Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Choosing Sides: The Decline of Independents

Bookmark and Share

With the 2006 elections being cited as most expensive in U.S. history, filled with some of the nastiest campaign ads ever, one might expect to find increased disgust among the electorate for the two major parties responsible for these campaigns, especially by those who only weakly identify themselves with the Democratic and Republican Parties.

However, instead of abandoning these political parties and self-identifying in greater numbers as independents, the public seems to be sticking with the donkeys and the elephants. In fact, a study of partisanship trends across the Upper Midwest over the past year and a half finds the number of people identifying themselves as independents to be falling drastically.

Smart Politics examined the Party ID data in Iowa, Minnesota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin from SurveyUSA polling in May 2005 and September 2006 and found the percentage of independents in all four Upper Midwestern states had dropped.

In Iowa, 38 percent identified themselves as independents in May 2005, falling to just 26 percent in September 2006. In South Dakota the drop was even greater: 29 percent to 16 percent. Wisconsin also saw a double-digit drop: from 35 percent to 25 percent. In Minnesota, the drop was four points: 32 percent to 28 percent.

In Iowa, Wisconsin, and Minnesota the Democrats seemed to be the beneficiary of this change—with Democratic Party ID increases of seven, four, and two points respectively. In South Dakota, there was a seven-point uptick in those identifying themselves as republicans.

It seems even if the public is disgusted by the harsh political tone of the day, they are not throwing up their hands: they are choosing sides. In light of this apparent the increase in Party ID with the two major parties, Smart Politics suspects turnout in the 2006 mid-terms will be much higher than normal.

Previous post: MN House: GOP at a Disadvantage
Next post: WI-3: GOP Challenger Launches Unforgettable Attack Ad

1 Comment


  • I think part of the reason for the drop in independents is that the races seem so close, you don't want to "waste" your vote on a 3rd party candidate.

    I for one would like to vote for Peter Hutchinson for MN Gov and Bruce Kennedy for Sec. of State. However, I think it's even more important that T-Paw and Kiffmeyer not be re-elected. If I could be assured that Hatch and Ritchie don't need my votes, I would vote for the Independent candidates.

    It's a conundrum for independent candidates throughout and is probably why 3rd parties don't last long in American politics. It is also the main reason I will be voting for IRV in Minneapolis.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Which States Have the Longest and Shortest Election Day Voting Hours?

    Residents in some North Dakota towns have less than half as many hours to cast their ballots as those in New York State.

    Political Crumbs

    No 100-Year Curse for Roberts

    Defeating his Tea Party primary challenger Milton Wolf with just 48.1 percent of the vote, Pat Roberts narrowly escaped becoming the first elected U.S. Senator from Kansas to lose a renomination bid in 100 years. The last - and so far only - elected U.S. Senator to lose a Kansas primary was one-term Republican Joseph Bristow in 1914. Bristow was defeated by former U.S. Senator Charles Curtis who went on to win three terms before becoming Herbert Hoover's running mate in 1928. Only one other U.S. Senator from the Sunflower State has lost a primary since the passage of the 17th Amendment: Sheila Frahm in 1996. Frahm was appointed to fill Bob Dole's seat earlier that year and finished 13.2 points behind Sam Brownback in the three-candidate primary field. Overall, incumbent senators from Kansas have won 29 times against two defeats in the direct vote era. (Curtis also lost a primary in 1912 to Walter Stubbs, one year before the nation moved to direct elections).


    The Second Time Around

    Former Republican Congressman Bob Beauprez became the seventh major party or second place gubernatorial candidate in Colorado to get a second chance at the office when he narrowly won his party's nomination last month. Two of the previous six candidates were successful. Democrat Alva Adams lost his first gubernatorial bid to Benjamin Eaton in 1884, but was victorious two years later against William Meyer. Democrat Charles Johnson placed third in 1894 behind Republican Albert McIntyre and Populist incumbent Governor David Waite but returned as the Fusion (Democrat/Populist) nominee in 1898 and defeated GOPer Henry Wolcott. Gubernatorial candidates who received a second chance but lost both general elections include Democrat Thomas Patterson (1888, 1914), Progressive Edward Costigan (1912, 1914), Republican Donald Brotzman (1954, 1956), and Republican David Strickland (1978, 1986).


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting