Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Immigration Concerns Linger in Upper Midwest Even As Issue Fades from Presidential Race

Bookmark and Share

During the heat of the Republican nomination battle, GOP candidates were criticized by many pundits and pro-immigration advocates for inflaming the public fear of illegal immigration as well as for artificially pushing the policy issue on the front burner of their campaigns. To some extent, illegal immigration became a prominent issue for the GOP—even spilling over into the Democratic debates—because of the presence of firebrand Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo in the GOP race.

Immigration consistently polled as a top-tier issue during that span, frequently polling as the second or third most important issue behind the War in Iraq and the economy.

But with John McCain's nomination all but sealed up since mid-February, the immigration issue appears to have faded from the national scene. The question remains: do the folks still care about immigration, or was it a Republican politician-driven issue?

In the Upper Midwest, illegal immigration continues to resonate as a strong concern, and new polling numbers by SurveyUSA still show the issue polling in third place behind the economy and the war in Iraq in both Wisconsin and Iowa.

In polling conducted April 11-13 of 600 adults, 11 percent of Iowans believe immigration is the most important issue facing the next president, ahead of perennial media favorites like health care (9 percent), terrorism (9 percent), the environment (5 percent), education (4 percent), and Social Security (3 percent). The economy (36 percent) and Iraq (19 percent) ranked as the most important issues.

In Wisconsin, the economy (39 percent) and Iraq (14 percent) also ranked at the top, with immigration (10 percent) tied with health care for third place. Terrorism (8 percent), the environment (5 percent), education (5 percent), and Social Security (4 percent) trailed behind.

Whether or not immigration policy will have a place at the table in the general election debates is unclear—McCain has stated he has "heard the people" and is now in favor of sealing the border first (and, essentially, abandoning his amnesty plan that angered the Republican base and independents in 2006). That position is much more hardline than anything that has been proposed by Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, so a debate on the topic would prove interesting, presuming McCain does not backtrack from the position he carved out during the nomination phase, now that his ticket is stamped for the GOP convention.

Previous post: Harkin (D-IA) Coasting in 2008 Senate Re-election Bid
Next post: Beware the Race Card (It Should Already Have Been Played)

1 Comment


  • I see you had one post about immigration in the entire 2008. And one so far in 2009. What happened? A shift in policy? When Dobbs' and Limbaughs are dominating the nation's air waves, we need more platforms to present a balanced view of this complex issue. Keep up the good work.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting