Barr-Anderson publishes ground-breaking study
Daheia Barr-Anderson, Ph.D., assistant professor in Kinesiology, is the lead author on a newly published paper that appears today in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity and may be the first to investigate the relationship between TV and diet over the transition from adolescence to young adulthood.
The article, "Does Television Viewing Predict Dietary Intake Five Years Later in High School Students and Young Adults?" comes out of a study, part of the U of M’s School of Public Health’s Project EAT (Eating Among Teens) that followed almost 2,000 Twin Cities-area high- and middle-school children over a five-year period and showed that there was a significant downward trend in the quality of diets of “heavy viewers" -- those individuals who reported watching five or more hours of TV a day (versus “limited viewers" watched two hours or less a day, and “moderate viewers" between two and five). Researchers led by Barr-Anderson found that heavy-viewing high schoolers had a lower intake of fruits, vegetables, whole grains and calcium-rich foods, and higher intakes of snack foods, fried foods, fast food, sugar-sweetened beverages and trans fats five years down the road.
An interview with Professor Barr-Anderson appears on www.WSJ.com. Professor Barr-Anderson gave three interviews yesterday (MN News Network, HealthDay, and WCCO Radio), will have a live radio interview this morning (WJON, a St Cloud radio station), and a live TV interview with KARE-11 during their 5:50am "Sunrise" session on Tuesday morning.
Besides Prof. Barr-Anderson, the other journal article authors are Nicole I. Larson (Epidemiology), and Melissa C. Neslon, Dianne Neumark-Sztainer, and Mary Story, all in the School of Public Health.













poverty (a book frequently referenced by educators in Minnesota), is based on deficit thinking about children and their capacity to learn and relies on a model of teacher professional development that will not bring about the changes we need in classroom teaching. Ruby Payne provides a response to their criticisms.