Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Ford Ran Successful Upper Midwest Presidential Campaign in 1976

Bookmark and Share

The passing of our 38th President Gerald Ford prompted Smart Politics to take a look at his 1976 presidential campaign in the Upper Midwest—and the close races he faced with Jimmy Carter that year.

Richard Nixon—who had nearly swept the nation's electoral votes in 1972—made a clean sweep of the Upper Midwest in that re-election bid. Nixon improved 5 percentage points on his 1968 performance in Iowa, 18 points in Minnesota, and 6 points in Wisconsin (Nixon lost a bit of ground in South Dakota—3 points—facing a candidate, George McGovern, who hailed from that state).

The Watergate scandal—which came to a head with Nixon's resignation just before the 1974 Election—lead the Democrats to increase their majority status in the US House with a large 49-seat net gain (by comparison, the Democrats netted only 30 seats in 2006). However, the scandal did not seem to have legs beyond that election year, with Democrats gaining only one net seat in 1976 House races.

As such, despite his pardoning of Nixon for the Watergate affair, Ford was able to run a fairly competitive campaign in 1976—winning 240 electoral votes across the country, most coming in the West, Northeast, plus two states in the Upper Midwest (Iowa and South Dakota). Both of these races were nail-biters, with Ford nipping Carter by 1 percentage point in each state. Carter meanwhile was able to capture Wisconsin by just 2 points. The only uncompetitive race was in Minnesota, where Ford lost by 13 points.

Previous post: End of the Year Thank You
Next post: Immigration: The Unspoken Issue Facing Minnesota Politics?

1 Comment


  • Gotta love this post. I'm getting my buddy the Nixon 51-30! I hope he enjoys it.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Kevin McCarthy Becomes Least Tenured Floor Leader in US House History

    At less than four terms, McCarthy has served 423 fewer days in the chamber than any floor leader in U.S. House history and almost 10 years less than the average leader.

    Political Crumbs

    The Second Time Around

    Former Republican Congressman Bob Beauprez became the seventh major party or second place gubernatorial candidate in Colorado to get a second chance at the office when he narrowly won his party's nomination last month. Two of the previous six candidates were successful. Democrat Alva Adams lost his first gubernatorial bid to Benjamin Eaton in 1884, but was victorious two years later against William Meyer. Democrat Charles Johnson placed third in 1894 behind Republican Albert McIntyre and Populist incumbent Governor David Waite but returned as the Fusion (Democrat/Populist) nominee in 1898 and defeated GOPer Henry Wolcott. Gubernatorial candidates who received a second chance but lost both general elections include Democrat Thomas Patterson (1888, 1914), Progressive Edward Costigan (1912, 1914), Republican Donald Brotzman (1954, 1956), and Republican David Strickland (1978, 1986).


    How Are the Plurality Winners Doing?

    Nearly 40 percent of plurality winners of U.S. Senate elections lose their seat in the next election cycle. Will that happen to any of the three such incumbents on the ballot in 2014? Recent polling suggests Democrats Al Franken of Minnesota, Mark Begich of Alaska, and Jeff Merkley of Oregon all currently have an advantage over their nominated/frontrunning GOP opponents, but each is flirting with plurality support once again. Franken led endorsed GOPer Mike McFadden 48 to 42 percent in a new SurveyUSA poll while the polling group showed Merkley with a 50 to 32 percent advantage over Monica Wehby. Begich led each of the three major GOP candidates in last month's PPP survey: 42 to 37 percent over Daniel Sullivan, 41 to 33 percent over Mead Treadwell, and 43 to 27 percent over Joe Miller.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting