Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Suffolk Poll: Clinton Within 4 Points in Oregon

Bookmark and Share

A Suffolk University poll of 600 likely voters in Oregon this weekend (May 17-18) now measures the race between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton to be within 4 points. This echoes the findings of American Research Group polls last week that measured Obama's advantage at 5 points.

The West Virginia primary rout by Clinton last Tuesday appears to have created doubt in the minds of some Oregonian Democrats as to whether they now want Obama to be their nominee (Obama was leading in the polls by 10 to 20 points in Oregon prior to the West Virginia primary).

In the new Suffolk poll, Obama receives the support of 45 percent of likely voters, with Clinton at 41 percent. Eight percent were undecided and 6 percent refused to answer.

The Obama campaign has stated it will not 'declare victory' Tuesday night if it receives the number of delegates it believes will win them the nomination. This might be a smart tactic, considering such a victory speech would come on a night with Clinton picking up a few hundred thousands votes, Clinton winning Kentucky by 25+ points, and Obama potentially not knowing whether or not he won Oregon until late into the night on the East coast and in the Central time zone.

A Suffolk poll of 600 likely voters in Kentucky, also conducted May 17-18, measured Clinton's lead at 51 to 25 percent, with John Edwards (whose name will be on the ballot) at 6 percent, and 11 percent undecided. An equal number of Democrats in Kentucky have a favorable view of the junior Senator from Illinois as those that have an unfavorable view (43 percent). Clinton is viewed favorably by 79 percent of its Democratic voters.

In Oregon, both candidates are viewed quite favorably: Obama at 73 percent and Clinton at 69 percent.

Previous post: Polls in KY, OR: Someone Forgot to Tell the Voters 'It's Over'
Next post: KY, OR Primary: Live Blog Tonight

2 Comments


  • I think you'd better comment on this article and poll given the final result.

  • Smart Politics' May 21st entry ("Kentucky, Oregon Wrap Up: Smart Politics Projections Hit the Target") sums up my analysis of the Oregon and Kentucky primaries. While the ARG numbers obviously did not reflect the larger margin of Obama's primary victory, Smart Politics' projections (made the week before, on May 14th) were dead-on accurate. Since Oregonians were able to cast their votes for a few weeks before primary day, it is possible the ARG poll did account for those who had already voted (those who would have voted before Clinton's potential West Virginia 'bounce').

    Smart Politics has been and will continue to be accountable for its own election projections; easy enough to do, as no other political blog in the Gopher State (or region) has as accurate a track record as this blog.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting