Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Right of Center Third Party Candidates Disappearing in Minnesota

Bookmark and Share

In the last of Smart Politics' series on the decline of third parties in Minnesota, today's entry examines the health of right-of-center third parties in the Gopher State. Previous entries documented how left (Green) and center-left (Independence) parties are, in Minnesota, only shadows of themselves today compared to just 4 years ago. The same can be said for right-leaning parties, such as the limited-government advocating Libertarian Party and the social conservative Constitution Party.

In State Senate races, right-leaning third parties secured 4 spots on the ballot in 2000 (all Constitution Party candidates). By 2002 there were only 2 such candidates (1 Constitution, 1 Independent Christian Pro Life). In 2006 there were none.

A similar story unfolds in State House races: 4 candidates in 2000 (3 Constitution, 1 Libertarian), 1 in 2002 (Constitution), 1 in 2004 (Libertarian), and 0 in 2006.

The 2000 Election was a banner year for the Constitution and Libertarian parties in Minnesota US House races—fielding 6 and 4 candidates respectively (six of which garnered approximately 2 percent of the vote). Since 2000, however, the Libertarian Party hasn't placed a candidate in a US House race, while the Constitution Party has fielded only 1 (MN-07 in 2006).

The percentage of voter support for Constitution and Libertarian presidential candidates has also dropped in Minnesota: by 15 and 27 percent respectively from 2000 to 2004.

Right-of-center third parties have also not fared well of late in races for statewide constitutional offices. In 2002 the Constitution Party fielded a candidate for governor (0.11 percent), but that is the lone entry for all such offices (Attorney General, Secretary of State, State Auditor) this decade.

In US Senate races, the Constitution Party has fielded a candidate in 2000, 2002, and 2006 (earning 0.37, 0.10, and 0.25 percent), while the Libertarian Party last ran a candidate in 2000 (0.27 percent).

Although Minnesota is generally regarded as a blue state, there was a period of time at the early part of this decade when right-leaning third parties were experiencing the same burst in support that the Green Party and Independence Party felt statewide. As of 2006, this momentum has all but evaporated for third parties on both sides of the political spectrum.

Previous post: The Green Party: A Short Half-Life in Minnesota Politics
Next post: Large Electoral Gains by Minority Party Not Uncommon in MN House

1 Comment


  • 2008 will see a resurgence in the Constitution Party. Bet on it.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting