Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Beware the Race Card (It Should Already Have Been Played)

Bookmark and Share

As Barack Obama continues to labor under the cloud of controversy stirred up by his longtime friend, pastor, and ostensibly mentor Jeremiah Wright, the consequence of Wright's recent high profile speaking engagements will no doubt result in an abandonment of some voters, many of whom will be white, from Obama's camp to either John McCain's or Hillary Clinton's.

The pace and scope of this desertion is not yet clear, and even one on a fairly large scale would almost certainly not be enough for Clinton to emerge with the most pledged delegates after the last primaries in early June.

In a brand new poll conducted by SurveyUSA from April 26-29 of likely voters in North Carolina, Obama finds his once double-digit lead over Clinton reduced to 5 points—49 to 44 percent. The headline from that poll was stated thusly:

"White voters are key. Since January, Clinton had led among Carolina whites by 14, 19, 17, 22 and 23 points. But today, suddenly: 31."

If Clinton manages to perform above expectations and make North Carolina a nail-biter, expect the left-leaning media and pundits to level the race charge against white America, perhaps tempered with the qualifier that whites "do not understand black (churches)" or that there was a "racial component" to the vote.

And perhaps that's true.

But let's look at the numbers: Obama has regularly been receiving 40 (Ohio) to 45 (Texas) percent of the white vote in states that he has lost. Clinton, meanwhile, has struggled to receive 15 percent of the black vote in states that she has won. The question for the pundits: where was the outcry when blacks abandoned Clinton in favor of Obama? Remember, Clinton received 88 percent of the black vote in her 2006 re-election victory for Senator of New York.

In short, even on his worst day in the midst of this controversy, Obama is going to receive two to three times the proportion of Democratic white voters as Clinton will receive from blacks. So if and when Obama supporters play the race card during the coming weeks, know that this card could just have easily been played by the Clinton campaign—and with more justification—many months ago.

Previous post: Immigration Concerns Linger in Upper Midwest Even As Issue Fades from Presidential Race
Next post: Clinton Takes 1st Lead in North Carolina Since Edwards Departure

1 Comment


  • I keep hearing from people that we as americans should show the world that we have racial equality by electing Obama just cause hes black. Not because he would be a great president, or that he can run the country, but because hes black he should be president....

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Which States Have the Longest and Shortest Election Day Voting Hours?

    Residents in some North Dakota towns have less than half as many hours to cast their ballots as those in New York State.

    Political Crumbs

    No 100-Year Curse for Roberts

    Defeating his Tea Party primary challenger Milton Wolf with just 48.1 percent of the vote, Pat Roberts narrowly escaped becoming the first elected U.S. Senator from Kansas to lose a renomination bid in 100 years. The last - and so far only - elected U.S. Senator to lose a Kansas primary was one-term Republican Joseph Bristow in 1914. Bristow was defeated by former U.S. Senator Charles Curtis who went on to win three terms before becoming Herbert Hoover's running mate in 1928. Only one other U.S. Senator from the Sunflower State has lost a primary since the passage of the 17th Amendment: Sheila Frahm in 1996. Frahm was appointed to fill Bob Dole's seat earlier that year and finished 13.2 points behind Sam Brownback in the three-candidate primary field. Overall, incumbent senators from Kansas have won 29 times against two defeats in the direct vote era. (Curtis also lost a primary in 1912 to Walter Stubbs, one year before the nation moved to direct elections).


    The Second Time Around

    Former Republican Congressman Bob Beauprez became the seventh major party or second place gubernatorial candidate in Colorado to get a second chance at the office when he narrowly won his party's nomination last month. Two of the previous six candidates were successful. Democrat Alva Adams lost his first gubernatorial bid to Benjamin Eaton in 1884, but was victorious two years later against William Meyer. Democrat Charles Johnson placed third in 1894 behind Republican Albert McIntyre and Populist incumbent Governor David Waite but returned as the Fusion (Democrat/Populist) nominee in 1898 and defeated GOPer Henry Wolcott. Gubernatorial candidates who received a second chance but lost both general elections include Democrat Thomas Patterson (1888, 1914), Progressive Edward Costigan (1912, 1914), Republican Donald Brotzman (1954, 1956), and Republican David Strickland (1978, 1986).


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting