Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Live Blog: Rep. Walz Event

Bookmark and Share

10:00 am. Freshman Democratic congressman Tim Walz's (MN-01) talk today is entitled "Tomorrow's Foreign Policy: What We're Teaching Today's Students and Why It Matters."

10:10 am. Walz begins his talk by discussing the importance of opening a line of communication between citizens and the government. He explains how his first 100 days of Congress have been dominated by foreign policy legislation. Gallup polling has demonstrated America's view of U.S. foreign policy has eroded steeply in recent years. In February 2002 75 percent of Americans believed foreign leaders respected President Bush - five years later, in February 2007, the same poll found that number had dropped to just 21 percent.

10:15 am. "Nuance" is the word of the day -- Walz believes there is too much simplicity in the public discourse on foreign policy. (Walz - a former teacher - is a natural at the podium, rarely speaking from notes, with his baritone voice booming throughout the auditorium). One of the erroneous 'lessons' Americans are being taught, Walz says, is that "everything changed after 9/11." Walz says things may have changed in the United States, but not across the world - and the U.S. must realize this.

10:25 am. Walz acknowledges the U.S. is not viewed very well around the world. Gallup polling on this subject bolsters Walz's point. In February 2002 79 percent of Americans believed the U.S. was viewed favorably in the eyes of the world. By February 2004 that number had fallen to 54 percent. By February 2007 only 45 percent of Americans believed this - with 54 percent believing the U.S. was viewed unfavorably by the world.

10:30 am. Walz says people in Congress are not listening to the rational center - and are instead being driven by 'big ideas' like American exceptionalism. Walz calls the Iraq War one of the most devastating foreign policy acts in U.S. history.

10:35 am. Walz claims the U.S. public education system is presenting a myopic view of American history - with just a fraction of their education devoted to world history. Walz says - although he believes in some educational standards - there must be much greater freedom, creativity, and nuance taught in the educational curriculum.

10:45 am. Walz wonders worries about what the next generation of foreign diplomats will look like as the current group retires and passes on. Walz worries about how this generation is being educated and this will impact future foreign policy decisions. Walz ended his speech after 40 minutes - riveting, and well-received by the audience.

10:48 am. DFL Senate candidate Al Franken is in attendance at Walz's speech - sitting just behind the live bloggers in the electronic media row. Walz now begins to answer questions from Larry Jacobs, Director of the Center for the Study of Politics and Governance, and members of the audience.

10:50 am. With regards to building a coalition in the House among his Democratic colleagues, Walz quoted a fellow party member from Hawaii who said, "If we were in Europe, we'd have 15 different political parties." Walz says that several members on the left-wing of the Democratic party did not think the Iraq Supplemental bill did not go far enough, while Blue Dog democrats did not think it provided enough flexibility.

10:53 am. Walz believes the U.S. combat troops should leave Iraq, and the sooner the better. Walz does concede some U.S. forces should remain - such as special operation forces, who will be needed to help keep in check the estimated 6 percent of insurgents who hail from foreign countries (who Walz believes will continue to wreck havoc in the region even if the U.S. troops leave the country).

10:56 am. Walz rejects the military leadership's view that combat troops will need to remain in Iraq for 5 to 10 years. He says Congress sets the policy, not the military -- U.S. policy is not determined by a military dictatorship.

11:00 am. Walz feels a sense of responsibility to the Iraqi innocents to help prevent a bloodbath if the U.S. leaves. The Congressman cites Colin Powell who stated, "If you broke it, you own it." But Walz says this is something the world community can help assist the U.S. in doing.

11:05 am. Walz says the U.S. cannot afford the Iraq war financially as well - especially with regards to the budget President Bush has proposed for 2008. The Congressman implies the U.S. needs to better balance security with the American tradition of openness to the world - and not turn inwards to build walls, missile shields etc.

11:08 am. Walz criticizes President Bush for cutting spending on the care of veterans. He also rips Bush for nominating a former GOP Party chair (Jim Nicholson) as the Secretary for Veterans Affairs.

11:10 am. The Walz event comes to a close...

Previous post: Smart Politics Live Blogging At Walz Event
Next post: Live Blog at GOP Events Announced

3 Comments


  • "Walz believes there is too much simplicity in the public discourse on foreign policy."

    Well, that extends well beyond foreign policy. It's a fine balance of explaining the complexities of the subject without taking it to a level that the general populice will struggle with.

  • Whenever you see a relatively minor war or international conflict, which is what Iraq really is (compare it to WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, etc) you have to suspect about how much influence it really has on a country's reputation.

    I'd have to say that Iraq was an excuse for a lot of nations to vent a lot of other things that they were already angry about.

    China has been angry at the US' dominance over Asia, especially with our relationship with Taiwan and our criticism over China's human rights policies and policies in Tibet.

    We have been activetly working to contain Russia, well after 1991. Also there is the ballistic missile defense shield with upsets them.

    France has always been anti-American and hates "Anlgo" culture and economic reforms which they fear they have to accept.

    The Muslim world is angry at us for our support over Israel.

    I think that perhaps the 2003 invasion of Iraq was the last needle on the camel's back for some.


    PA

  • I think its really important that government officials listen to people's ideas, feelings, and outcries. They must have good communication skills to work with the people. Knowing what the people think and how they feel, they will know what's best to do for the country and for the people.

    Having good communication with the people can help them work hand in hand with the people and for people to cooperate as well. It helps build a good relationship with them.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting