Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Sen. Feingold Calls for Censure of President Bush

Bookmark and Share

Wisconsin Democratic junior Senator Russ Feingold called for the censure of President George W. Bush on Sunday. Feingold issued a press release stating he will introduce two censure resolutions condemning not only President Bush, but also Vice President Dick Cheney and other administration officials for "misconduct relating to the war in Iraq and for their repeated assaults on the rule of law."

Censure of a U.S. President by the Senate is exceedingly rare—Andrew Jackson was censured in 1834 as an outgrowth of his opposition to the funding of the National Bank of the United States, which he sought to abolish. That censure was expunged from the Senate record some three years later after the Democratic Party gained majority control of the body.

Feingold himself introduced a resolution to censure the President nearly a year and a half ago—in March 2006—for misleading Congress about the NSA wiretapping program. Only a few Senators signed on as co-sponsors to that volatile legislation. Introduced under Republican control, the resolution never received a floor vote.

In this new call for censure, Feingold adds additional claims of misconduct to the wiretapping case:

The first resolution will condemn the President and others for misconduct relating to the war in Iraq including:

Overstating the case that Saddam Hussein had WMD, particularly nuclear weapons, and falsely implying a relationship with al Qaeda and links to 9/11.

Failing to plan for the civil conflict and humanitarian problems that the intelligence community predicted.

Over-stretching the Army, Marine Corps and Guard with prolonged deployments.Justifying our military involvement in Iraq by repeatedly distorting the situation on the ground there.

The second resolution will focus on the administration's attack on the rule of law with respect to, among other things:

The illegal NSA warrantless wiretapping program.

Extreme policies on torture, the Geneva Conventions, and detainees at Guantanamo.

The refusal to recognize legitimate congressional oversight into the improper firings of U.S. Attorneys.

Feingold's press release also states he welcomes Americans to email suggestions of what to include in the censure resolution.

Previous post: Bush Ratings Tumble To Record Lows in Iowa
Next post: Franken vs. Coleman: Clinton vs. Lazio Revisited?

1 Comment


  • I am completely amazed how the Bush Administration has been able to get away with their terrible acts. They referred to Bill Clinton as "Slick Willie"..... He left the country with a budget surplus and contained terrorists. The Bush Administration has put us in debt for a very, very long time and helped terrorists gain support......... My heart aches

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting