Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Large Electoral Gains by Minority Party Not Uncommon in MN House

Bookmark and Share

The DFL scored a major, although not an unexpected, victory last month by wrestling control of the State House from the GOP after four consecutive terms of Republican control. The size of the DFL's victory—a 19-seat pickup—did surprise many political observers.

However, large electoral gains are not uncommon in recent political history of the state's 134-member chamber. In fact, nearly half of the House elections over the past 45 years have involved double-digit pickups: since 1962, 11 of 23 elections have resulted in pickups of at least 12 seats by the GOP or DFL.

The DFL's 19-seat pickup in 2006 is actually only the fourth largest pickup since 1962:

* In 1978 the GOP picked up 37 seats from the previous election to tie the DFL at 67-67.

* In 1974 the DFL added 27 seats from the previous election to take a commanding 104-30 lead over the Republicans.

* In 1962 the Republican gained 22 seats from the previous election to take control of the House.

As was the case in 2006, in 8 of these 11 elections with significant turnover, it was the minority party that achieved the big victory—often riding the wave launched by the national political climate.

For example, in 1974, the DFL rode the anti-Nixon wave to a 27-seat pickup and control of the House control just a few months after the Republican president resigned. In 1994, state republican House candidates benefited from the national momentum generated by the GOP's Contract with America in US House races—picking up 16 seats from the previous election cycle to reduce the DFL's advantage to less than 10 seats. In 1986 the DFL picked up nearly 20 seats in an election held a few days after the Iran-Contra story broke.

In sum, the DFL's large victory is not without precedent, and, considering the anti-Republican surge that was sweeping the country, the GOP could have sustained even worse losses.

Previous post: Right of Center Third Party Candidates Disappearing in Minnesota
Next post: MN vs. WI: Which State Is Most Likely to Vote GOP for President in 2008?

1 Comment


  • Even NM is setting or following a trend here that bloomed during the last 2006 US election; People are opposed to what the GOP have been doing to this country. For 50+ years we have built bases around the world, involved ourselves in conflicts around the globe, given away fortunes to other countries; all while Americans go without. All of this has come home to roost and from what I realized the other day my 11 year old daughter was, on her own with a $15 digital camera able to add a video to youtube which I never knew, and still don't know how to do.

    The next generation are what I say as lazy, but so am I compared to my day but the next generation are not stupid. We create our own problems and yet forget to protect ourselves. Get with it America, bring all our troops home, close bases and stop giving away money. Protect America by voting Democratic.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting