Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


The Great Fall of the Rudy Giuliani Presidential Campaign

Bookmark and Share

Because Rudy Giuliani's presidential campaign has taken the (now much criticized tactic) of focusing most of its energy and resources on winning the state of Florida, he has fallen so much out of the national spotlight in recent weeks that his lead has evaporated in not only national polls, but also what were considered "sure-bet" (and delegate rich) states like New York, New Jersey, and California.

The extent of Giuliani's fall is remarkable. The former New York mayor's miscalculation over a month ago was that it was worse for his campaign to compete and lose in the early states than to not compete and end up in fourth, fifth, or even sixth place. As a result of this strategy, for the entire month of January, all the media coverage was on the Republican candidates who were winning states—Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, and John McCain.

If Giuliani was mentioned, it was in the context of the 'Florida firewall' or how poorly he had done in these key early states: 6th place in Iowa (3 percent), tied for last place in Wyoming (0 percent), 4th place in New Hampshire (9 percent), 6th place in Michigan (3 percent), 6th place in Nevada (4 percent), and 6th place in South Carolina (2 percent). Giuliani has only beaten Ron Paul in one state, New Hampshire, and that was by just one point.

Worse yet, Giuliani had been leading in the polls in nearly all of these states: in Iowa and New Hampshire as late as the end of July (ARG), in Michigan as late as the middle of November (Detroit News), in South Carolina as late as the end of November (ARG), and in Nevada as late as the first week of December (Mason-Dixon). Thus, these are not states that the Giuliani campaign can say they had no chance of winning all along.

Given the media frenzy toward Huckabee, Romney, and, particularly John McCain, Giuliani now also trails in several key states, including Florida. The latest Rasmussen poll of likely Florida GOP primary voters (conducted on January 20th) finds Romney at the top with 25 percent, followed by McCain with 20 percent, Giuliani with 19 percent, Huckabee with 13 percent, Thompson with 12 percent, and Paul with 5 percent.

Astoundingly, Giuliani also trails McCain by double digits in two polls of New Yorkers released today: by 36 to 24 percent in a new Siena poll and by 34 to 19 percent (with Romney at 19 percent as well) in a WNBC/Marist survey.

A Rasmuseen survey of likely New Jersey GOP primary voters gives McCain a 29 to 27 percent lead over Giuliani, within the margin of error.

In a Rasmussen GOP poll in California conducted last week, Giuliani had fallen all the way to 5th place: McCain 24 percent, Romney 17 percent, Huckabee and Thompson 13 percent, and Giuliani 11 percent. Giuliani also trailed McCain in California by 6 points in a CNN/LAT Times poll and by 15 points in a SurveyUSA poll both conducted about a week ago. Giuliani was leading well outside the margin of error in California as late as the middle of December (Field, SurveyUSA).

The problem for Giuliani—even in the unlikely event that he wins Florida—is that there is little time for him to regain his advantage in most of these key Super Tuesday states (there is just a one week buffer). As a result, political scientists, marketing firms, and future campaigns will no doubt use the Giuliani campaign as a case study of what not to do for years to come.

Previous post: Live Blog: South Carolina GOP Primary
Next post: Smart Politics to Live Blog at MN GOP Forum

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting