Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Wisconsinites Overwhelmingly Back Tough Measures Against Illegal Immigrants

Bookmark and Share

A new poll of 500 likely Wisconsin voters by Rasmussen Reports demonstrates how immigration remains a largely non-partisan issue among the electorate, even while there is a partisan divide on the issue between the Republican and Democratic presidential candidates.

Wisconsin has voted Democratic in each of the last 7 elections for U.S. Senate and 5 presidential elections dating back to 1988. Democratic presidential candidates also currently lead in most matchup polls between Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and John Edwards against Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, John McCain, and Mike Huckabee respectively.

Whether or not immigration will become an issue that significantly impacts vote choice in 2008 remains to be seen, but the overwhelming views of the Wisconsin electorate match up much more cleanly with the GOP side of the ticket.

Rasmussen's poll, conducted December 5th, found nearly three-fourths of Wisconsinites (74 percent) believe police officers should automatically check to see if a person is in the country legally as a routine matter when pulling someone over for a simple traffic violation. Only 19 percent were opposed.

Respondents were not concerned that this immigration status check could lead to discrimination against people based on their skin color, their accent, or name (just 32 percent thought this process could lead to discrimination).

If the police officer discovers the person in question is an illegal immigrant, more than half of likely voters in Wisconsin believe that person should be deported. In fact, those in support of deportation outnumber those that oppose the measure by a 2.5 to 1 margin (53 percent to 21 percent; 25 percent were uncertain).

Only 11 percent of Wisconsinites believe undocumented immigrants should be allowed to get driver's licenses, with 79 percent opposed. Hillary Clinton ran into trouble with that issue in a debate several weeks ago when she indicated she supported the Governor of New York's (now defunct) plan to issue licenses to illegal immigrants. In Wisconsin, this is clearly not a winning stance to take.

Respondents in Wisconsin also overwhelmingly believe English should be the official language of the United States (by an 89 percent to 8 percent margin), while 76 percent believe businesses should be allowed to require its employees speak English while on the job (with only 12 percent disagreeing).

Illegal immigration has also been charting as a top five most important problem in recent national polls (NBC News/ Wall Street Journal, LA Times/Bloomberg, CBS News/New York Times). If it remains a hot-button issue throughout the 2008 campaign, Democrats could find themselves in trouble even in blue-leaning states, such as Wisconsin, where nearly all Republicans, the vast majority of independents, and approximately half of Democrats disagree with the policy positions of the leading Democratic candidates.

Previous post: McClatchy/MSNBC Poll: Huckabee Up Double Digits In Iowa
Next post: A Thompson Leads GOP Pack in Wisconsin? (Fred, Not Tommy)

4 Comments


  • You may wish to post this news to your readers or e-mail group/s...

    There is a new BILL proposal coming out of the grass roots community (Patriot Union) called the Safe America Act that proposes an innovative way to secure the borders within 6 months and remove all illegal aliens from US soil within 16 months or less without a need to "round up" anyone. Plan says it saves US taxpayers trillions of dollars avoiding a costly amnesty. Check it out at http://www.patriotunion.org/reform.htm

    Roco

  • HOW TO FIX US BROKEN IMMIGRTION SYSTEM
    STEP1 DEPORT JANET NAPOLITANO(D)GOV.AZ
    STEP2 DEPORT EMILIO GONZALEZ USCIS
    STEP3 DEPORT DAVID AGUILAR USCBP
    STEP4 DEPORT ALL BUSH FAMILY LATINO ALIENS
    STEP5 VOTE ALL(R)O8

  • Fight illegal immigration. Contact your elected reps. and demand they co-sponsor the Save Act. The House bill is HR 4088. The Senate bill is S2368.

    Visit NumbersUSA for more details.- http://www.numbersusa.com/actionbuffet

    Only vote for candidates willing to support this bill. It forces all employers to verify social security numbers.

    Let's take our country back !

  • roco,

    I'm with you on all of that but one.

    If i see any republican with a CFR/TC/Bilderburger membership in his resume he is a goner.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting