Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Quinnipiac: Obama Breaks Out to Double Digit Leads in MN, WI

Bookmark and Share

Polls released this morning by Quinnipiac University of more than 1,500 likely voters in both Minnesota and Wisconsin show Barack Obama staked to his largest lead to date over John McCain in each battleground state.

In Minnesota, the poll (which, due to its large sample size has a margin of error of just 2.5 percent), found Obama garnering the support of 54 percent of likely voters, with 37 percent for McCain, and 8 percent undecided. Obama’s previous largest advantage was 15 points as measured by Rasmussen in mid-May and mid-February. The Quinnipiac poll comes on the heels of a poll released a little more than a week ago by SurveyUSA, which found Obama with just a 1-point margin over McCain among likely voters.

As demonstrated in recent surveys by Rasmussen, the economy is currently the most important issue determining vote choice this year in the Gopher State. Of the five options provided to interviewees, 51 percent of Minnesotans cited the economy, with 21 percent citing the war in Iraq, 11 percent for health care, 5 percent for illegal immigration, and 5 percent for terrorism. Obama had a 2.6 to 1 advantage over McCain for those citing the war in Iraq as the most important issue and a 1.6 to 1 advantage over McCain for those citing the economy. McCain had a 7 to 1 advantage over Obama for those citing terrorism (fueling the chatter among some pundits, and, recently, a top McCain campaign official, that a terrorist attack on the United States would be a big advantage for McCain in November).

In Wisconsin, Quinnipiac measured Obama’s lead at 52 to 39 percent – tied for his largest advantage over McCain in matchup polls released this campaign season (along with an early June University of Wisconsin poll). Eight percent were undecided. Wisconsin has voted for Democratic nominees in the past 5 presidential elections, although with an average victory margin of just 3.8 points.

Wisconsinites also cited the economy as the most important issue determining their presidential vote choice (47 percent), followed by the war in Iraq (20 percent), health care (14 percent), terrorism (8 percent), and illegal immigration (4 percent). Obama’s advantage over McCain for “Iraq voters? was 3 to 1, and 1.5 to 1 for “economy voters.? McCain bests Obama by a 12.2 to 1 margin for those citing terrorism as the most important issue.

Previous post:
Next post: Bush Approval Rating Hits All-Time Low in Minnesota

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting