Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Upper Midwesterns Back McCain on Foreign Policy; Domestic Policy Mixed

Bookmark and Share

A series of SurveyUSA polls across the Upper Midwest finds registered voters more confident John McCain can better handle foreign policy issues and immigration, while Barack Obama has the edge on health care. In a surprising turn, Obama ends up with a draw against McCain on economic issues.

The polls, conducted in Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin from August 15-17, bolster the conventional wisdom that McCain’s forte is foreign policy. In all three states, registered voters believe the Arizona Senator would do a better job handling the war in Iraq and fighting terrorism.

Despite opposition to the war in Iraq across the Upper Midwest in recent years, McCain’s support for the war – and his steadfast support for the troop surge in 2007 – does not seem to have damaged the GOP nominee. McCain is viewed as better equipped to handle the war in Iowa (49 to 42 percent), Minnesota (46 to 43 percent), and Wisconsin (50 to 41 percent). This is not a good sign for Obama, whose centerpiece foreign policy argument is that he has better judgment than McCain (Obama was opposed to the war back in 2003).

McCain – and Republican candidates generally – have held an advantage over Democrats when it comes to handling the war on terrorism, and the SurveyUSA poll supports that trend. McCain holds a double-digit advantage over Obama in all three states on the terrorism issue: 53 to 36 percent in Iowa, 50 to 36 percent in Minnesota, and 53 to 35 percent in Wisconsin.

On the domestic front, although McCain as recent as early 2007 shared similar views on immigration policy to Obama, the Arizona Senator now holds a clear edge on the issue (McCain has since adopted a more hard-line policy emphasizing border enforcement first, consonant with his Party and Americans overall). McCain holds a double-digit advantage on immigration in Wisconsin (49 to 36 percent), and a somewhat smaller lead on the issue in Iowa (45 to 38 percent) and Minnesota (44 to 37 percent).

To no surprise, Barack Obama holds a very large advantage on the issue of handling health care. Health care was a centerpiece to Obama’s primary campaign victory, and has been an issue Democrats have long held the upper hand against the GOP. McCain has also been taken to task by pundits for his lack of a vision on domestic policy issues. Obama holds a double-digit lead over McCain on health care in Iowa (51 to 33 percent), Minnesota (52 to 37 percent) and Wisconsin (48 to 38 percent).

But when it comes to economic issues, Obama has not been able to leverage the unease Upper Midwesterns are feeling with high gas prices and difficulties with the home mortgage sector under the current Republican administration. Obama holds only a slight advantage over McCain on the economy in Iowa (47 to 43 percent) and Minnesota (46 to 44 percent), with McCain slightly on top in Wisconsin (45 to 43 percent). Pundits have criticized Obama for not mapping out enough specifics in his economic plan.

The SurveyUSA polls confirm that the Upper Midwest is the battleground for the 2008 presidential campaign.

Previous post: Obama-Biden: Familiar Bedfellows...Though You'd Never Know It
Next post: Trust in Government Drops By Nearly Half In Minnesota Since 2004

5 Comments


  • The competition between Obama and McCain is really colossal. The question for this is not, who’s going to be the next president? Instead, who’s the best leader between the two? Election is really a competition, but I hope win or lose, they would still continue on helping for economic development. I hope so.

    But then, let see what will be the outcome of this year’s presidential election. Our future will depends on our decisions.

    Post Courtesy of Personal Money Store Professional

  • It is interesting after the election to see how much support McCain lost in these states due to the massive issues surrounding the economy. I would speculate that had the economy not become the major issue in the last six weeks of the campaign, that he would have carried these states and perhaps the White House.

  • It is interesting after the election to see how much support McCain lost in these states due to the massive issues surrounding the economy. I would speculate that had the economy not become the major issue in the last six weeks of the campaign, that he would have carried these states and perhaps the White House.

  • McCain lost for one simple reason. Obama was a far better person for the Presidency of the United States who was also a far better public speaker. McCain had one upside to his campaign, which was foreign policy and he beat it too death. McCain failed to understand that the nation no longer wanted any part of this massive mistake of a war in Iraq.

  • The competition between Obama and McCain is really colossal. The question for this is not, who’s going to be the next president? Instead, who’s the best leader between the two?test

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting