Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Why Is Obama Talking About Religion?

Bookmark and Share

Barack Obama's recent comments on religion's problematic role when mixed with government—along with his citation of certain Biblical passages as evidence of this point—have now once again raised the specter of his own religious beliefs. Obama's comments not only renewed his political feud with Dr. James Dobson, founder of Focus of the Family (who is a tepid McCain supporter at best), but it also allows his detractors to further revisit Obama's own faith and ties to controversial religious figures, such as Pastor Jeremiah Wright.

Obama should know by now that it is not smart politics to use religion to further a political argument, nor is it wise to discuss the role religion should have in the United States, where upwards of 90 percent of the citizenry are believers. While Obama's remarks were not anti-religious per se, there is little wiggle room for error among many religious constituencies.

This is a problem for Obama because the Illinois Senator had been peeling away a decent percentage of strongly religious voters, especially in battleground states.

According to mid-June polling of likely voters by SurveyUSA, among those who regularly attended church service, Obama received the support of 41 percent of voters in Wisconsin and New Mexico, 39 percent in Iowa, 37 percent in Minnesota, 32 percent in Washington, and 31 percent in Oregon.

Religion is certainly not John McCain's strong suit—the Arizona Senator has his own checkered past when it comes to courting the religious right vote—and he will likely steer clear of the Obama-Dobson debate. But Obama is undoubtedly the most vulnerable on this issue, and further 'frank discussions' by Obama on religion and politics is likely only going to cause more damage to his campaign.

Previous post: Déjà Vu: McCain-Obama Margin Same as Bush-Kerrry 4 Years Ago
Next post:

2 Comments


  • I'm not so sure about this. You mentioned that Obama "had been peeling away a decent percentage of strongly religious voters," so he must be doing something right. This isn't the first time he's made arguments like this. There's a reason that Obama has made inroads, which is his willingness to speak freely about his faith. Too much caution and poll-watching turns you into Hillary Clinton.

  • How, exactly, is it that you decide that Obama is "undoubtedly the most vulnerable on the issue"? He is a longtime, devoted member of a mainstream Christian denomination. People of faith are leaving the Republican Party in numbers not seen in years, and McCain inspires tepid support, if that, from the evangelicals who brought George W. Bush to victory in 2000 and 2004. McCain is a known philanderer and is a divorcee, while Obama has no such red flags in his past.

    Psst, cover up - your biases are showing!

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Which States Own the Best Track Record in Backing Eventual GOP Presidential Nominees?

    Nine states (each with primaries) have an unblemished record in voting for the eventual Republican nominee since 1976 - and not all host contests on the back end of the calendar.

    Political Crumbs

    Evolving?

    When Scott Walker "punted" back in February after being asked if he was comfortable with the idea of evolution he added, "That's a question a politician shouldn't be involved in one way or the other." However, it may very well be a question that is asked at one of the upcoming GOP debates this year. In South Carolina during the first GOP debate in 2012, FOX News' Juan Williams asked Tim Pawlenty, "Do you equate the teaching of creationism with the teaching of evolution as the basis for what should be taught for our nation's schools?" Pawlenty replied, "There should be room in the curriculum for study of intelligent design" but that it was up to the local school districts if it should be in a science class or comparative theory class. At the fourth Republican debate held in California, Jon Huntsman addressed the GOP becoming "anti-science" thusly: "Listen, when you make comments that fly in the face of what 98 out of 100 climate scientists have said, when you call into question the science of evolution, all I'm saying is that, in order for the Republican Party to win, we can't run from science. We can't run from mainstream conservative philosophy."


    73 Months and Counting

    January's preliminary Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show Minnesota's unemployment rate of 3.7 percent was once again lower than Wisconsin's 5.0 percent. That marks the 73rd consecutive month in which Minnesota has boasted a lower jobless rate than its neighbor to the east dating back to January 2009 including each of the last 67 months by at least one point. The Gopher State has now edged Wisconsin in the employment border battle for 204 of the last 216 months dating back to February 1997. Wisconsin only managed a lower unemployment rate than Minnesota for the 12 months of 2008 during this 18-year span.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting