Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Political spending is a form of protected speech under the First Amendment, and the government may not keep corporations or unions from spending money to support or denounce individual candidates in elections. While corporations or unions may not give money directly to campaigns, they may seek to persuade the voting public through other means, including ads, especially where these ads were not broadcast.

REFER: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission: SCOTUSblog

Former Supreme Court Justice Souter on Citizens United Decision and Freedom of Speech (8:24)

Justice Scalia on Citizens United (2:37)

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://blog.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/207790

Leave a comment

Recent Entries

Can interest groups improve political participation?
Cigler and Loomis, and to a lesser extent Strolovitch, made the claim that interest groups are a way of opening…
Political (under)representation of the disadvantaged
Cigler and Loomis (1991) outline the origins of (interest) group formation and the scope and impact these groups have on…
Is Political Equality Possible?
The readings this week cover topics related to group representation, interest groups, and political equality. Bartels findings reflect economic inequality…