Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Tim Walz Plays Hardball...and Goes Hitless

Bookmark and Share

On Tuesday afternoon rookie Minnesota Congressman Tim Walz (MN-01) was interviewed by Chris Matthews on MSNBC's political show Hardball. Earlier in the day Walz had spoken multiple times on the floor of the U.S. House supporting a Democrat-backed resolution criticizing President George W. Bush's decision to add more troops to Iraq.

Walz's counterpart on Hardball was Representative Jack Kingston of Georgia; though Kingston is also a new member of the House, he put Walz on the defensive throughout most of the interview.

Kingston stated Democrats needed to come up with an actual plan and "put their money where their mouth is" instead of focusing on non-binding resolutions.

Walz countered that the Democrats did have a plan—but he focused on generalities, such as fixing the "failed plan and failed policy" of the Bush administration and better "securing the nation from the war on terror."

Kingston took advantage of his minority party status and pounced on Walz:

"You guys are now in the front seat, get out of the backseat and start driving the car. This is a non-binding, silly, intramural resolution...If this thing is a lost cause ... why are we spending more and more days there. Why not introduce an immediate withdrawal? ... If we are fighting a lost cause we need to bring the troops home tomorrow."

Walz seemed uncomfortable with the position Kingston had placed him, and the Minnesota Congressman faced the camera speechless for nearly 5 seconds.

When asked by Matthews if there would be a vote on funding for the war sometime this year, Walz said 'yes.'

Previous post: New Zogby IA Poll Shows Momentum for Clinton
Next post: Franken Announces Senate Candidacy; Starts 22 Points in the Hole

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Which States Own the Best Track Record in Backing Eventual GOP Presidential Nominees?

Nine states (each with primaries) have an unblemished record in voting for the eventual Republican nominee since 1976 - and not all host contests on the back end of the calendar.

Political Crumbs

Evolving?

When Scott Walker "punted" back in February after being asked if he was comfortable with the idea of evolution he added, "That's a question a politician shouldn't be involved in one way or the other." However, it may very well be a question that is asked at one of the upcoming GOP debates this year. In South Carolina during the first GOP debate in 2012, FOX News' Juan Williams asked Tim Pawlenty, "Do you equate the teaching of creationism with the teaching of evolution as the basis for what should be taught for our nation's schools?" Pawlenty replied, "There should be room in the curriculum for study of intelligent design" but that it was up to the local school districts if it should be in a science class or comparative theory class. At the fourth Republican debate held in California, Jon Huntsman addressed the GOP becoming "anti-science" thusly: "Listen, when you make comments that fly in the face of what 98 out of 100 climate scientists have said, when you call into question the science of evolution, all I'm saying is that, in order for the Republican Party to win, we can't run from science. We can't run from mainstream conservative philosophy."


73 Months and Counting

January's preliminary Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show Minnesota's unemployment rate of 3.7 percent was once again lower than Wisconsin's 5.0 percent. That marks the 73rd consecutive month in which Minnesota has boasted a lower jobless rate than its neighbor to the east dating back to January 2009 including each of the last 67 months by at least one point. The Gopher State has now edged Wisconsin in the employment border battle for 204 of the last 216 months dating back to February 1997. Wisconsin only managed a lower unemployment rate than Minnesota for the 12 months of 2008 during this 18-year span.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting