foolish things that people do that I like
1.) Spontaneously smiling to themselves on the sidewalk.
2.) Laughing real hard and not being able to stop.
3.) Revealing silly things about themselves that they didn't mean to.
4.) The guy at Panera formally requesting, on the microphone, that "Customer #2095 to approach the counter", just to see if I wanted a pickle with my sandwich. ("I didn't know if you wanted a pickle or not. I don't know you that well.")
5.) Attempting to articulate acronyms (e.g., the other day, someone decided to pronounce the building where I work -- the LRDC -- as the LurDuck.)
6.) Making conversation to strangers in elevators.
7.) I love how you can make a group of teenagers instantly filled with the depth of their emotion just by playing a dramatic pop song (for example, in my high school years, this may have been Celine Dion's "My Heart Will Go On")
8.) Guys keeping precious keepsakes -- for example, one of my co-workers was moving out of her house, and found that her husband had been keeping a homemade button with a photograph of an 11-year-old cheerleader -- apparently, his first girlfriend.
9.) People using overly-melodramatic language or making metaphors that seem far too poetic for the present context.
10.) Customers at the grocery store standing for five minutes in front of the vast array of Cambpell's Soups, as if they have to imagine the gustatory sensation of each one before they can make a decision.
Comments
What a NEAT posting!! It made me smile. Am inspired now to try making a list myself! (Incidentally, was #4 cute??)
Posted by: Jane | Noviembre 14, 2005 07:06 AM
I am ashamed to say this took longer than I thought it would! "I/ME" kept invading my thoughts. It was a really good exercise that brought me out of myself to observe, or think of, other people. (And, it is so much easier to think of things you *don't* like, you know.)
Anyway, here goes (in no particular order):
1.) Adults making goofy faces and noises to make a baby laugh.
2.) Not writing down that a homework assignment consisted of only odd-numbered problems, and doing them all.
3.) Laughing with you over stupid things you discover you both have done.
4.) Humming when they work.
5.) Walking with their head turned a strange way on a windy day---so their hair won't blow the "wrong" way.
6.) Stopping to pick up a penny and thinking it will bring good luck.
7.) Defining "old" as anyone older than your parents! (thank you)
8.) Waving as they drive by whether they know you or not.
9.) Leaving their newspaper on a seat in the airport waiting area. Nice to find one if you are "bumped."
10) Ordering pecan pie and a "diet" soda.
How did I do?
Posted by: Jane | Noviembre 16, 2005 08:42 PM
You did good. Don't worry, I found it hard too.
And yes I always appreciate newspaper leftovers as well.
Posted by: Karin | Noviembre 16, 2005 09:20 PM
Karin: What would an example of your # 9 be?
Jane: Fantastic list, though I share your sentiment that things one doesn't like often overshadow the things one does.
Posted by: John | Noviembre 18, 2005 02:30 PM
Hi John! Have been worried about you. I feared you had indeed "drowned in esquivalience"! (Maybe I should check my dictionary to see if I spelled that correctly.)
Karin, I too would love to see an example of your #9, since I know you can do it so darn well! And, I like it too! Makes me smile!
Posted by: Jane | Noviembre 19, 2005 05:20 PM
well you would think that if I thought to post #9 that I would have had a concrete example in mind, and I can't think of one right now. What I'm not talking about is some academic using a 15-letter word when a 5-letter word would express the idea equally well or probably better. It's those unexpected situations when people in other walks of life -- not people paid to sound smart-- spontaneously decide to employ a literary device to tell you something quite mundane. Any one else's anecdotes are welcome, if you think of any...
Posted by: Karin | Noviembre 19, 2005 09:42 PM
Re: "What I'm not talking about is some academic using a 15-letter word when a 5-letter word would express the idea equally well or probably better."
Ouch. Point taken. I suppose the former hurts because it's a condition I'm not only guilty of, myself, but it is so endemic to my daily surroundings that I'm completely oblivious to it.
In other words, if you think of an example, Karin, you may well make my day (if not my year). No pressure, though.
And thank you Jane, for your concern. So far, I'm treading water.
Posted by: John | Noviembre 19, 2005 10:02 PM
Oh, sorry, I really didn't intend to offend there. I do it too; the jargon is different in the behavioral sciences but it definitely exists. But search of my own semantic space for a canonical examplar of our idiosyncratic discourse is yielding a null result. :-)
In other words, I'm guilty too.
I was emphasizing elaborate language in unexpected places because that's exactly when I'm happily surprised to hear it. I have friends and colleagues who are wonderfully masterful at playing with language, and I probably take it for granted. The idea is that outside of certain spheres of this world, much of the population is less creative with their vocabulary, and not necessarily out of lack of intellectual inability; it's more of a cultural thing, I think.
Posted by: Karin | Noviembre 20, 2005 03:09 PM
OK. I had these ready this a.m., and the UMN server must have been down. Couldn't get to D-of-the-T, nor S-L.
Tell me which, if any, of these examples are anywhere near your #9:
**Grandma, after a hard day, had been "pulled through a knothole backwards."
**Billie Tanner, disgusted with her creation in artistic oils, declared it "an abortion---a complete abortion."
**Principal Bob McAllister warned teachers to be alert every Spring by reminding "not all the squirrels are in the trees."
And last, but not least, Lucinda from "As the World Turns" prepared to "hoist with his own petard" any one she could.
What do you think??
Posted by: Jane | Noviembre 20, 2005 04:45 PM
Yes those are all good. Though possibly rather cryptic for any reader aside from myself. But that's OK.
You mentioned many older individuals -- I think that is telling, that previous generations made much more of an art out of their conversation then we do. But I don't know -- maybe that was because more subjects were taboo, so with the content of conversation limited, the surface language had to be jazzed up a bit. What do you think?
Posted by: Karin | Noviembre 20, 2005 05:58 PM
How very observant--my examples do all involve older people! Perhaps many younger people gain the attention they seek by use of profanity??? I shall be more attentive, and get back to you. Hmmmm
Posted by: Jane | Noviembre 21, 2005 06:27 AM