Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Seeds for Democratic Gains In U.S. House Actually Planted in 2004

Bookmark and Share

Even though Democrats lost seats in the U.S. House in 2004, there are several indicators in that election that suggest their Party was making inroads to be more competitive with Republicans—inroads that paid off in a big way in 2006. Trends in several measures of party competitiveness were already working in the Democratic Party's favor in 2004.

First, Democrats reduced the number of House districts in which they did not field an opponent against the GOP—from 45 in 2002, to 38 in 2004, to just 10 in 2006.

Secondly, Democrats drastically reduced the number of "blow out" races in which they fielded a candidate but were on the losing end of a 50 to 99 point margin. The number of blow out races dropped from 17 in 2002, to 9 in 2004, to just 5 in 2006.

Thirdly, Democrats also reduced the number of "very uncompetitive" districts in which they lost to Republicans by 30 to 49 points: from 96 in 2002, to 87 in 2004, to just 53 in 2006.

As a consequence of fielding more candidates and reducing the number of grossly uncompetitive districts, Democrats were positioning themselves in greater number in weakly competitive and competitive races. For example, Democrats increased the number of weakly competitive races in which they lost by between 11 and 29 points: from 53 in 2002, to 81 in 2004, to 100 in 2006.

The rise in weakly competitive GOP-held districts was not a result of Democrats losing ground in competitive districts held by the GOP: competitive districts (decided by between 0 and 10 points) rose from 20 in 2002 to 35 in 2006.

By picking up several seats in 2006 Democrats will naturally have to protect several districts that they won by slim margins (28 races were decided by 10 points or less). However, the sheer number of districts that are potentially up for grabs in 2008 has skyrocketed from 2002. The Democrats have positioned themselves to make the GOP defend up to 135 districts in 2008—almost double the number of competitive and weakly competitive districts in 2002 (73).

While defending a 25-point GOP-held district may not at first blush seem like a worrisome task, the current political climate dictates otherwise. Just ask ousted Republicans like J.D. Hayworth of Arizona (AZ-05) who won by 24 points in 2002, 22 points in 2004, and then lost by 5 points in 2006—a 27 point turnaround. Or ask defeated Connecticut Congresswoman Nancy Johnson (CT-05), who lost by 12 points in 2006 after winning by 22 points in 2004—a 34-point swing.

Previous post: Reader Request: Should Mike Hatch Have Better Utilized Keith Ellison in His Campaign?
Next post: GOP Struggling to Find Opportunities for Pickups in U.S. House Races

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

No Free Passes: States With 2 Major Party Candidates in Every US House Race

Indiana has now placed candidates from both major parties on the ballot in a nation-best 189 consecutive U.S. House races, with New Hampshire, Minnesota, Idaho, and Montana also north of 100 in a row.

Political Crumbs

Gubernatorial Highs and Lows

Two sitting governors currently hold the record for the highest gubernatorial vote ever received in their respective states by a non-incumbent: Republican Matt Mead of Wyoming (65.7 percent in 2010) and outgoing GOPer Dave Heineman of Nebraska (73.4 percent in 2006). Republican Gary Herbert of Utah had not previously won a gubernatorial contest when he notched a state record 64.1 percent for his first victory in 2010, but was an incumbent at the time after ascending to the position in 2009 after the early departure of Jon Huntsman. Meanwhile, two sitting governors hold the record in their states for the lowest mark ever recorded by a winning gubernatorial candidate (incumbent or otherwise): independent-turned-Democrat Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island (36.1 percent in 2010) and Democrat Terry McAuliffe of Virginia (47.8 percent in 2013).


An Idaho Six Pack

Two-term Idaho Republican Governor Butch Otter only polled at 39 percent in a recent PPP survey of the state's 2014 race - just four points ahead of Democratic businessman A.J. Balukoff. Otter's low numbers reflect his own struggles as a candidate (witness his weak primary win against State Senator Russ Fulcher) combined with the opportunity for disgruntled Idahoans to cast their votes for one of four third party and independent candidates, who collectively received the support of 12 percent of likely voters: Libertarian John Bujak, the Constitution Party's Steve Pankey, and independents Jill Humble and Pro-Life (aka Marvin Richardson). The six candidate options in a gubernatorial race sets an all-time record in the Gem State across the 46 elections conducted since statehood. The previous high water mark of five candidates was reached in seven previous cycles: 1902, 1904, 1908, 1912, 1914, 1966, and 2010.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting