Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Would Pawlenty Deliver Minnesota to McCain As VP Nominee?

Bookmark and Share

Minnesota Republican Governor Tim Pawlenty has been one of just a handful of names floated by the media and Republican strategists over the past year as a potential Vice Presidential running mate to John McCain. The national attention on Pawlenty is significant and unusual. Pawlenty's credentials for being added to McCain's ticket are many, but primarily center on: (1) His outspoken support for McCain through thick and thin during the 2008 campaign, (2) His 2006 win in a purple state when many Republicans lost (buoyed by his broad appeal to conservatives, moderates and some Democrats); (3) He adds a youthful face to the 2008 GOP ticket; and (4) He could help Republicans steal a state that Democrats depend on in November.

A big question is whether a McCain/Pawlenty ticket would carry the Gopher State. Recent history is well known: Pawlenty has been unable to win majorities in his 2002 and 2006 gubernatorial election bids (he received 44 percent and 47 percent, respectively). Going back further in history, there is a notable pattern of Vice Presidential nominee's struggling to win their home states.

In 25 presidential elections during the past 100 years since 1908, the presidential tickets have not carried the running mate's home state in 19 instances (38 percent). The most recent example is Democrat John Edwards who failed to carry North Carolina for John Kerry in 2004.

Of the 31 instances in which the running mate won their home state, more than two-thirds were in states that the VP's party had already won during the previous presidential election. For example, VP nominee Dick Cheney and George W. Bush won Wyoming in 2000, but Republicans had already carried the Cowboy State in every presidential election year since Richard Nixon's victory in 1968.

A McCain/Pawlenty ticket would therefore be bucking history -- only 10 of 50 races (20 percent) since 1908 saw a ticket win the VP's state after the party had lost the state in the previous election. This has happened to the benefit of 5 Republican and 5 Democratic tickets. Some notable examples:

  • In 1992, the Clinton-Gore ticket won Gore's home state of Tennessee by 5 points over George H. W. Bush (with the help of Ross Perot); Bush had won the Volunteer state by 16 points in 1988.
  • In 1980, the Reagan-Bush ticket won Bush's home state of Texas by 14 points over Jimmy Carter; Carter had won the Lone Star State by 3 points in 1976.
  • In 1976, the Carter-Mondale ticket won Mondale's home state of Minnesota by 13 points over Gerald Ford; Richard Nixon had won the Gopher State by 6 points in 1972.
  • In 1960, the JFK-LBJ ticket won Johnson's home state of Texas by 2 points over Nixon; the Eisenhower-Nixon ticket had won Texas by 11 points in 1956.

However, selecting a Vice-Presidential nominee has also coincided with the loss of a VP's home state in 6 elections (12 percent) that their party had won in the previous election (3 each for Republicans and Democrats). Some notable examples:

  • Democratic VP nominee R. Sargent Shriver lost his home state of Maryland with George McGovern by 24 points in 1972; 4 years earlier Hubert Humphrey won the state by 2 points.
  • Republican Henry Lodge lost his home state of Massachusetts with Richard Nixon by 21 points in 1960; in 1956 Eisenhower and Nixon had won the state by 19 points—a 40-point turnaround.

To Pawlenty's advantage, he is coming off two straight statewide election gubernatorial victories and has enjoyed approval and favorability ratings in the mid- to low 50s throughout most of his more than 5 years in office.

Previous post: Clinton Retains Advantage Over McCain, Obama in Key Battleground States
Next post: South Dakota and Montana Preview; ARG Finds Clinton Up 26 Points in SD

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Which States Own the Best Track Record in Backing Eventual GOP Presidential Nominees?

Nine states (each with primaries) have an unblemished record in voting for the eventual Republican nominee since 1976 - and not all host contests on the back end of the calendar.

Political Crumbs

Evolving?

When Scott Walker "punted" back in February after being asked if he was comfortable with the idea of evolution he added, "That's a question a politician shouldn't be involved in one way or the other." However, it may very well be a question that is asked at one of the upcoming GOP debates this year. In South Carolina during the first GOP debate in 2012, FOX News' Juan Williams asked Tim Pawlenty, "Do you equate the teaching of creationism with the teaching of evolution as the basis for what should be taught for our nation's schools?" Pawlenty replied, "There should be room in the curriculum for study of intelligent design" but that it was up to the local school districts if it should be in a science class or comparative theory class. At the fourth Republican debate held in California, Jon Huntsman addressed the GOP becoming "anti-science" thusly: "Listen, when you make comments that fly in the face of what 98 out of 100 climate scientists have said, when you call into question the science of evolution, all I'm saying is that, in order for the Republican Party to win, we can't run from science. We can't run from mainstream conservative philosophy."


73 Months and Counting

January's preliminary Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show Minnesota's unemployment rate of 3.7 percent was once again lower than Wisconsin's 5.0 percent. That marks the 73rd consecutive month in which Minnesota has boasted a lower jobless rate than its neighbor to the east dating back to January 2009 including each of the last 67 months by at least one point. The Gopher State has now edged Wisconsin in the employment border battle for 204 of the last 216 months dating back to February 1997. Wisconsin only managed a lower unemployment rate than Minnesota for the 12 months of 2008 during this 18-year span.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting