Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Obama's Bandwagon Rides Through Wisconsin

Bookmark and Share

On February 19th, Wisconsin voters will have the somewhat rare opportunity to weigh in on a presidential nomination process while the outcome is at least somewhat in doubt.

As Smart Politics wrote on Monday, Wisconsinites will move in greater numbers to the side of Barack Obama, owing to his sweep through Tuesday's primaries and his increased presence in the Badger State through media buys. But Obama did even better than that by speaking to a capacity crowd at the Kohl Center in Madison last night—the Illinois Senator will no doubt benefit from additional free advertising from subsequent local news coverage.

A new survey by the Republican polling firm Strategic Vision currently gives Obama a 45 to 41 percent edge over Hillary Clinton, but that poll's ending field date was Sunday. Expect the vast majority of undecided voters (14 percent in that poll) and some Clinton supporters to break to Obama in the coming days.

If this blog author has any particular insights into the political climate of the Badger State, it may be attributed, at least at the margins, for having grown up there: in a moderate to conservative rural area, but about an hour away from both Madison and Milwaukee—the liberal strongholds in the state.

Obama will not only draw a significant number of traditional Democratic voters to his side next Tuesday, but also the vast majority of the state's more rabid left wing elements (i.e. Madison). Wisconsin has an open primary, so Obama should also benefit from the state's large number of (disaffected) independents, who will be less tuned in to the nearly decided (and less publicized) Republican race. The independent streak in Wisconsin can be strong: 14 percent of Wisconsin voters in the 2002 Wisconsin Governor's race gave the nod to third party candidates.

In the end, Wisconsin will not be unlike many other states on the campaign trail that have already crossed the path of the Obama momentum machine—getting themselves hitched to a fast-moving bandwagon as it travels from state to state. Clinton strategists know this, and perhaps that is why the New York Senator was in Texas last night (gearing, perhaps, for an Alamo-like defense against this bandwagon). Obama followed his rally in Madison Tuesday evening with multiple additional appearances in Wisconsin today, while Clinton's upcoming schedule is packed with appearances in Texas and Ohio.

But, to be fair, the oncoming shift to Obama in Wisconsin cannot solely be attributed to the fact that Wisconsin likes a winner. For example, while it is true that the number of Green Bay Packer fans increased significantly in the Badger State during Brett Favre's reign, the state still had a substantial core following of the Green and Gold during the two decades of lean years since Vince Lombardi—especially in blue collar towns.

However, it is also true that in Madison (the antithesis of a Wisconsin blue collar town) you did not see many sell-out crowds for Badger football or basketball games prior to the arrival in the 1990s of star head coaches Barry Alvarez and Dick Bennett.

Obama too is a star, and certainly flashy enough to interest and motivate Madison's liberal (and radical) base next Tuesday.

Previous post: Live Blog: Maryland Primary
Next post: Poll: Obama Up 4 In Wisconsin

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting