Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Edwards Support in Wisconsin at Half 2004 Level

Bookmark and Share

The first public opinion poll measuring support for 2008 presidential candidates in Wisconsin was released this week by Strategic Vision—a Republican research firm. On the Democratic side, Hillary Clinton was the favorite of 36 percent of the 800 likely voters polled, followed by Barack Obama at 21 percent.

Former Senator John Edwards , who ran a very strong campaign in the Badger State in 2004, polled at only 17 percent—or just half the level of support he received in the 2004 Wisconsin primary. In 2004, as Howard Dean's campaign went into a tailspin in late January and February of that year, Edwards was a large beneficiary in the movement of Dean supporters to other campaings; Edwards garnered a surprising 34 percent of the primary vote in Wisconsin and 24 delegates, just six behind John Kerry's 30 delegates. The fate of Edwards' 2008 presidential bid may not be determined by whether he can ultimately catch Hillary Clinton, but whether or not Al Gore decides to enter the race.

Wesley Clark and Dennis Kucinich are the only other Democratic candidates listed in this survey who were on the 2004 primary ballot in Wisconsin. Clark—who has not yet announced his candidacy—polled at 5 percent, more than twice the amount of support he received in 2004 in the Wisconsin primary (2 percent). Kucinich polled at just 1 percent in the Strategic Vision poll, less than the 3 percent he received in 2004 when he was one of the few Democratic candidates who spoke openly against the Iraq war (along with Howard Dean).

Democratic Wisconsinites overwhelmingly disapprove of Bush's handling of the Iraq War (71 to 21 percent), though only 34 percent believe Congressional Democrats have a better plan to resolve the conflict. Nearly half of the polling sample (49 percent) want Congress to deny funding to send additional troops to Iraq and a majority (57 percent) want a withdrawal of all troops from the country within six months.

Previous post: Global Warming Acknowledged in Upper Midwest
Next post: Tax Increases Not a Deal Breaker in Minnesota

1 Comment


  • I encourage everyone to ignore all the polls for now since most can be one sided depending upon who takes them. Consider exit polls for the last two election that both showed a democrat win and that those specific polls have never in history been so wrong to see the opposite party win.

    Go with your gut feeling and don't be swayed on your vote because someone tells you "they are winning" as if you should run with the masses. If you look at history the 2008 winner will be a democrat; how, because since Kennedy the Republicians have smothered America both financially and under the war machines to only pass along their mess to the democrats usually 8 years later. Then it takes 2 years for fiscal irresponsability to unfold, the Republicians then can blame it on the Democrats and win back the white house 4 years later, to then rape America and us Americans again.

    Look into yourself for a poll, there it cannot be wrong. Don't let the poll makers/takers decide for you...

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Strange Bedfellows: A Historical Review of Divided US Senate Delegations

    Over the last century, states have been twice as likely to be represented by a single political party in the U.S. Senate than have a split delegation; only Delaware, Iowa, and Illinois have been divided more than half the time.

    Political Crumbs

    Haugh to Reach New Heights

    The North Carolina U.S. Senate race between Democratic incumbent Kay Hagan and Republican Thom Tillis may go down to the wire next Tuesday, but along the way Libertarian nominee Sean Haugh is poised to set a state record for a non-major party candidate. Haugh, who previously won 1.5 percent of the vote in the Tar Heel State's 2002 race, has polled at or above five percent in 10 of the last 12 polls that included his name. The current high water mark for a third party or independent candidate in a North Carolina U.S. Senate election is just 3.3 percent, recorded by Libertarian Robert Emory back in 1992. Only one other candidate has eclipsed the three percent mark - Libertarian Christopher Cole with 3.1 percent in 2008.


    Gubernatorial Highs and Lows

    Two sitting governors currently hold the record for the highest gubernatorial vote ever received in their respective states by a non-incumbent: Republican Matt Mead of Wyoming (65.7 percent in 2010) and outgoing GOPer Dave Heineman of Nebraska (73.4 percent in 2006). Republican Gary Herbert of Utah had not previously won a gubernatorial contest when he notched a state record 64.1 percent for his first victory in 2010, but was an incumbent at the time after ascending to the position in 2009 after the early departure of Jon Huntsman. Meanwhile, two sitting governors hold the record in their states for the lowest mark ever recorded by a winning gubernatorial candidate (incumbent or otherwise): independent-turned-Democrat Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island (36.1 percent in 2010) and Democrat Terry McAuliffe of Virginia (47.8 percent in 2013).


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting