Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Why Is Obama Talking About Religion?

Bookmark and Share

Barack Obama's recent comments on religion's problematic role when mixed with government—along with his citation of certain Biblical passages as evidence of this point—have now once again raised the specter of his own religious beliefs. Obama's comments not only renewed his political feud with Dr. James Dobson, founder of Focus of the Family (who is a tepid McCain supporter at best), but it also allows his detractors to further revisit Obama's own faith and ties to controversial religious figures, such as Pastor Jeremiah Wright.

Obama should know by now that it is not smart politics to use religion to further a political argument, nor is it wise to discuss the role religion should have in the United States, where upwards of 90 percent of the citizenry are believers. While Obama's remarks were not anti-religious per se, there is little wiggle room for error among many religious constituencies.

This is a problem for Obama because the Illinois Senator had been peeling away a decent percentage of strongly religious voters, especially in battleground states.

According to mid-June polling of likely voters by SurveyUSA, among those who regularly attended church service, Obama received the support of 41 percent of voters in Wisconsin and New Mexico, 39 percent in Iowa, 37 percent in Minnesota, 32 percent in Washington, and 31 percent in Oregon.

Religion is certainly not John McCain's strong suit—the Arizona Senator has his own checkered past when it comes to courting the religious right vote—and he will likely steer clear of the Obama-Dobson debate. But Obama is undoubtedly the most vulnerable on this issue, and further 'frank discussions' by Obama on religion and politics is likely only going to cause more damage to his campaign.

Previous post: Déjà Vu: McCain-Obama Margin Same as Bush-Kerrry 4 Years Ago
Next post:

2 Comments


  • I'm not so sure about this. You mentioned that Obama "had been peeling away a decent percentage of strongly religious voters," so he must be doing something right. This isn't the first time he's made arguments like this. There's a reason that Obama has made inroads, which is his willingness to speak freely about his faith. Too much caution and poll-watching turns you into Hillary Clinton.

  • How, exactly, is it that you decide that Obama is "undoubtedly the most vulnerable on the issue"? He is a longtime, devoted member of a mainstream Christian denomination. People of faith are leaving the Republican Party in numbers not seen in years, and McCain inspires tepid support, if that, from the evangelicals who brought George W. Bush to victory in 2000 and 2004. McCain is a known philanderer and is a divorcee, while Obama has no such red flags in his past.

    Psst, cover up - your biases are showing!

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Which States Have the Longest and Shortest Election Day Voting Hours?

    Residents in some North Dakota towns have less than half as many hours to cast their ballots as those in New York State.

    Political Crumbs

    Does My Key Still Work?

    Much has been made about Charlie Crist's political transformation from Republican to independent to Democrat en route to winning the Florida GOP and Democratic gubernatorial nominations over a span of eight years. Party-switching aside, Crist is also vying to become just the second Florida governor to serve two interrupted terms. Democrat William Bloxham was the first - serving four year terms from 1881 to 1885 and then 1897 to 1901. Florida did not permit governors serving consecutive terms for most of its 123 years prior to changes made in its 1968 constitution. Since then four have done so: Democrats Reubin Askew, Bob Graham, and Lawton Chiles and Republican Jeb Bush.


    No 100-Year Curse for Roberts

    Defeating his Tea Party primary challenger Milton Wolf with just 48.1 percent of the vote, Pat Roberts narrowly escaped becoming the first elected U.S. Senator from Kansas to lose a renomination bid in 100 years. The last - and so far only - elected U.S. Senator to lose a Kansas primary was one-term Republican Joseph Bristow in 1914. Bristow was defeated by former U.S. Senator Charles Curtis who went on to win three terms before becoming Herbert Hoover's running mate in 1928. Only one other U.S. Senator from the Sunflower State has lost a primary since the passage of the 17th Amendment: Sheila Frahm in 1996. Frahm was appointed to fill Bob Dole's seat earlier that year and finished 13.2 points behind Sam Brownback in the three-candidate primary field. Overall, incumbent senators from Kansas have won 29 times against two defeats in the direct vote era. (Curtis also lost a primary in 1912 to Walter Stubbs, one year before the nation moved to direct elections).


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting