Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Suffolk Poll: Clinton Within 4 Points in Oregon

Bookmark and Share

A Suffolk University poll of 600 likely voters in Oregon this weekend (May 17-18) now measures the race between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton to be within 4 points. This echoes the findings of American Research Group polls last week that measured Obama's advantage at 5 points.

The West Virginia primary rout by Clinton last Tuesday appears to have created doubt in the minds of some Oregonian Democrats as to whether they now want Obama to be their nominee (Obama was leading in the polls by 10 to 20 points in Oregon prior to the West Virginia primary).

In the new Suffolk poll, Obama receives the support of 45 percent of likely voters, with Clinton at 41 percent. Eight percent were undecided and 6 percent refused to answer.

The Obama campaign has stated it will not 'declare victory' Tuesday night if it receives the number of delegates it believes will win them the nomination. This might be a smart tactic, considering such a victory speech would come on a night with Clinton picking up a few hundred thousands votes, Clinton winning Kentucky by 25+ points, and Obama potentially not knowing whether or not he won Oregon until late into the night on the East coast and in the Central time zone.

A Suffolk poll of 600 likely voters in Kentucky, also conducted May 17-18, measured Clinton's lead at 51 to 25 percent, with John Edwards (whose name will be on the ballot) at 6 percent, and 11 percent undecided. An equal number of Democrats in Kentucky have a favorable view of the junior Senator from Illinois as those that have an unfavorable view (43 percent). Clinton is viewed favorably by 79 percent of its Democratic voters.

In Oregon, both candidates are viewed quite favorably: Obama at 73 percent and Clinton at 69 percent.

Previous post: Polls in KY, OR: Someone Forgot to Tell the Voters 'It's Over'
Next post: KY, OR Primary: Live Blog Tonight

2 Comments


  • I think you'd better comment on this article and poll given the final result.

  • Smart Politics' May 21st entry ("Kentucky, Oregon Wrap Up: Smart Politics Projections Hit the Target") sums up my analysis of the Oregon and Kentucky primaries. While the ARG numbers obviously did not reflect the larger margin of Obama's primary victory, Smart Politics' projections (made the week before, on May 14th) were dead-on accurate. Since Oregonians were able to cast their votes for a few weeks before primary day, it is possible the ARG poll did account for those who had already voted (those who would have voted before Clinton's potential West Virginia 'bounce').

    Smart Politics has been and will continue to be accountable for its own election projections; easy enough to do, as no other political blog in the Gopher State (or region) has as accurate a track record as this blog.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Which States Own the Best Track Record in Backing Eventual GOP Presidential Nominees?

    Nine states (each with primaries) have an unblemished record in voting for the eventual Republican nominee since 1976 - and not all host contests on the back end of the calendar.

    Political Crumbs

    Evolving?

    When Scott Walker "punted" back in February after being asked if he was comfortable with the idea of evolution he added, "That's a question a politician shouldn't be involved in one way or the other." However, it may very well be a question that is asked at one of the upcoming GOP debates this year. In South Carolina during the first GOP debate in 2012, FOX News' Juan Williams asked Tim Pawlenty, "Do you equate the teaching of creationism with the teaching of evolution as the basis for what should be taught for our nation's schools?" Pawlenty replied, "There should be room in the curriculum for study of intelligent design" but that it was up to the local school districts if it should be in a science class or comparative theory class. At the fourth Republican debate held in California, Jon Huntsman addressed the GOP becoming "anti-science" thusly: "Listen, when you make comments that fly in the face of what 98 out of 100 climate scientists have said, when you call into question the science of evolution, all I'm saying is that, in order for the Republican Party to win, we can't run from science. We can't run from mainstream conservative philosophy."


    73 Months and Counting

    January's preliminary Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show Minnesota's unemployment rate of 3.7 percent was once again lower than Wisconsin's 5.0 percent. That marks the 73rd consecutive month in which Minnesota has boasted a lower jobless rate than its neighbor to the east dating back to January 2009 including each of the last 67 months by at least one point. The Gopher State has now edged Wisconsin in the employment border battle for 204 of the last 216 months dating back to February 1997. Wisconsin only managed a lower unemployment rate than Minnesota for the 12 months of 2008 during this 18-year span.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting