
Table 1. Gender of Blog Authors
Age was coded into two categories for the earlier sample (adult and teen,
operationalized as less than 20 years of age). For the later sample, we added
an “emerging adult” category for authors between the ages of 20
and 25 (cf. Arnett, 2000), based on our impression after coding the first sample
that many “adult” blog authors were in their early 20's.
Table 2. Age of Blog Authors
Males and females are distributed unequally across the age categories, as
shown in Figure 1 (for the earlier sample) and Figure 2 (for the later sample).
That is, there are more female than male “teens,” and more male
than female “adults.” Participation by gender is equal only in the
“emerging adult” category in the later sample.
Figure 1. Gender and Age of Blog Authors in March Sample
Figure 2. Gender and Age of Blog Authors in September Sample
There is also a skewed distribution of the gender and age of blog authors in
relation to blog type. In a recent study, Herring, Scheidt, Bonus and
Wright (2004) found evidence of three basic types of weblogs: the content of
filters is external to the blogger (links to world events, online happenings,
etc.), while the content of personal journals is internal (the blogger's
thoughts and internal workings), and k(nowledge)-logs are repositories
of information and observations with a typically technological focus. In the
present study, we coded each blog in the sample as journal, filter, k-log, or
mixed (a combination of two or all of the first three types). The results for
the two sub-samples combined, broken down by age and gender of blog author,
are presented in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Blog Type by Gender and Age of Authors (single-authored
Figure 3 shows that gender and age vary in the sample according to blog type. The journal type is dominated by teen females (and is favored by females in general), whereas adult males predominate in the creation of filter-type (e.g., news and politics-oriented) blogs and k-logs, as well as in the “mixed” category, which necessarily includes either filter or k-log content. At the same time, Figure 3 reveals an overwhelmingly greater frequency of personal journal-type blogs than of any other blog type. At 71% of the total number of blogs in the sample, the personal journal is the most popular type in every demographic category.
The preponderance of personal journals, and the large number of blogs maintained
by teenage girls, in particular, are striking given that our sample did not
include popular online journal hosting sites such as LiveJournal. Including
such sites more than doubles the number of “blogs” available, and
increases the number of female and young bloggers. A study released in October
2003 by the Perseus Development Corporation of blogs created on the services
Blog-City, BlogSpot, Diaryland, LiveJournal, Pitas, TypePad, Weblogger and Xanga
estimated that of 4.12 million hosted blogs, 56% were created by females and
52.8% by people under the age of 20, with an additional 39.6% being created
by young adults between the ages of 20 and 29 (Henning, 2003). These data provide further evidence of a correlation between female gender, youth, and the personal journal blog type.
The Discursive Construction of Weblogs
There is thus a relationship between blog type and author demographics. We propose that this relationship sheds light on how weblogs have been discursively constructed—that is, how meanings and values have been assigned to the emergent weblog phenomenon through its invocation in public discourses—and why such constructions favor men. A selective focus on filter-style blogs,
and to a lesser extent, k-logs, characterizes mass media reports, scholarship
about weblogs, definitions and historical accounts of the weblog phenomenon
produced by blog authors (including by women), and patterns of linking and referring
within the blogosphere itself, as described below. Since men are more likely
to create filter blogs than are women or teens, this selective focus effectively
privileges adult male bloggers. In each case, this outcome is mediated by other motivations
that are arguably not sexist or ageist in and of themselves, but that reproduce
societal sexism and ageism around weblogs as a cultural artifact.
Mass Media Reports
Media reportage about weblogs, even when ostensibly concerned with the phenomenon
of blogging in general, tends to focus on adult male weblog authors. To quantify
this impression, we conducted an informal content analysis of 16 articles about
blogs from mainstream news sources that happened to come across our desks between
November 2002 and July 2003. These articles had been collected by or forwarded to the us by colleagues as being of general interest about the weblog phenomenon, before we decided to study gender and age of bloggers, and thus would not be expected to contain any particular gender or age bias. (A list of the articles is included in the Appendix.) The results reveal that:
- more males (88%) are mentioned in the articles than females (12%);
- males are mentioned multiple times in the same article more often than
- males are mentioned earlier in the articles than females;
- males are more likely to be mentioned by name than females; and
- all 94 males mentioned are adults, except for one adolescent male blogger.
The preference to mention adult males is consistent across the
articles, regardless of their topical focus. The one exception
is an article focused on female weblog authors (Guernsey, 2002), published in
the New York Times, which mentions 7 females and 6 males, although all of the bloggers named are adults. With the exception of the New York Times article, none of the articles
in the sample mentions the gender or age of
the blog authors—rather, adult male bloggers are presented as if they
are “typical.” While this sample is admittedly small, informal observation
suggests that articles such as these were common around the time we conducted
our random blog analysis.
Although they constitute a minority (13%) of blogs, as noted above, filters
and k-logs receive the majority of media attention in this sample. Two phenomena
that figure repeatedly in the 16 articles are political filters that comment
on U.S. aggression in Iraq (so-called “warblogs,” e.g., Ostrom,
2003; Webb, 2003; cf. Cavanaugh, 2002), and Dave Winer's efforts to establish
k-logs at Harvard University (e.g., Festa, 2003; Hastings, 2003). It may be
that journalists deem filters and k-logs more “newsworthy” in that
their content is information in the external world (events, technology developments,
etc.; i.e., “hard news”), rather than internal to the blogger (cf.
human interest stories and “soft news”; ben-Aaron, 2003). An unintended
effect of this practice, however, is to define blogging in terms of the behavior
of a minority elite (educated, adult males), while overlooking the reality of
the majority of blogs, and in the process, marginalizing the contributions of
women and young people—and many men—to the weblog phenomenon.
Scholarship on weblogs is still in its infancy, so there is little published
literature as yet. However, some scholarly activities associated with weblogs
already show evidence of an adult male bias. Conferences to discuss weblogs
have thus far tended to attract more male than female participants. A seminar
on blogs organized in the spring of 2003 by Dave Winer at the Harvard Berkman
Center was heavily male dominated, judging by photos of the event posted on
Dave Winer's blog. At the Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) conference
held in Toronto in October, 2003, twelve out of sixteen papers (75%) presented
in the four sessions dedicated to weblogs were authored by men, and males made
up roughly 70% of the audience who attended those sessions as well, at a conference
that was otherwise more than 50% female. Tellingly, two papers by female scholars
analyzing LiveJournal communication (Kendall, 2003; Raynes-Goldie, 2003) were
relegated to a separate session, the name of which did not include the word
The papers about blogs presented at the AoIR conference that are based on
empirical observation have tended to focus uncritically on what are, in effect,
filter-style blogs. Krishnamurthy (2002) studied discussion on the popular “community
blog,” Metafilter, of the terrorist events of September 11, 2001, as an
example of online democracy. Delwiche (2003) tracked news stories linked to
by blog authors in support of the claim that the blogging “community”
is interested in political issues. Park (2003) focused on the four most popular
blog authors, assessed by the number of incoming links their blogs receive from
other bloggers, whom he characterized as “public intellectuals”;
these included Glenn Reynolds of InstaPundit fame along with other authors of
political filter-type blogs. Similarly, the 25 “scholars who blog”
described by Glenn (2003)—many of them aspiring public intellectuals (and
all but two of them men)—produce filter blogs focused on political issues
outside and inside academe.
In choosing to focus on filter blogs, Internet scholars are not necessarily
intending to privilege adult male blog authors. Rather, such blogs are deemed
interesting for their “democratizing,” “socially transformative”
potential as alternative news sources (Delwiche, 2003; Krishnamurthy, 2002;
cf. Lasica, 2001), whereby individuals with something to say can attract and
potentially influence a mass audience. Sometimes, as in the case of the blogs
studied by Park (2003), their sheer popularity makes them interesting. In this
sense, scholars, like journalists, are mirroring what they observe within the
Blog authors themselves contribute unwittingly to creating a hierarchy within
the blogosphere with adult males at the top. They do this by linking to “A-list”
blogs, which tend overwhelmingly to be filter-type blogs created by men, thereby
contributing to these blogs’ perceived popularity and status. The “A-list”
blogs, in turn, link mostly to other men’s blogs: in a count of links
from the blogrolls of the top ten blogs (as determined by number of incoming
links), Ratliff (2003) found that only 16% led to sites of female bloggers.
As we have seen, men are more likely than women or teens to comment in their
own blogs on political issues. They are also more likely to post entries to
public-access group sites such as Metafilter (cf. Krishnamurthy, 2002). Thus
male blogs are more likely to be very popular (where popularity is defined in
terms of number of incoming links), and males are more likely to frequent popular
blogs. To the extent that those who write about blogs focus on those that are
most popular or otherwise have the highest public profile, the tendency for
men to be featured is partially explained.
Some blog authors also write about blogs, defining and narrating the history
of the weblog genre. Defining and historicizing are powerful discursive means
of constructing reality, and of de facto exclusion. The filter type
plays a central role in definitions and historical accounts of weblogs produced
by influential blog authors. Notable among these is Dave Winer, a software developer
often credited with creating the first weblog circa 1996: a newspage containing
links to information related to his software products. Winer (2002) himself
credits Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee with having the first functional weblog—a
regularly-updated list of links to new sites on the Web—thereby effectively
defining the weblog as link-centered (the definition of the modern filter) from
before the time the weblog as such was known. No females are mentioned in Winer's
(2002) account of the history of blogging. Rebecca Blood (2002a), a blogger
since 1999 and a published authority on weblogs, largely echoes Winer's history,
adding an observation about the rise of journal-style blogs, which she suggests
were already more numerous than filters by late 1999. However, Blood's account
focuses on filter blogs, as more representative of the genre as
a whole: “I would go so far as to say that if you are not linking to your
primary material when you refer to it—especially when in disagreement—no
matter what the format or update frequency of your website, you are not keeping
a weblog.” According to this definition, personal journal blogs, many
of which contain no links (Herring et al., 2004), are not “weblogs”!
Bloggers such as Winer and Blood (who is female) are presumably not intending
to exclude women and youth from the definition of blogging. Rather, they are
defining the weblog based on their own activities and those of the people they
know, and extrapolating back in time to the antecedents of those activities.
In so doing, however, they overlook an important phenomenon that predates Winer's
first filter, and in which women and teens play a central role: the online journal.
Online journals, known as such since 1995, are the precursor of the personal
journal blog (Herring, 2003b) as well as of journal hosting sites such as LiveJournal.
Like journal blogs, they contain self-revealing content, are updated frequently,
and tend to present messages in reverse chronological sequence. A number of
people who maintained online journals in the mid-1990s have since switched to
using blog software, further blurring the distinction between the two. From
the outset, online journals, like the tradition of hand-written diaries they
draw from, have been associated with women (McNeil, 2003). Flynn (2003) describes
the rise of online communities of women journaling about weight loss, illness,
pregnancy, child rearing, and other topics of special concern. Women (and men)
also journal about events in their everyday lives. This is illustrated for three
different journal formats in Figures 4-6.
Figure 4 is a screen shot of the home page of an early online journal created
by a female science fiction writer. The first entry introduces the journal,
then describes the author's recent activities (which include giving her boss
a hat for her baby for Christmas, selling a novella to a publisher, and visiting
her parents), followed by a poem “to an old lover.”
Figure 4. An early online journal
Figure 5 shows a journal-style blog from our random blog corpus created by
a young married woman. With the exception of the modern two-column format and
blog-specific features such as archives and a blogroll on the left, it is functionally
and stylistically similar to the early online journal example: the author relates,
in chronological order, events from her personal life, including getting her hair
cut short, shopping, and socializing with her husband and father-in-law.
Figure 5. A personal journal blog
Figure 6 is the home page of a LiveJournal created and maintained by a teenage
girl. It contains features characteristic of the LiveJournal format—a
mood indicator, an indicator of the music the author is currently listening
to, and a profile of the author with her username (“flickering star”)
and an image (in this case, of a night scene). As in the other examples, however,
the content is current events in the author's personal life—learning how to play bridge, socializing with friends, plans for future entertainment, and complaints about schoolwork.
Figure 6. A LiveJournal
These three examples, although illustrating different time periods and formats of online journals, are similar in their content; women and girls have led in the creation and use of all three formats. A historical account of weblogs that accorded a central place to personal journals—as their prevalence merits—would thus identify females as the creators, early adopters, and most characteristic current users of weblogs.
While it is beyond the scope of this essay to compare the content and style
of journal blogs created by females with those created by males, it is our impression
that many similarities exist. Male journalers, who comprise about 40% of journal
writers, also write about their personal lives, friends, family, and school
or work activities, often in self-revealing ways. In an interview with New York Times reporter Emily Nussbaum (2004), one 15-year-old boy described his online journal as "better than therapy," a way to get out the emotions he thought might get him in trouble if he expressed them in school or at home. This constitutes another reason why a comprehensive analysis of blogging should take online journaling into account. Excluding personal journals—defining
them as less important or “not weblogs”—not only minimizes
women’s and teens’ contributions to the evolution of blogging, but
overlooks broader human motivations underlying the weblog phenomenon.
Women and young people are key actors in the history and present use of weblogs,
yet that reality is masked by public discourses about blogging that privilege
the activities of a subset of adult male bloggers. In engaging in the practices
described in this essay, participants in such discourses do not appear to be
seeking consciously to marginalize females and youth. Rather, journalists are
following “newsworthy” events, scholars are orienting to the practices
of the communities under investigation, bloggers are linking to popular sites,
and blog historians are recounting what they know from first-hand experience.
At the same time, by privileging filter blogs, public discourses about blogs
implicitly evaluate the activities of adult males as more interesting, important
and/or newsworthy than those of other blog authors.
Many of these participants (including most of the journalists) are themselves
female. Nonetheless, it is hardly a coincidence that all of these practices
reinscribe a public valuing of behaviors associated with educated adult (white)
males, and render less visible behaviors associated with members of other demographic
groups. This outcome is consistent with cultural associations between men and
technology, on the one hand (Wajcman, 1991), and between what men do and what
is valued by society (the “Androcentric Rule”; Coates,
1993). As Wajcman (p.11) notes, “qualities associated with manliness are
almost everywhere more highly regarded than those thought of as womanly.”
In this case, discourse practices that construct weblogs as externally-focused,
substantive, intellectual, authoritative, and potent (in the sense of both “influential”
and “socially transformative”) map readily on to Western cultural
notions of white collar masculinity (Connell, 1995), in contrast to the personal,
trivial, emotional, and ultimately less important communicative activities associated
with women (cf. “gossip”). Such practices work to relegate the participation
of women and other groups to a lower status in the technologically-mediated
communication environment that is the blogosphere, and more generally, to reinforce
the societal status quo.
It remains to explain why weblogs, but not other forms of CMC, have been discursively
constructed so as to exclude women and young people from the realm of active
participants. In the early days of the Internet, participation by diverse groups
was exaggerated, if anything, to show the “democratic” nature of
the medium (cf. Herring, 1993). With weblogs, the opposite is the case; actual
diversity (and hence evidence of the democratic nature of weblogs) is discursively
minimized. Two reasons for this suggest themselves. The first is that the larger context has changed; gender dynamics online now broadly reproduce the offline status quo (Herring, 2003a), making gender equity less of an issue in discourse about the Internet. This may explain why participation in blogging by females and members of other demographic groups merits relatively little comment. The second is that unlike in more interactive forms of CMC, the individual author is central in weblogs, as in traditional forms of print authorship. In keeping with the Androcentric
Rule, male authors historically have been more highly valued than female authors
(Spender, 1989). Moreover, personal journal-writing, traditionally associated
with women, is generally not considered “serious” writing (Culley,
1985; McNeill, 2003). This may explain why weblogs are being discursively constructed
so as to exclude women and young people (also assumed to be incapable of “serious”
writing), and why journal-style blogs receive little attention despite being
the most popular form of blogging for all demographic groups.
We began this essay with an apparent paradox: Why, given that there are many
female and teen bloggers, do public discourses about weblogs focus predominantly
on adult males? The observation that men are more likely than women and teens
to create filter blogs provides a key: It is filter blogs that are privileged,
consistent with the notion that the activities of educated, adult males are
viewed by society as more interesting and important than those of other demographic
groups. However, the blogs featured in contemporary public discourses about
blogging are the exception, rather than the rule: all the available evidence
suggests that blogs are more commonly a vehicle of personal expression than
a means of filtering content on the Web, for all demographic groups including
adult males. It follows that more attention needs to be paid to “typical”
blogs and the people who create them in order to understand the real motivations,
gratifications, and societal effects of this growing practice. This would require
advancing a broader conception of weblogs that takes into account the activities
of diverse blog authors, considering personal journaling as a human, rather
than exclusively a gendered or age-related activity, and conducting research
on weblogs produced by women and teens, both for their inherent interest and
to determine what differences, if any, exist among groups of bloggers.
Are weblogs inherently “democratizing,” in the sense of giving
voice to diverse populations of users? The empirical findings reported for gender
and age at the beginning of this essay suggest that they are. Yet public commentators
on weblogs, including many bloggers themselves, collude in reproducing gender
and age-based hierarchy in the blogosphere, demonstrating once again that even
an open access technology—and high hopes for its use—cannot guarantee
socially equitable outcomes in a society that continues to embrace hierarchical
Blogger is the most popular
blog creation software in use at the present time (Herring, Scheidt, Bonus,
& Wright, 2004).
Only English blogs were included
in the sample, since it was necessary that we be able to read them in order
to determine the gender and age of blog authors.
For a more detailed description
of the content analysis methodology employed in this project, see Herring, Scheidt,
Bonus & Wright (2004).
The numbers given in these
tables and in subsequent figures are only for those blogs for which the gender
and age of the author could reliably be determined.
This number includes emerging
adults from the first sample.
of blogs coded as each type:
journal - http://copiaguebritt.blogspot.com/
k-log - http://www.mikemcbrideonline.com/officebeta/default.html
mixed - http://torillsin.blogspot.com/
For an example of a journalistic
article that presents a more balanced perspective (by including both female
and male, and teen and adult, bloggers), see Armstrong (2003). This article
came to our attention after we began our research on gender and age representation
of blog authors, as did also Orlowski's (2003) piece, based on research on Polish
blogs, proclaiming that “most bloggers are teenage girls.”
The traditional model of “hard” news stories is event-centered, time-dependent
and competitive. […] Most work in media studies has focused either on hard news
[…] or on news adjuncts such as entertainment-oriented talk shows, children’s
programming, women’s pages or advertising, which are uncritically categorized
as ‘soft’ before the experiment is begun […] (pp. 83, 76; emphasis added)
majority (91%) of blogs in our sample are single-authored.
Appendix: Mass Media Reports included in Article Sample
 The New York Times, November 28, 2000. Telling all online:
It's a man's world (isn't it?), by Lisa Guernsey.
 The Washington Post, December 19, 2002. Free
speech -- virtually, by Jennifer Balderama.
 The Washington Post, December 20, 2002. Blogging
goes mainstream, by Cynthia L. Webb.
 Chicago Tribune, January 7, 2003. The famed InstaPundit
is blogger from Tennessee, by Ellen Warren.
 digitalMASS.com, January 15, 2003. China blocks Internet
'blog' sites, by Juliana Liu.
 c/net News.com, February 25, 2003. Blogging comes to Harvard,
by Paul Festa.
 Newsweek, February 27, 2003. Blogman becomes Harvardman, by
 SiliconValley.com, February 28, 2003. Net plays big role in
war news, commentary, by Mary Anne Ostrom.
 digitalMASS.com, March 3, 2003. Blog publishers stealing
Web limelight, by Eric Auchard.
 abcNEWS.com, March 11, 2003. Beyond mainstream, by Anick Jesdanun.
 Harvard University Gazette, April 17, 2003.
Berkman Center fellow Dave Winer wants to get Harvard blogging: Weblog pioneer
preaches the gospel of blog, by Beth Potier.
 The Washington Post, April 8, 2003. Ethics of war
blogging, by Cynthia L. Webb.
 The Washington Post, April 10, 2003. The great blogging
ethics debate, by Cynthia L. Webb.
 Chicago Tribune, April 16, 2003. Sites are blogged down
in controversy, by Maureen Ryan.
 American Journalism Review, April 29, 2003. Online advances, by
 USA Today, July 8, 2003. Welcome to the Blogosphere, by
Armstrong, E. (2003). Do you
blog? The Christian Science Monitor, May 13.
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging
adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties.
American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.
ben-Aaron, D. (2003). When news
isn't news: The case of national holidays. Journal of Historical Pragmatics,
4 (1), 75-102.
Blood, R. (2002a). Weblogs:
A history and perspective. In J. Rodzvilla (Ed.), We've got blog: How weblogs
are changing our culture (pp. 7-16). Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.
Blood, R. (2002b). The Weblog handbook:
Practical advice on creating and maintaining your blog. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.
Cavanaugh, T. (2002). Let slip the blogs
of war. In J. Rodzvilla (Ed.), We've got blog: How weblogs are changing our culture
(pp. 188-197). Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
Coates, J. (1993). Women, men and language,
2nd edition. London:
Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities.
Berkeley: University of California
Culley, M. (1985). A day at a time: The
diary literature of American women from 1764 to present. New York: The Feminist Press of the City University of New
Delwiche, A. (2003). Reconstructing the
agenda in the world of do-it-yourself journalism. Paper
presented at Internet Research 4.0, Toronto, Canada. October.
Flynn, S. I. (2003). Scribe tribes and shape shifters: An ethnographic
study of online journal communities. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.
Glenn, D. (2003). Scholars who
blog. The Chronicle of Higher Education, June 6. A14-16.
Graddol, D. & Swann, J. (1989). Gender
voices. London: Blackwell Publishers.
Guernsey, L. (2002). Telling all online:
It's a man's world (isn't it?). The New York Times, December 2. http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/28/technology/circuits/28blog.html
Henning, J. (2003). The blogging iceberg - of 4.12 million hosted weblogs, most
little seen, quickly abandoned. Perseus Development Corp. White Papers. http://www.perseus.com/blogsurvey/thebloggingiceberg.html
Herring, S. C. (1992). Gender and participation
in computer-mediated linguistic discourse. Washington, D.C.: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics.
Document no. ED345552.
Herring, S. C. (1993). Gender and democracy
in computer-mediated communication. Electronic Journal of Communication,
3 (2). http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/v3n293.htm.
Reprinted (1996) in R. Kling (ed.), Computerization and Controversy,
2nd edition. New York: Academic Press (pp. 476-489).
Herring, S. C. (2003a). Gender and power
in online communication. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The Handbook
of language and gender (pp. 202-228).
Herring, S. C. (2003b). The past, present
and future of weblogs. School of Library and Information Science Colloquium,
October 31. http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/slis.blog.ppt
Herring, S. C., Scheidt, L.
A., Bonus, S. & Wright, E. (2004). Bridging the gap: A genre analysis
of weblogs. Proceedings
of the Thirty-seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-37). Los Alamitos: IEEE Press.
Kendall, L. (2003). Diary of a networked
individual: Interpersonal connections on LiveJournal. Paper
presented at Internet Research 4.0, Toronto, Canada. October.
Kramarae, C. & Taylor, H. J. (1993).
Women and men on electronic networks: A conversation or a monologue? In H.
J. Taylor, C. Kramarae, & M. Ebben (Eds.), Women, information technology,
and scholarship (pp. 52-61). Urbana, IL: Center for Advanced Study.
Krishnamurthy, S. (2002). The
multidimensionality of blog conversations: The virtual enactment of September
11. Paper presented at Internet Research 3.0, Maastricht, The Netherlands. October.
Lasica, J. D. (2001). Blogging as a form of journalism. USC Annenberg
Online Journalism Review, May 24. http://www.ojr.org/ojr/workplace/1017958873.php
McNeill, L. (2003). Teaching an old genre
new tricks: The diary on the Internet. Biography: And Interdisciplinary
Quarterly, 26, 24-48.
Orlowski, A. (2003). Most bloggers “are
teenage girls” - survey. The Register, May 30. http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/30954.html
Park, D. (2003). Bloggers and warbloggers
as public intellectuals: Charting the authoritative space of the weblog. Paper presented at Internet Research 4.0, Toronto, Canada. October.
Ratliff, C. (2003). Whose voices get heard? Gender politics in the blogosphere. Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, San Antonio, TX, March 2004. http://culturecat.net/node/view/303
Raynes-Goldie, K. (2003). Pulling sense
out of today's informational chaos: LiveJournal as a site of knowledge creation
and sharing. Paper presented at Internet Research
4.0, Toronto, Canada. October.
Spender, D. (1989). The writing or the
sex or why you don't have to read women's writing
to know it's no good. Athene Series.
Wajcman, J. (1991) Feminism confronts
Pennsylvania State University Press.
Winer, D. (2002). The history of weblogs.