Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Blue Dog Democrats Well Represented in Upper Midwest

Bookmark and Share

The Blue Dog Democrats, though a dying breed, have a fair-sized delegation from the Upper Midwest. The Blue Dog coalition (originally formed in 1995) is a group of 37 conservative and moderate democrats who are seen as serious players in the policy arena due to frequently being swing votes. While Blue Dogs represent just 18% of US House Democrats across the nation, 30% of the Upper Midwest's democratic representatives are members of this coalition.

Eight-term representative Collin Peterson (MN-7) is the senior member of the Upper Midwestern wing of this coalition, and is well known for crossing party lines on key votes. Peterson is joined by six-term congressman Leonard Boswell (IA-3) and two-term congresswoman Stephanie Herseth (SD-At large).

The Blue Dog Coalition's stated goals are to "continue to make a difference in Congress by forging middle-ground, bipartisan answers to the current challenges facing the Country. A top priority will be to refocus Congress on balancing the budget and ridding taxpayers of the burden the debt places on them. The group also expects to be involved in a variety of issues, where the stale extreme left vs. right approach requires a breath of fresh air."

The Blue-Dog mantra certainly seems to have appeal for voters in the districts of these three representatives.

As discussed earlier at Smart Politics (September 19), Boswell appears to be safely leading in his race against Jeff Lamberti.

Peterson is considered to have one of the safest Democratic seats in the country, representing counties along Minnesota's western rim of the state. Peterson first defeated seven-term GOP incumbent Arlan Stangeland by 7.1 points in 1990. He then narrowly won in 1992 (by 1.3 points) and 1994 (2.6 points) before thoroughly dominating his GOP counterparts from 1996-2004 by an average margin of victory of 36 points.

Stephanie Herseth enjoys a 63% favorability rating by South Dakotans and an early poll had her more than doubling the support of her GOP opponent Bruce Whalen (Argus Leader/KELO-TV, July 2006). Herseth's family has a long political history in the state—her grandfather was governor of South Dakota, her grandmother was Secretary of State, and her father served in the state legislature for twenty years and was the Democratic Party's nominee for governor in 1986. Herseth won South Dakota's at-large seat to the U.S. House of Representatives in a June 1st special election. The special election was called to fill the seat vacated by Representative William Janklow who resigned on January 20th after being convicted of manslaughter for killing a motorcyclist with his automobile. Herseth edged Republican nominee Larry Diedrich by just two points (approximately 3,000 votes) and then won her rematch against Diedrich that fall by 8 points.

Previous post: MN: Split Ticket Voting Revisited
Next post: Third Parties: Minnesota Leads the Pace in US House Races

2 Comments


  • The opportunities created by 11/7/06 rest in the hands of Nancy Pelosi.

    Will she plot a course in the center?

    If so, we are likely to experience the true phenomenon of a partisan realignment.

  • The opportunities created by 11/7/06 rest in the hands of Nancy Pelosi.

    Will she plot a course in the center?

    If so, we are likely to experience the true phenomenon of a partisan realignment.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Gender Equality in the US House: A State-by State Quarter-Century Report Card (1989-2014)

    A study of 5,325 congressional elections finds the number of female U.S. Representatives has more than tripled over the last 25 years, but the rate at which women are elected to the chamber still varies greatly between the states.

    Political Crumbs

    Final Four Has Presidential Approval

    By edging Michigan in the final seconds Sunday, the University of Kentucky guaranteed that one school in the Final Four this year would be located in a state that was not carried by President Barack Obama in 2012. (Connecticut, Florida, and Wisconsin had previously earned Final Four slots over the weekend). Across the 76 Final Fours since 1939, an average of 3.1 schools have been located in states won by the president's ticket during the previous election cycle. All four schools have come from states won by the president 29 times, with the most recent being the 2009 Final Four featuring Connecticut, Michigan State, North Carolina, and Villanova. On 30 occasions three Final Four schools have been located in states won by the president, with two schools 11 times and only one school six times (the most recent being 2012 with Kansas, Kentucky, Louisville, and Ohio State). There has never been a Men's NCAA Division I Final Four in which no schools were located in states carried by the president's ticket.


    Three for the Road

    A new Rasmussen Poll shows Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker in a dead heat with likely 2014 Democratic nominee Mary Burke. Walker is seeking to win his third consecutive election after prevailing in 2012's recall contest. Eight of his predecessors accomplished this feat: Republicans Lucius Fairchild (in 1869), Jeremiah Rusk (1886), Robert La Follette (1904), Emanuel Philipp (1918), John Blaine (1924), Walter Kohler (1954), Warren Knowles (1968), and Tommy Thompson (1994). Three others Badger State governors lost on their third campaign: Democrat George Peck (1894), Progressive Philip La Follette (1938), and Republican Julius Heil (1942). One died in office before having the opportunity to win a third contest (GOPer Walter Goodland in 1947) while another resigned beforehand (Democrat Patrick Lucey in 1977 to become Ambassador to Mexico). Overall Wisconsin gubernatorial incumbents have won 35 of 47 general election contests, or 74.5 percent of the time.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting