Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Upper Midwest US House Races Tighten in GOP Held Districts...But Is a Revolution Afoot?

Bookmark and Share

A recent spate of polls tracking US House races in the Upper Midwest reflect what is perceived by most political analysts to be a nation-wide trend: GOP-held districts that were secure in 2004 now seem to be competitive or near competitive.

The GOP leads the current Upper Midwest US House delegation by a 12-10 margin, breaking down thusly:

IA: GOP 4, DEM 1
MN: GOP 4, DFL 4
SD: GOP 0, DEM 1
WI: GOP 4, DEM 4

No publicly released poll to date has shown a single democrat-held seat to be in jeopardy of the 10 on the ballot in the Upper Midwest. However, polls have shown at least 4 of the 12 GOP districts to be in a dead heat:

IA-2: David Loebsack (D) 46% Jim Leach (15 term GOP incumbent) 44%
MN-1: Gil Gutknecht (6 term GOP incumbent) 47% Tim Walz (DFL) 43%
MN-6 (open): Patty Wetterling (DFL) 47% Michele Bachmann (R) 43%
WI-8 (open): Steve Kagen (D) 46% John Gard (R) 43%

(Note: The polls listed above were conducted by Constituent Dynamics. This firm does not have a long track record of polling US House races, but it is run by two well-known and credible pollsters (one a Republican and one a Democrat). The firm uses automated polling to conduct its surveys. )

Iowa's (open) 1st US District race was expected to be the Democrat's best shot at a pick-up, but an early October Reuters/Zogby poll showed Republican Mike Whalen opening up a 47-34 lead over Bruce Braley in a survey of likely voters.

As a result of all this polling, many analysts are now starting to mention 2006 in the same breath as 1994 (the year the Republicans picked up a startling net 54 seats from the democrats in the US House).

However, while there are some similaities to that election year (e.g. low approval ratings for a president of the same party as the party in control of the House), such talk is premature. First, this buzz is partially occurring in a self-generating environment (the Internet) whose landscape was infinitely smaller 12 years ago when Republicans shocked the country. In truth, Internet buzz often falls short of real-world action (e.g. the disappointing box office take of the much-hyped horror film Snakes On A Plane).

Secondly, analysts do not want to be caught with their pants down for a second time, so they are perhaps mentioning similarities to the Republican Revolution so as to not look so foolish in November IF the Democrats stage their own (successful) revolution.

Thirdly, due to redistricting, the odds of democratic pick-ups numbering 4 or 5 dozen are much lower than in 1994. Today Democrats are fighting for seats in foreign territories—red districts that voted for President George W. Bush in 2004. In 1994 several Republican pick-ups were in districts already won by Republican George H.W. Bush in his 1992 re-election campaign.

Beware the revolution? Perhaps. But also beware those exclaiming, "Beware the revolution."

Previous post: Split Ticket Voting Revisited
Next post: MN-02: Rowley Closes Gap

2 Comments


  • The MN-01 figures are off--it's Gutknecht 48%--Walz 47%, within the MOE.

  • > The MN-01 figures are off--it's Gutknecht 48%--Walz 47%, within the MOE.

    Actually, the numbers posted at Smart Politics are correct: Gutknecht 47%, Walz 43%. I've looked at the poll details for Constituent Dynamics, and the 48-47 numbers to which you refer include "leaners" after pressing respondents who originally reply "undecided" or "other." Those leaners are very unreliable, and we therefore normally only analyze the original vote preference or respondents. But, yes, bottom line, the race is quite close either way.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Which States Own the Best Track Record in Backing Eventual GOP Presidential Nominees?

    Nine states (each with primaries) have an unblemished record in voting for the eventual Republican nominee since 1976 - and not all host contests on the back end of the calendar.

    Political Crumbs

    Evolving?

    When Scott Walker "punted" back in February after being asked if he was comfortable with the idea of evolution he added, "That's a question a politician shouldn't be involved in one way or the other." However, it may very well be a question that is asked at one of the upcoming GOP debates this year. In South Carolina during the first GOP debate in 2012, FOX News' Juan Williams asked Tim Pawlenty, "Do you equate the teaching of creationism with the teaching of evolution as the basis for what should be taught for our nation's schools?" Pawlenty replied, "There should be room in the curriculum for study of intelligent design" but that it was up to the local school districts if it should be in a science class or comparative theory class. At the fourth Republican debate held in California, Jon Huntsman addressed the GOP becoming "anti-science" thusly: "Listen, when you make comments that fly in the face of what 98 out of 100 climate scientists have said, when you call into question the science of evolution, all I'm saying is that, in order for the Republican Party to win, we can't run from science. We can't run from mainstream conservative philosophy."


    73 Months and Counting

    January's preliminary Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show Minnesota's unemployment rate of 3.7 percent was once again lower than Wisconsin's 5.0 percent. That marks the 73rd consecutive month in which Minnesota has boasted a lower jobless rate than its neighbor to the east dating back to January 2009 including each of the last 67 months by at least one point. The Gopher State has now edged Wisconsin in the employment border battle for 204 of the last 216 months dating back to February 1997. Wisconsin only managed a lower unemployment rate than Minnesota for the 12 months of 2008 during this 18-year span.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting