Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Live Blogging: Former MN Congressman Vin Weber On the State of the GOP

Bookmark and Share

7:30 a.m. Vin Weber, former 6-term Minnesota Republican U.S. Representative (1981-1993), will be speaking at the Humphrey Institute today on the state of the Republican Party and conservatism. Despite generally low approval of the job the Democrats have done since seizing control of the U.S. House and Senate with last fall's elections, Democrats still dominate the GOP in generic poll matchups. Early November CNN and Rasmussen polls give Democrats an 11-point advantage, while an NBC poll gives Democrats a 9-point spread. When Democrats were elected in a mini-landslide last November, several surveys showed the Democrats with a 15 to 20 point lead the week before the election.

7:55 a.m. Weber starts out by saying things "ain't that good right now" for the Republican Party, with the decline starting about three years ago. Weber notes that Democrats hold a 12-point advantage in party identification nationally. (Note: in Minnesota, an average of 11 SurveyUSA polls conducted in 2007 finds 37 percent of Minnesotans identify themselves as Democrats, 26 percent as Republicans, and 27 percent as independents.).

8:00 a.m. Weber, who has been involved in the Romney campaign, states he doesn't like the 'national' primary that is going to occur on February 5th, when up to 20 states will hold their primary contests. Weber admits Romney has a two-state strategy (Iowa and New Hampshire) and that Giuliani's national strategy was a mistake: if Giuliani loses Iowa, New Hampshire, Michigan, and South Carolina, he will have a difficult time holding on to his leads in the big states on February 5th.

8:05 a.m. Weber says Fred Thompson got into the race too late and has been relegated to a 'regional' (Southern) candidate, though former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee could displace Thompson as the 'son of the south,' especially if he wins Iowa. Weber is advising Romney on policy, and thinks Giuliani still has the best strategy to win the election.

8:10 a.m. Weber finds that Republicans are having a difficult time advancing a viable economic program, the kind that Ronald Reagan used to build the Republican base in the 1980s by advocating tax cuts in a time of rising inflation. The only proposal that has received some attention is Huckabee's "fair tax" programs, which creates a national sales tax and eliminates the IRS. Weber says this program is unlikely to withstand scrutiny once Huckabee becomes a first-tier candidate (it is estimated the national sales tax would have to be 23 to 30 percent) to replace the money generated by the IRS through income tax).

8:15 a.m. Weber says despite good economic indicators the U.S. electorate is very skeptical and nervous about the economy. Regarding Iraq, Weber finds very little differences between the leading Democratic and Republican presidential candidates. The Democrats are more prone to criticize the past - claiming that Bush misled the country etc. - but that Obama, Clinton, and Edwards all believe troops will need to be in Iraq for at least another 16 months.

8:20 a.m. Regarding social issues, Weber notes that the increase in support for Huckabee is largely coming from the evangelicals, and that having a single-constituency base will not get him the nomination. Weber says abortion and gay marriage has been replaced by social conservatives by immigration, and that Romney, Giuliani, and McCain all had moderate views on immigration at the beginning of their campaigns. When they go to Iowa, however, they soon shifted their views toward more restrictive positions, as it became clear this was the number one policy concern of Iowans.

8:30 a.m. In a question and answer session with CSPG Director Larry Jacobs, Weber says that the Republican Party makes a mistake if it assumes evangelicals will vote for the GOP nominee even if he is liberal on social issues (e.g. Giuliani). He notes this evangelical tradition is rooted in democratic populism, and that a portion of this Republican base will bolt if the nominee does not align with their views. All it takes is a few percent to not vote, or to vote for a third party, to transform the 2008 election into a big win for the Democrats, across the midwest as well as some southern states.

8:45 a.m. Weber states he does not believe the invasion of Iraq was fundamentally wrong, but that it was fundamentally implemented in the wrong way and, knowing what we know now, at the wrong time. Weber acknowledges that even though most estimates indicate things are improving in Iraq, Republicans should not take solace in this because most Americans believe the Iraq war was simply not worth it.

8:50 a.m. When asked why he chose to support Romney instead of John McCain, Weber says he did not think McCain was interested in domestic policies - such as environmental issues - plus McCain is now viewed as a Washington insider (and identified with support of the Iraq war). Weber believes a Republican can only win the White House in '08 if he is not associated with Washington, D.C.

8:55 a.m. Weber does not believe New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg will run as an independent for president, but, if he does, he will ultimately hurt the Democratic nominee more than the Republican nominee, as the most likely states he could win are the bigger, industrialized states - most of which were carried by Gore and Kerry, not Bush.

Previous post: Democratic Race in Iowa Remains Deadlocked
Next post: Iowa Poll: More Good News For Huckabee and Obama

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Gender Equality in the US House: A State-by State Quarter-Century Report Card (1989-2014)

A study of 5,325 congressional elections finds the number of female U.S. Representatives has more than tripled over the last 25 years, but the rate at which women are elected to the chamber still varies greatly between the states.

Political Crumbs

Final Four Has Presidential Approval

By edging Michigan in the final seconds Sunday, the University of Kentucky guaranteed that one school in the Final Four this year would be located in a state that was not carried by President Barack Obama in 2012. (Connecticut, Florida, and Wisconsin had previously earned Final Four slots over the weekend). Across the 76 Final Fours since 1939, an average of 3.1 schools have been located in states won by the president's ticket during the previous election cycle. All four schools have come from states won by the president 29 times, with the most recent being the 2009 Final Four featuring Connecticut, Michigan State, North Carolina, and Villanova. On 30 occasions three Final Four schools have been located in states won by the president, with two schools 11 times and only one school six times (the most recent being 2012 with Kansas, Kentucky, Louisville, and Ohio State). There has never been a Men's NCAA Division I Final Four in which no schools were located in states carried by the president's ticket.


Three for the Road

A new Rasmussen Poll shows Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker in a dead heat with likely 2014 Democratic nominee Mary Burke. Walker is seeking to win his third consecutive election after prevailing in 2012's recall contest. Eight of his predecessors accomplished this feat: Republicans Lucius Fairchild (in 1869), Jeremiah Rusk (1886), Robert La Follette (1904), Emanuel Philipp (1918), John Blaine (1924), Walter Kohler (1954), Warren Knowles (1968), and Tommy Thompson (1994). Three others Badger State governors lost on their third campaign: Democrat George Peck (1894), Progressive Philip La Follette (1938), and Republican Julius Heil (1942). One died in office before having the opportunity to win a third contest (GOPer Walter Goodland in 1947) while another resigned beforehand (Democrat Patrick Lucey in 1977 to become Ambassador to Mexico). Overall Wisconsin gubernatorial incumbents have won 35 of 47 general election contests, or 74.5 percent of the time.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting