Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Clinton Braces For Another Obama Sweep

Bookmark and Share

Despite still leading in most national polls, Hillary Clinton is set to get swept by Barack Obama in another round of primary contests tomorrow in Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia.

To no great surprise at Smart Politics, Obama also swept Clinton this weekend, victorious in the states of Washington, Nebraska, Louisiana, and Maine (plus the Virgin Islands). Smart Politics opined last week that too much had been made of Clinton's high-profile victories in New York, Massachusetts, and California on Super Tuesday, and not enough had been made of the fact that Obama had won 13 of 21 contests (with New Mexico results still pending). And the reason is this: whatever momentum and positive media coverage Clinton was to have gained from, say, her victory in California, that was likely to be replaced in the next news cycle with the "Obama sweep," even though that sweep was comprised of less populous states.

On Saturday morning, Smart Politics stated that nearly all the contests between Super Tuesday and March 4th (when Texas and Ohio vote) strongly favored Obama, and that if Clinton had to wait until March 4th to deliver good news, it would be too late. The results are holding true to form, and Obama will make it 7 for 7 in post-Super Tuesday contests Tuesday evening.

While Clinton is leading in the only recent poll of Wisconsinites (who go to the polls on February 19th along with the Hawaii caucuses), expect those numbers to change after the favorable coverage Obama receives after his East Coast sweep and he invests more resources in the Badger State in the coming week.

Clinton has still outpolled Obama in 7 of 10 national surveys conducted this month, but those results are relatively meaningless for the following reason: Obama has the resources to go on the air with ads to change voters' minds in each state that comes up on the calendar. Obama gets in his media buys early and often and, in addition to his strong 'likeability factor,' he will sway the majority of voters in these upcoming states to his side more often that he will not (not to mention that Democrats in many of these states are already on his side).

And as for the new March 4th firewall of Texas and Ohio on which the Clinton campaign is banking? Don't count on it. For three weeks the media will be covering Obama's dominant performances in the post-Super Tuesday primaries, and this will only make Clinton appear as a smaller and smaller candidate.

Previous post: Live Blog: The Maine Caucuses
Next post: Live Blog: Washington D.C. Primary

3 Comments


  • So what would be your advice if you were Senator Clinton's top advisor? Can she make any play at all anymore? Or is it completely out of her hands -- and Obama's game to lose so to speak?

  • Well, one thing that would certainly help Clinton is more strong performances by Mike Huckabee. If John McCain cruises quickly to become the 'official' nominee, then almost all of the reporting in the coming weeks will be on Obama vs. Clinton. If Huckabee pulls a little magic out of his hat, then McCain will get some of the critical commentary that would have otherwise gone almost completely to the Clinton campaign.

  • But that is out of her hands as well.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting