Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Latest Pennyslvania Poll Finds Massive Gender Gap Among Democrats

Bookmark and Share

A new poll released Sunday by American Research Group (ARG) continues to show Hillary Clinton leading Barack Obama by double digits, some six weeks before Pennsylvania's crucial Democratic primary. Clinton's lead, 52 to 41 percent, is less noteworthy than the extent of the gender gap reflected by this poll of 600 likely primary voters conducted March 7-8.

Obama leads Clinton by an impressive 21 points among men, 59 to 38 percent. Clinton, however, leads the Illinois Senator by a whopping 36 points among women, 63 to 29 percent. Even if the gender gaps were equal, Clinton would still hold the advantage, as women comprise approximately 55 percent of Democratic primary voters in the Keystone State.

This massive gender gap has not been reflected in all Pennsylvania surveys, however. In a Rasmussen survey of 690 likley primary voters conducted on March 5th, where Clinton's lead was measured at 52 to 37 percent, the New York Senator led Obama by just 17 points among women (19 points less than in the ARG poll) and also led Obama among male voters by 11 points (a 32 point difference from the ARG poll).

Even accounting for the margin of error with each survey, it is difficult to reconcile the vast differences with these internal gender demographics. All the more reason to interpret single polls with caution—especially six weeks out from primary day.

Previous post: Obama Wins Wyoming Caucuses
Next post: Obama Wins Mississippi Primary

2 Comments


  • OK, Mr. Obama. You're pretty speech was full of rhetoric. I would be most impressed if you got Mr. Wirght to recant, apologize, and denounce his inflammatory remarks ("Notice, I didn't have to use the word race"). If you can get Mr. Wright to announce to the world to what he said was wrong, then I would have profound respect for you. Stop challenging America to change when you too are an agent of change.

  • OK, Mr. Obama. You're pretty speech was full of rhetoric. I would be most impressed if you got Mr. Wirght to recant, apologize, and denounce his inflammatory remarks ("Notice, I didn't have to use the word race"). If you can get Mr. Wright to announce to the world to what he said was wrong, then I would have profound respect for you. Stop challenging America to change when you too are an agent of change.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting