Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Jim Doyle's Biggest Threat: The Greens or Mark Green?

Bookmark and Share

Despite voting democratic in the past five presidential elections and 13 of the past 15 U.S. Senate elections, Wisconsin is far from a safe 'blue' state for democratic candidates for governor—especially incumbent Jim Doyle. Democrats have not fared well in gubernatorial elections in the Badger state in recent years, garnering more than 46% of the vote only once in the seven such elections since 1978.

Doyle himself only narrowly won the state's open seat in 2002, beating Republican Scott McCallum by 3.7 points thanks in large part to the strong showing by Libertarian candidate Ed (brother of former governor Tommy) Thompson—who won 10.5% of the vote. Having a second, legitimate right of center candidate on the ballot in that election splintered the conservative vote, allowing Doyle to eke out a plurality vote victory.

This time around, however, the shoe is on the other foot. There is only one third party candidate on the ballot, and this time it comes from Doyle's left: Wisconsin Green Party candidate Nelson Eisman. If the race between Doyle and GOP challenger Mark Green is close (and it is—Doyle has failed to garner a level of support of 50% in any of 12 polls conducted by six pollsters since November 2005), Doyle will need to win over a majority of independent voters as well as protect his left-wing base.

If Eisman's candidacy gains any traction Doyle may be forced to continuously carve out his stance on hot-button referenda issues like bringing back the death penalty to Wisconsin and defining marriage. If Doyle doesn't back these referenda he risks losing votes from the public on issues that enjoy majority-status support. If he does back the amendments, his more liberal supporters might flock in greater number to Eisman.

In a race projected to be as close as the Doyle-Green matchup, a pull to the left on Doyle's candidacy by the Eisman campaign could signal big trouble for the sitting governor.

Previous post: Battle for the Statehouse: Minnesota's State Senate Races
Next post: Immigration: The Invisible Issue in the MN US Senate Race?

1 Comment


  • Listening to the We The People Governor's debate between Gov. Doyle and Rep. Green, Doyle comes off more articulate and Green less effective. I think one reason for this is that Green comes from Bush's Washington and therefore his constant talk of cutting taxes, and "bureacracy" and "leadership" sounds fishy - our nation's capital is perceived as a place of dishonesty corruption and incompetence, and the Democrats will probably win a lot of seats in these mid-term election because of that perception by many on all sides - including many Republicans.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Strange Bedfellows: A Historical Review of Divided US Senate Delegations

    Over the last century, states have been twice as likely to be represented by a single political party in the U.S. Senate than have a split delegation; only Delaware, Iowa, and Illinois have been divided more than half the time.

    Political Crumbs

    Haugh to Reach New Heights

    The North Carolina U.S. Senate race between Democratic incumbent Kay Hagan and Republican Thom Tillis may go down to the wire next Tuesday, but along the way Libertarian nominee Sean Haugh is poised to set a state record for a non-major party candidate. Haugh, who previously won 1.5 percent of the vote in the Tar Heel State's 2002 race, has polled at or above five percent in 10 of the last 12 polls that included his name. The current high water mark for a third party or independent candidate in a North Carolina U.S. Senate election is just 3.3 percent, recorded by Libertarian Robert Emory back in 1992. Only one other candidate has eclipsed the three percent mark - Libertarian Christopher Cole with 3.1 percent in 2008.


    Gubernatorial Highs and Lows

    Two sitting governors currently hold the record for the highest gubernatorial vote ever received in their respective states by a non-incumbent: Republican Matt Mead of Wyoming (65.7 percent in 2010) and outgoing GOPer Dave Heineman of Nebraska (73.4 percent in 2006). Republican Gary Herbert of Utah had not previously won a gubernatorial contest when he notched a state record 64.1 percent for his first victory in 2010, but was an incumbent at the time after ascending to the position in 2009 after the early departure of Jon Huntsman. Meanwhile, two sitting governors hold the record in their states for the lowest mark ever recorded by a winning gubernatorial candidate (incumbent or otherwise): independent-turned-Democrat Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island (36.1 percent in 2010) and Democrat Terry McAuliffe of Virginia (47.8 percent in 2013).


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting