Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


What Will Stop The Huckabee Surge?

Bookmark and Share

While Mike Huckabee's rise to the top of the Republican polls nationwide and in key states (Iowa, South Carolina, and Michigan) appears unstoppable, this, of course, is not the nature of politics. For example, in the 2004 presidential campaign, the rise and the fall of Howard Dean's candidacy were equally pronounced and swift.

How was Huckabee able to rise in the polls so quickly? Huckabee was polling in the very low single digits through July 2007—along side the likes of Tom Tancredo and Duncan Hunter. Tancredo and Hunter remain in the low single digits, while Huckabee frequently surpasses 20 percent in statewide and national polls.

Some speculate Huckabee's surge is due to his luring Christian conservatives and evangelicals. This is the 'how' but not the 'why.' Tancredo and Hunter are both staunch conservatives, and Tancredo (along with Huckabee and Sam Brownback) was one of the three Republicans to raise their hand an early 2008 GOP debate indicating that they believe in creationism.

Huckabee was able to move past the lowest-tier in the polls not because his conservative credentials are any more noteworthy than several other lower-tier Republican candidates, but because of his powerful debate performances, and the positive press it garnered. Huckabee's speaking style and cadence is unlike any other of the GOP hopefuls—coming across as natural, steady, sincere, and caring. Huckabee's religious background no doubt has served him well on the campaign trail.

But what could derail the Huckabee train? Most pundits predicting his downfall are pointing to his not-conservative-enough record as Governor of Arkansas—his commutation of prison sentences, his support of giving higher education tuition breaks to the children of illegal aliens, and his tax and spend policies.

This record will certainly not help Huckabee, but it is not his policies that led him to the top of the field to begin with—it is his demeanor and character. It is not, therefore, the attack ads (and one was lanuched this week by Mitt Romney) that will do the most damage to Huckabee; these are expected to surface against any top-tier candidate. It is Huckabee's response to these ads that could hurt him. If Huckabee starts to sound negative—and starts to sound like the other candidates—then his tenuous support will begin to crumble.

An example of what could get Huckabee in trouble is his quote in a New York Times magazine article in which he asks, "Don't Mormons believe that Jesus and the devil are brothers?" (a not-so-disguised attack on Romney). Republicans, even the evangelical conservatives who have been flocking to his side in recent months, do not want Huckabee The Attack Dog or Huckabee The Intolerant. This is especially so in Iowa (where negative ads by Dick Gephardt during his 2004 presidential run led to a 4th place finish and ended his campaign). How Huckabee handles Romney's attacks will go a long way in defining these next few weeks. Huckabee needs to respond, but he must respond with a positive message to keep his (very positive) image in tact.

Previous post: A Thompson Leads GOP Pack in Wisconsin? (Fred, Not Tommy)
Next post: Obama, Huckabee On Top In Two New Iowa Polls

3 Comments


  • What will stop the surge? Not that policy or ideas ever have anything to do with elections, but if they did, this sums it up pretty well:

    http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2007_12/012691.php

    From a straight horse race perspective, isn't it a little late in the game for him to have no money?

  • Here are some great excerpts from his 1998 book:

    Abortion, environmentalism, AIDS, pornography, drug abuse, and homosexual activism have fragmented and polarized our communities.

    It is now difficult to keep track of the vast array of publicly endorsed and institutionally supported aberrations—from homosexuality and pedophilia to sadomasochism and necrophilia.

    Nothing worse than environmentalism, except for institutionally supported necrophilia.

  • Help us to stop Mike Huckabee! Visit us today and participate in our website! We will previal. StopHuckabeeNow.com

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting