Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Large Electoral Gains by Minority Party Not Uncommon in MN House

Bookmark and Share

The DFL scored a major, although not an unexpected, victory last month by wrestling control of the State House from the GOP after four consecutive terms of Republican control. The size of the DFL's victory—a 19-seat pickup—did surprise many political observers.

However, large electoral gains are not uncommon in recent political history of the state's 134-member chamber. In fact, nearly half of the House elections over the past 45 years have involved double-digit pickups: since 1962, 11 of 23 elections have resulted in pickups of at least 12 seats by the GOP or DFL.

The DFL's 19-seat pickup in 2006 is actually only the fourth largest pickup since 1962:

* In 1978 the GOP picked up 37 seats from the previous election to tie the DFL at 67-67.

* In 1974 the DFL added 27 seats from the previous election to take a commanding 104-30 lead over the Republicans.

* In 1962 the Republican gained 22 seats from the previous election to take control of the House.

As was the case in 2006, in 8 of these 11 elections with significant turnover, it was the minority party that achieved the big victory—often riding the wave launched by the national political climate.

For example, in 1974, the DFL rode the anti-Nixon wave to a 27-seat pickup and control of the House control just a few months after the Republican president resigned. In 1994, state republican House candidates benefited from the national momentum generated by the GOP's Contract with America in US House races—picking up 16 seats from the previous election cycle to reduce the DFL's advantage to less than 10 seats. In 1986 the DFL picked up nearly 20 seats in an election held a few days after the Iran-Contra story broke.

In sum, the DFL's large victory is not without precedent, and, considering the anti-Republican surge that was sweeping the country, the GOP could have sustained even worse losses.

Previous post: Right of Center Third Party Candidates Disappearing in Minnesota
Next post: MN vs. WI: Which State Is Most Likely to Vote GOP for President in 2008?

1 Comment


  • Even NM is setting or following a trend here that bloomed during the last 2006 US election; People are opposed to what the GOP have been doing to this country. For 50+ years we have built bases around the world, involved ourselves in conflicts around the globe, given away fortunes to other countries; all while Americans go without. All of this has come home to roost and from what I realized the other day my 11 year old daughter was, on her own with a $15 digital camera able to add a video to youtube which I never knew, and still don't know how to do.

    The next generation are what I say as lazy, but so am I compared to my day but the next generation are not stupid. We create our own problems and yet forget to protect ourselves. Get with it America, bring all our troops home, close bases and stop giving away money. Protect America by voting Democratic.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Strange Bedfellows: A Historical Review of Divided US Senate Delegations

    Over the last century, states have been twice as likely to be represented by a single political party in the U.S. Senate than have a split delegation; only Delaware, Iowa, and Illinois have been divided more than half the time.

    Political Crumbs

    Haugh to Reach New Heights

    The North Carolina U.S. Senate race between Democratic incumbent Kay Hagan and Republican Thom Tillis may go down to the wire next Tuesday, but along the way Libertarian nominee Sean Haugh is poised to set a state record for a non-major party candidate. Haugh, who previously won 1.5 percent of the vote in the Tar Heel State's 2002 race, has polled at or above five percent in 10 of the last 12 polls that included his name. The current high water mark for a third party or independent candidate in a North Carolina U.S. Senate election is just 3.3 percent, recorded by Libertarian Robert Emory back in 1992. Only one other candidate has eclipsed the three percent mark - Libertarian Christopher Cole with 3.1 percent in 2008.


    Gubernatorial Highs and Lows

    Two sitting governors currently hold the record for the highest gubernatorial vote ever received in their respective states by a non-incumbent: Republican Matt Mead of Wyoming (65.7 percent in 2010) and outgoing GOPer Dave Heineman of Nebraska (73.4 percent in 2006). Republican Gary Herbert of Utah had not previously won a gubernatorial contest when he notched a state record 64.1 percent for his first victory in 2010, but was an incumbent at the time after ascending to the position in 2009 after the early departure of Jon Huntsman. Meanwhile, two sitting governors hold the record in their states for the lowest mark ever recorded by a winning gubernatorial candidate (incumbent or otherwise): independent-turned-Democrat Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island (36.1 percent in 2010) and Democrat Terry McAuliffe of Virginia (47.8 percent in 2013).


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting