Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Pawlenty VP Pick Would Be Rare: Slot Historically Reserved for D.C. Players

Bookmark and Share

Should John McCain pick Tim Pawlenty to be his Vice-Presidential running mate in the coming days, the selection would be a bit of a rarity, given recent political history.

During the past 14 presidential elections dating back to 1952, just 2 major party VP nominees had not served in the U.S. Congress: Spiro Agnew in 1968 (and 1972) and Sargent Shriver in 1972. (Vice President Nelson Rockefeller had also not served in Congress, but he was confirmed, not elected, during President Ford’s presidential tenure).

Most victorious tickets were comprised of VP nominees who had served as U.S. Senator: Al Gore, Dan Quayle, Walter Mondale, Hubert Humphrey, Lyndon B. Johnson, and Richard Nixon. Dick Cheney, Gerald Ford, and George H.W. Bush had both served in the U.S. House (Bush had also held the prominent positions in D.C. of CIA Director and United Nations Ambassador and Cheney was Secretary of Defense under Bush 41). Several of these VP nominees had also held notable leadership posts while in Congress, developing a national political base (Cheney was House Minority Whip, Ford was House Minority Leader for eight years, Humphrey was Senate Majority Whip, and Johnson had been both Senate Majority and Minority Leader).

Those nominees since 1952 who never became vice-president have also consistently been members of Congress. Most were Senators (John Edwards, Joe Lieberman, Lloyd Bentsen, Bob Dole, Edmund Muskie, Henry Cabot Lodge, Jr., Estes Kefauver, and John Sparkman) while a few served only in the House (Jack Kemp, Geraldine Ferraro, and William E. Miller; Kemp had also served as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and Miller had been Chairman of the RNC).

Only two VP nominees since 1952 had served as Governor: Edmund Muskie and Spiro Agnew. Sargent Shriver had not been elected to any prominent office, though he had served in D.C. as Ambassador to France and Director of the Peace Corps.

In short, if selected, Governor Pawlenty would certainly stand out in terms of his lack of experience in D.C. and his overall lack of a national political base. However, Pawlenty would also stand out for his years of executive experience – experience few VP nominees have enjoyed. A Pawlenty pick would harken back to pre-1952 presidential elections when it was much more common to select VP nominees outside of D.C. (Henry A. Wallace, Charles G. Dawes, Calvin Coolidge, Thomas R. Marshall, Earl Warren, John W. Bricker, Frank Knox, and Charles W. Bryan to name a few).

Previous post: Pawlenty Disapproval Numbers Increasing Amid VP Talk
Next post: Obama Lead Narrows in Iowa While Harkin’s Lead Expands

1 Comment


  • That might be fitting, seeing that a Senator winning the presidency has been similarly rare over the same time period.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting