Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Smoking in MN: Yes in Bars, No in Restaurants

Bookmark and Share

The public opinion firm SurveyUSA recently released a series of questions asked of a random sample of 500 adults in Minnesota addressing a variety of social public policy issues on the state's legislative agenda.

Regarding the proposed smoking ban taken up by the legislature this session, a plurality of 41 percent of Minnesotans support a complete ban on smoking in all restaurants and bars across the state. However, 36 percent would only ban smoking in restaurants, and 22 percent would permit smoking in both classes of establishments.

According to the Center for Disease Control, the smoking rate in the Gopher State is just 20.7 percent. Therefore, even though smokers comprise a small minority of the state's population, a full 58 percent nonetheless believe the state should not intervene on their current right to smoke in bars (note: several cities, including Minneapolis, have instituted smoking bans in restaurants and bars that supercede state regulations).

Minnesota's smoking rate of 20.7 percent is the 23rd lowest in the United States, just below the national average of 20.9 percent. The rate in other Upper Midwestern states was quite similar to that of Minnesota: South Dakota at 20.3 percent, Iowa at 20.8 percent, and Wisconsin at 22.0 percent. As in most states, more men currently smoke in Minnesota (22.0 percent) than do women (19.5 percent).

Previous post: Female Legislators in MN At Record High; IA, WI, and SD Lag Behind National Average
Next post: Scooter Libby Felony Conviction Fallout

8 Comments


  • That survey result is not backed up by any other polls on the same subject, which is curious.

    A single poll result does not a trend make.

  • That's quite true. In fact, when MPR / Pioneer Press asked a similar (though more generally worded question) back in May 2004, 52 percent of Minnesotans supported the ban in "most public places including restaurants and bars," with only 40 percent opposed. However, the danger with that poll is it only offers two choices for respondents. The SurveyUSA poll offers 3 choices and therefore may better represent the true views of the state.

  • I remember that poll. May 2004 seems like a lifetime ago now. That was when the second big wave of city and county ordinances were being passed.

    There is some evidence that a "third wave" of local ordinances is building. Many local officials are quite frustrated at the state's lack of action on this issue. Olmsted County comes to mind, as does Carlton County and the City of Hutchinson.

    One of the more interesting factoids I have gleaned from few polls that ask for respondents political leanings is that Minnesota Republicans favor a comprehensive statewide smoking ban more than any other group.

    In any case, I'll keep an eye on any future polls to see if there really is a trend starting.

  • > One of the more interesting factoids I have gleaned from few polls that ask for respondents political leanings is that Minnesota Republicans favor a comprehensive statewide smoking ban more than any other group.

    Actually, in the SurveyUSA poll, the support for a ban on both restaurants and bars was much higher among Democrats (49%) and independents (41%) than Republicans (35%). Though more independents (30%) want smoking permitted in both, compared to the GOP (18%) and Democrats (17%).

  • Yet another reason to wonder, as two previous surveys had suggested the opposite.

    In any case, it is the Republicans and Democrats in the House, Senate and Governor's Office who have the ball now. The bill clearly has bipartisan suport, as well as some bipartisan opposition.

    The Governor has signalled his intention to sign the bill, no doubt that should carry some weight on both sides of the aisle.

  • Who commissioned this SurveyUSA poll? I doubt this poll was conducted by SurveyUSA without someone footing the bill. Just wondering since both RJR Nabisco Inc. and Philip Morris Companies, Inc. are among the corporate clients of SurveyUSA. Maybe someone would like to do some investigative journalism and find out who paid to have this survey conducted.

  • The poll sponsor was actually KSTP-TV Minneapolis.

  • smking is rong it destuse themself and other peole to

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting