Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


MN: Split Ticket Voting Revisited

Bookmark and Share

The latest Minnesota polls show the DFL surging in the US Senate race and in a dead heat in the gubernatorial race. The prospects of split ticket voting in these races was discussed a few days ago here at Smart Politics (September 25); today we reexamine this issue, in light of historical data in the Gopher state for DFL, Republican, and third party candidates across elections and offices.

Since 1990 the DFL has collectively received more votes than GOP candidates in races for president, US Senator, US House, State Senate, and State House, but the degree of DFL dominance has varied greatly depending on the office in question. During these years, the DFL has a substantial lead over the GOP in the number of votes cast for State Senate (a 9.2 point advantage), US House (9.1 points), and president (8 points), with a much narrower lead in votes cast for US Senate (2.4 points) and State House (0.2 points).

The largest difference in major party vote distribution is in the race for governor, in which republicans have a 11.1 point advantage over DFL candidates in four elections since 1990.

Third parties have had an increased profile in Minnesota since the 1990s, especially in races for governor (16.8% of all votes cast), president (11.0%), and US Senate (5.6%).

The total vote distribution by political party in Minnesota since 1990 is as follows:

President: DFL 48.5%, GOP 40.5%, 3rd Party 11.0%
Governor: DFL 36.1%, GOP 47.2%, 3rd Party 16.8%
US Senate: DFL 48.4%, GOP 46.0%, 3rd Party 5.6%
US House: DFL 52.7%, GOP 43.6%, 3rd Party 3.7%
State Senate: DFL 53.6% GOP 44.4%, 3rd Party 1.9%
State House: DFL 49.4%, GOP 49.2%, 3rd Party 1.4%

What does this quick snapshot at Minnesota historical election data tell us? The GOP has shown great strength in gubernatorial races in the face of strong DFL support in races for other major political offices. This suggests the state going DFL in the vote for senate in 2006 while still sticking with Pawlenty in the Governor's race fits in with the state's recent voting patterns.

Previous post: Will Minnesotans Split Their Ticket in November?
Next post: Blue Dog Democrats Well Represented in Upper Midwest

1 Comment


  • I did not get what you wrote down and I need to know about what eisman thinks about abortion for my homework and I did not find what I was looking for.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting