Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Why Dean Barkley Is Hurting Al Franken's U.S. Senate Chances

Bookmark and Share

A new U.S. Senate poll released today by the Humphrey Institute and Minnesota Public Radio finds Norm Coleman and Al Franken virtually deadlocked in the Gopher State’s U.S. Senate race.

While Franken’s statistically insignificant 41 to 40 percent lead in the poll comes as a bit of a surprise – Franken had only been measured with a lead in 1 of the previous 17 public polls dating back to February 2008 – what should not come as a surprise to either campaign is the 8 percent support currently amassed by former Senator and likely Independence Party primary winner Dean Barkley.

The Coleman-Franken battle has been one of the most expensive and brutal U.S. Senate races in recent years nationwide. In a state where ‘Minnesota nice’ still has some meaning, it is only natural that some voters who are disgusted with the Coleman and Franken attacks, and the hate-filled diatribes ideologues have littered across the blogs, will gravitate to a third party – especially in a state that is not shy about supporting third parties.

The Independence Party and Barkley backers will insist they are not ‘stealing’ votes from anyone, especially Franken. In a democracy, this is, of course, technically true – no vote is ‘owned’ by any candidate or political party. IP supporters will thus likely tout Barkley’s demeanor and credentials (as well as the Gopher State’s independent streak) for any support he receives.

This may have been true once upon a time, when Independent Party candidates were more closely aligned with the GOP or had a reputation for being ‘true independents.’ In fact, a recent study by Smart Politics of state House races found the DFL to be the beneficiary of IP candidates getting on the ballot.

But recent statewide campaigns by 2006 Gubernatorial IP nominee Peter Hutchinson and Barkley in 2008 reveal the Independence Party’s policy positions on many issues to be near carbon-copies of the DFL. As a result, in the 2008 U.S. Senate race, the HHH/MPR study finds Barkley is:

…Competing with Franken for the angry voter who disapproves of Bush and sees the country as off on the wrong track. Franken is only winning 51% of Minnesotans who are concerned that the country is off-track and Barkley is a major reason that the Democrat is not getting even more disaffected Minnesotans -- he is drawing 9% of these voters. A similar story is evident with regard to Minnesotans who disapprove of Coleman and Bush: Barkley is diverting 9% of these critics -- voters that might otherwise support Franken.?

A look at Barkley’s issue positions reveals, in fact, a significant overlap with modern Democratic Party values:

· On gay rights: “It’s long past time to acknowledge that the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution applies to all Americans, regardless of their sexual preference.?

· On the War on Drugs: “America’s vaunted “war on drugs? has been a costly and miserable failure. … All we have succeeded in doing is to create a huge criminal enterprise that thrives on supplying outlawed drugs, and a huge criminal population for essentially nonviolent crimes.?

· On the War in Iraq: “It’s now incontrovertible that our own government misled us into starting a war with Iraq. It’s also now incontrovertible that this was a huge mistake. Didn’t we learn anything from Vietnam and the Gulf of Tonkin??

· On gas prices: “We must cut our oil imports and begin using clean energy alternatives such as biofuels, hydrogen cells, solar power, wind power and geothermal power as a substitute for oil.?

Admittedly, Barkley does pepper his campaign platform with a few examples of that libertarian streak (beyond the overlap with the war on drugs position above) that once helped to define the Independence Party:

· On the drinking age: “18-year-old citizens of the United States should be given all legal rights of adulthood. If they can vote, join the military, and fight our wars, they certainly have earned the right to legally have a beer.?

· On the 2nd Amendment: “I believe that the second amendment to our Constitution is as important as any of the others. I believe that all law abiding citizens have the right to own and bear arms.?

But it is evident from the HHH/MPR poll that Franken and Barkley are largely going to fight over the same slice of the electoral pie: liberals and disgruntled moderates. In an election for which the Republican incumbent does not have a track record of being unpopular statewide (Coleman’s job approval numbers have outweighed his disapproval numbers in 41 of 42 public polls since 2003), Barkley’s presence in the U.S. Senate race was probably at the bottom of the Franken campaign ‘wish list’ this year.

Previous post: HHH/MPR Survey: Obama Up By 10 in Minnesota
Next post: Obama-Biden: Familiar Bedfellows...Though You'd Never Know It

3 Comments


  • Barkley is more closley aligned with Coleman as they both pay their taxes and Al Franken does not.

  • You forgot to mention that Al Franken is also hurting Al Franken's chances to win.


    In polling, they ask only "likely" voters what they think. If I stop voting because I don't like any of the partisan candidates, then I suppose your argument works. A larger percentage would vote for partisans if they have no choice or stop voting. But what you propose isn't very democratic. People should vote for who they believe in, not based on party or who might win.


    If a vote for Barkley is a vote for Coleman, then who should I vote for so it counts for Barkley? I'd like to know soon, especially if he wins the IP primary. ( Though I will be voting for Jack Uldrich ) Then I can campaign for them to help spread a message about the important issues facing us that no one in the major parties likes to address.

  • Don't discount Minnesota's libertarian streak. There are a lot of Democrats and Republians in the state that lean more libertarian than R's and D's in most states. Also, the independent base has a very strong Libertarian streak. This is the state that elected Jesse Ventura; and lest we forget Jesse Ventura was very libertarian. My prediction is that when Barkley gets in the debates he's going to look pretty appealing to a whole lot of voters. And I'm going to go out on a limb and say that I think he's probably going to come from behind and win the whole damn thing. I hate to say this, being that I'm a Franken guy.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Which States Have the Longest and Shortest Election Day Voting Hours?

    Residents in some North Dakota towns have less than half as many hours to cast their ballots as those in New York State.

    Political Crumbs

    No 100-Year Curse for Roberts

    Defeating his Tea Party primary challenger Milton Wolf with just 48.1 percent of the vote, Pat Roberts narrowly escaped becoming the first elected U.S. Senator from Kansas to lose a renomination bid in 100 years. The last - and so far only - elected U.S. Senator to lose a Kansas primary was one-term Republican Joseph Bristow in 1914. Bristow was defeated by former U.S. Senator Charles Curtis who went on to win three terms before becoming Herbert Hoover's running mate in 1928. Only one other U.S. Senator from the Sunflower State has lost a primary since the passage of the 17th Amendment: Sheila Frahm in 1996. Frahm was appointed to fill Bob Dole's seat earlier that year and finished 13.2 points behind Sam Brownback in the three-candidate primary field. Overall, incumbent senators from Kansas have won 29 times against two defeats in the direct vote era. (Curtis also lost a primary in 1912 to Walter Stubbs, one year before the nation moved to direct elections).


    The Second Time Around

    Former Republican Congressman Bob Beauprez became the seventh major party or second place gubernatorial candidate in Colorado to get a second chance at the office when he narrowly won his party's nomination last month. Two of the previous six candidates were successful. Democrat Alva Adams lost his first gubernatorial bid to Benjamin Eaton in 1884, but was victorious two years later against William Meyer. Democrat Charles Johnson placed third in 1894 behind Republican Albert McIntyre and Populist incumbent Governor David Waite but returned as the Fusion (Democrat/Populist) nominee in 1898 and defeated GOPer Henry Wolcott. Gubernatorial candidates who received a second chance but lost both general elections include Democrat Thomas Patterson (1888, 1914), Progressive Edward Costigan (1912, 1914), Republican Donald Brotzman (1954, 1956), and Republican David Strickland (1978, 1986).


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting