Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Blue Dog Democrats Well Represented in Upper Midwest

Bookmark and Share

The Blue Dog Democrats, though a dying breed, have a fair-sized delegation from the Upper Midwest. The Blue Dog coalition (originally formed in 1995) is a group of 37 conservative and moderate democrats who are seen as serious players in the policy arena due to frequently being swing votes. While Blue Dogs represent just 18% of US House Democrats across the nation, 30% of the Upper Midwest's democratic representatives are members of this coalition.

Eight-term representative Collin Peterson (MN-7) is the senior member of the Upper Midwestern wing of this coalition, and is well known for crossing party lines on key votes. Peterson is joined by six-term congressman Leonard Boswell (IA-3) and two-term congresswoman Stephanie Herseth (SD-At large).

The Blue Dog Coalition's stated goals are to "continue to make a difference in Congress by forging middle-ground, bipartisan answers to the current challenges facing the Country. A top priority will be to refocus Congress on balancing the budget and ridding taxpayers of the burden the debt places on them. The group also expects to be involved in a variety of issues, where the stale extreme left vs. right approach requires a breath of fresh air."

The Blue-Dog mantra certainly seems to have appeal for voters in the districts of these three representatives.

As discussed earlier at Smart Politics (September 19), Boswell appears to be safely leading in his race against Jeff Lamberti.

Peterson is considered to have one of the safest Democratic seats in the country, representing counties along Minnesota's western rim of the state. Peterson first defeated seven-term GOP incumbent Arlan Stangeland by 7.1 points in 1990. He then narrowly won in 1992 (by 1.3 points) and 1994 (2.6 points) before thoroughly dominating his GOP counterparts from 1996-2004 by an average margin of victory of 36 points.

Stephanie Herseth enjoys a 63% favorability rating by South Dakotans and an early poll had her more than doubling the support of her GOP opponent Bruce Whalen (Argus Leader/KELO-TV, July 2006). Herseth's family has a long political history in the state—her grandfather was governor of South Dakota, her grandmother was Secretary of State, and her father served in the state legislature for twenty years and was the Democratic Party's nominee for governor in 1986. Herseth won South Dakota's at-large seat to the U.S. House of Representatives in a June 1st special election. The special election was called to fill the seat vacated by Representative William Janklow who resigned on January 20th after being convicted of manslaughter for killing a motorcyclist with his automobile. Herseth edged Republican nominee Larry Diedrich by just two points (approximately 3,000 votes) and then won her rematch against Diedrich that fall by 8 points.

Previous post: MN: Split Ticket Voting Revisited
Next post: Third Parties: Minnesota Leads the Pace in US House Races

2 Comments


  • The opportunities created by 11/7/06 rest in the hands of Nancy Pelosi.

    Will she plot a course in the center?

    If so, we are likely to experience the true phenomenon of a partisan realignment.

  • The opportunities created by 11/7/06 rest in the hands of Nancy Pelosi.

    Will she plot a course in the center?

    If so, we are likely to experience the true phenomenon of a partisan realignment.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting