Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Will 3rd Party Candidates Tilt MN 2008 Senate Race?

Bookmark and Share

As a recent SurveyUSA poll showed Norm Coleman's lead over both Al Franken and Mike Cerisi down to low single digits, the question emerges as to whether or not the introduction of a viable third party candidate in the race could influence the outcome.

In two of the past three Minnesota U.S. Senate races (2000, 2002), votes for third party candidates were greater than the margin of victory in the race. In fact, third party support in Senate races in Minnesota since 1996 is greater than any other of the dozen states in the Midwest.

Third party candidates have averaged 5.9 percent of the vote in the Gopher State, with Indiana coming in second at 4.2 percent. No other state averages even half the turnout for third party candidates than in Minnesota.

Minnesota also leads the Midwest in third party turnout for President (7.3 percent), U.S. House candidates (4.2 percent), and gubernatorial candidates (21.5 percent) since 1996.

The conventional wisdom is that third party candidates leaning to the left (Green, Independence) will hurt the DFL nominee more than right-leaning third party candidates (Constitution) will hurt the Republican nominee. Support for the former has been much stronger in Minnesota U.S. Senate elections than for the latter, but, in 2008, the strength of third party candidacies may hinge on whether Al Franken or Mike Ciresi is the DFL nominee. Franken—because he is a newcomer with a non-traditional political pedigree—may be more able to attract those voters who would normally abandon a major party nominee than Ciresi (a lawyer, though not a career politician by any means).

The third party factor could just be the slight edge Norm Coleman needs to retain his Senate seat for a second term.

Previous post: Midwestern GOP Senators Quick to Comment on Bush's Speech
Next post: DFL Prospects in Ramstad's 3rd CD Open Seat

3 Comments


  • Minnesota better start taking politics a little more seriously. You seem to think its funny to elect unqualified candidates

  • www.rcjorgensen2008.com
    Change is not Obama from Harvard nor Clinton from Yale, Bush's Almamater. If you want change rock the vote and elect the first write in Candidate! Write in RC Jorgensen this November. Justice served.

  • Served "General Indictment"
    to the White 3/29/2004 arrested and cuffed and stuffed with no lock on Handcuffs, cut wrists and was released. Bush and Cheney broke federal contracting laws giving no bid contracts to Haliburton.= Stealing!

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting