Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


When Words Become Reality: The Media Creation of Barack Obama

Bookmark and Share

Just minutes after the Illinois State Senator's keynote address at the Democratic National Convention on July 27, 2004, media commentators and journalists began to write history by casting Barack Obama in the role of superstar, Democratic leader, and future president of the United States. Perhaps the media did not quite realize at the time that Obama, and a significant wing of the Democratic base, would take their words so seriously, as, less than two years after being elected Senator, Obama is now viewed as a threat to win the Democratic nomination.

After the speech, USA Today referred to Obama as an "emerging star" having "instantly established his credentials as a national political force."

The New Orleans Times-Picayune referenced Obama's "debut star turn," and labled him as "someone already being talked about for a future national ticket."

In The New Republic, Noam Scheiber projected Obama to be "a perennial possibility for a spot on a national Democratic ticket."

As journalistic deadlines approached that Tuesday night, reporters wrote as one, marching to the beat of the same drummer: Obama was a "rising star" (Star Tribune), "one of the Democrats' fastest rising stars" (Cleveland Plain Dealer), a "budding political star" (St. Louis Post Dispatch), and "a rising Democratic star" (Christian Science Monitor).

All these accolades for a man that, even the Post Dispatch acknowledged, had just spoken to a Democratic convention audience (let alone Americans in general) that "knew little or nothing about him."

Several journalists quickly began to make predictions about the fate of this not-yet elected Senator. The Houston Chronicle wrote, "he may well end up the first black president of the United States." A Boston Herald editorial paraphrased a line in Obama's speech thusly: "that brighter day has a name and a year: President Obama, 2016."

Perhaps the media was unaware of the power of their words, and the impatience of the American public—Democrats certainly did not want to wait until 2016 for their next star to shine. Indeed, Obama is currently polling second in (early) polls measuring Democratic support for their nominee in 2008.

Whatever future political success Obama achieves might very well spring directly from the 'uncoordinated, coordinated' media frenzy that occurred in the last week of July 2004. But let us not forget the original architect of this plan: John Kerry. For it was Kerry and his advisors who selected Obama for the 2004 convention keynote address, predicting the State Senator would give a compelling speech and become a popular, new face for the Democratic Party and his campaign. Though, if Kerry would have known just how popular, he may have made a different selection.

Previous post: Upper Midwest Representatives Receive New US House Committee Assignments
Next post: Minnesota's Approval of Pawlenty Job Performance Remarkably Stable

2 Comments


  • only those with brave hearts among the American people will make Obama be their future Leader. a choice to change the life of the suffering Americans who are being threatened all over the Arab Countries. bravo to the Democrats ant to the Americans as abig Family

  • We are seing the results as we speak. it is 2008, and the media has created this candidate, and all I read is how nice Cinderella Obama is, and how bad the new bad wolf of the story is, Hillary Clinton
    The worse part is how the black constituent has forgotten the good relationship and the good deeds the Clintons did for them, and only based on the color of the skin, black voters vote for Obama. This is the most racist group of constituents I have ever seen , voting for a man of inferior qualifications only becuae he is a certain color. I am disgusted at the american media, an empty and shallow media that looks for sensationalism, for paper heroes, for controversy and drama, and sure, they have scored drama, but at what price, our nations future.
    Obama is nothing but media hype, and sure future dissappointments

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting