Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Political spending is a form of protected speech under the First Amendment, and the government may not keep corporations or unions from spending money to support or denounce individual candidates in elections. While corporations or unions may not give money directly to campaigns, they may seek to persuade the voting public through other means, including ads, especially where these ads were not broadcast.

REFER: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission: SCOTUSblog

Former Supreme Court Justice Souter on Citizens United Decision and Freedom of Speech (8:24)

Justice Scalia on Citizens United (2:37)

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/205976

Leave a comment

Recent Entries

Federalism
State Powers   The Evolution of Federal-State Relations Dual Federalism The relationship between national and state governments in policy making…
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Political spending is a form of protected speech under the First Amendment, and the government may not keep corporations or…
Inequality and Interest Groups
Inequality READ: A Giant Statistical Round-Up of the Income Inequality Crisis in 16 Charts Larry Bartels on Income Inequality and…