Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Immigration: The Unspoken Issue Facing Minnesota Politics?

Bookmark and Share

Most Republicans and DFLers at the Minnesota Capitol are in agreement regarding the most important issues to be addressed this year—education, property taxes, transportation, health care etc. But there is one concern to many Minnesotans that remains bubbling beneath the surface of these top-tier issues that virtually no officeholder seems eager to discuss, let alone take affirmative measures to address: immigration.

Immigration has usually been regarded by Minnesotans (and, most likely, most non-southern border states) as not much of a concern at all, or, if anything, a national and not a state problem. However, in 2006, for the first time in at least a generation immigration registered prominently in the Star Tribune Minnesota Poll asking Minnesotans what is the most important problem facing the state of Minnesota. From 1985 to 2005 not even 1 percent of respondents to the MN Poll had ever mentioned 'immigration' as the top problem for the state. Last July, however, immigration ranked as the seventh highest issue, with 4 percent of Gopher State residents naming immigration as the top state problem.

While more in depth state polling has not been conducted addressing why there has been a change in the concern over immigration, there are a number of possible explanations. First, immigration as a national concern became a top-tier issue during the past few years—heightened by the attention to border security driven by stories about the Minutemen, President George W. Bush's ordering of thousands of national guard troops to back up the U.S. Border Patrol, and harsh criticisms within the Republican Party that Bush was not doing enough on this issue. The national prominence of immigration policy may have caused it to seep over a bit into the realm of state politics.

Secondly, the number of immigrants has increased in the state of Minnesota during recent years. The visibility of this trend in immigration is particularly strong because many of the immigrants are non-white - notably Hmong, Somalian, and Latino.

Thirdly, news stories about illegal immigration in the state are now beginning to bubble up in the media. For example, last month a raid on Swift & Co.'s Worthington, Minnesota meat processing plant was a big story: more than two hundred immigrants were arrested on charges ranging from immigration violations to identity theft. The legal fate of the company is not yet settled.

It is not quite clear for how long Minnesotans will continue to view immigration as a second-tier problem facing the state. Unless or until it emerges (and sustains itself) as a top-tier state problem in the eyes of voters, it is unlikely officeholders in St. Paul will want to go anywhere near this issue. The state's only semi-vocal anti-illegal immigration statewide candidate in 2006, GOP U.S. Senate nominee Mark Kennedy, was defeated soundly in last November's election (although that likely had more to do with national politics than his stand on immigration). Tim Pawlenty, meanwhile, drew both fire and praise when, in July 2006, he pledged up to 200 Minnesota National Guard troops to be sent to the southern border under the border protection program outlined by President Bush.

Previous post: Ford Ran Successful Upper Midwest Presidential Campaign in 1976
Next post: Smart Politics Meets Twin Cities Public Television

3 Comments


  • I believe the media coverage and endless national debate on illegal immigrants are driving this shift among Minnesotans, not because illegal immigrantion has made a more significant impact on them than previous years. It will certainly get even more interesting when CIR is officially brought up to the table.

  • I believe the media coverage and endless national debate on illegal immigrants are driving this shift among Minnesotans, not because illegal immigrantion has made a more significant impact on them than previous years. It will certainly get even more interesting when CIR is officially brought up to the table.

  • The Bush administration is pushing through a broad array of foreign weapons deals as it seeks to rearm Iraq and Afghanistan, contain North Korea and Iran, and solidify ties with onetime Russian allies

    We must stop this Now
    http://www.fargophantom.com

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Strange Bedfellows: A Historical Review of Divided US Senate Delegations

    Over the last century, states have been twice as likely to be represented by a single political party in the U.S. Senate than have a split delegation; only Delaware, Iowa, and Illinois have been divided more than half the time.

    Political Crumbs

    Haugh to Reach New Heights

    The North Carolina U.S. Senate race between Democratic incumbent Kay Hagan and Republican Thom Tillis may go down to the wire next Tuesday, but along the way Libertarian nominee Sean Haugh is poised to set a state record for a non-major party candidate. Haugh, who previously won 1.5 percent of the vote in the Tar Heel State's 2002 race, has polled at or above five percent in 10 of the last 12 polls that included his name. The current high water mark for a third party or independent candidate in a North Carolina U.S. Senate election is just 3.3 percent, recorded by Libertarian Robert Emory back in 1992. Only one other candidate has eclipsed the three percent mark - Libertarian Christopher Cole with 3.1 percent in 2008.


    Gubernatorial Highs and Lows

    Two sitting governors currently hold the record for the highest gubernatorial vote ever received in their respective states by a non-incumbent: Republican Matt Mead of Wyoming (65.7 percent in 2010) and outgoing GOPer Dave Heineman of Nebraska (73.4 percent in 2006). Republican Gary Herbert of Utah had not previously won a gubernatorial contest when he notched a state record 64.1 percent for his first victory in 2010, but was an incumbent at the time after ascending to the position in 2009 after the early departure of Jon Huntsman. Meanwhile, two sitting governors hold the record in their states for the lowest mark ever recorded by a winning gubernatorial candidate (incumbent or otherwise): independent-turned-Democrat Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island (36.1 percent in 2010) and Democrat Terry McAuliffe of Virginia (47.8 percent in 2013).


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting