High Stakes Testing and Standardized Tests

Vote 0 Votes


The usage of standardized testing in the process of college admissions has always been a source for debate. Critics say that standardized tests reward the ability to quickly answer superficial questions that do not actually require any real thought; in other words, they do not measure the ability to think or create in any field. Since I have taken these tests myself, I can attest to the questions requiring hardly any real thinking. Also, according to the text, the correlation between admission test scores and grades in college are usually below 0.5. Others argue that the tests are hardly even objective. The only objective part of standardized tests is when machines do the scoring. What items to include on the test, the wording and content, how the test is administered, amongst other things are all decisions made by subjective human beings.

I do not think that standardized test scores should be such huge indicators of someone's intelligence. As Howard Gardner suggests, intelligence comes in many different forms. I believe that high stakes testing is not helpful, and that the no child left behind act is bologna. Ultimately, I believe there are better ways to evaluate people's overall intelligence.

1 Comment

| Leave a comment


This is the right video, it explains standardized testing, high stakes testing, and the no child left behind act.

I seriously have no idea what the other video is. Frankly it's really creepy.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by jinxx198 published on November 20, 2011 11:57 PM.

Body Image Illusions was the previous entry in this blog.

Traits- Nature vs. Nurture is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.