Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Why Dean Barkley Is Hurting Al Franken's U.S. Senate Chances

Bookmark and Share

A new U.S. Senate poll released today by the Humphrey Institute and Minnesota Public Radio finds Norm Coleman and Al Franken virtually deadlocked in the Gopher State’s U.S. Senate race.

While Franken’s statistically insignificant 41 to 40 percent lead in the poll comes as a bit of a surprise – Franken had only been measured with a lead in 1 of the previous 17 public polls dating back to February 2008 – what should not come as a surprise to either campaign is the 8 percent support currently amassed by former Senator and likely Independence Party primary winner Dean Barkley.

The Coleman-Franken battle has been one of the most expensive and brutal U.S. Senate races in recent years nationwide. In a state where ‘Minnesota nice’ still has some meaning, it is only natural that some voters who are disgusted with the Coleman and Franken attacks, and the hate-filled diatribes ideologues have littered across the blogs, will gravitate to a third party – especially in a state that is not shy about supporting third parties.

The Independence Party and Barkley backers will insist they are not ‘stealing’ votes from anyone, especially Franken. In a democracy, this is, of course, technically true – no vote is ‘owned’ by any candidate or political party. IP supporters will thus likely tout Barkley’s demeanor and credentials (as well as the Gopher State’s independent streak) for any support he receives.

This may have been true once upon a time, when Independent Party candidates were more closely aligned with the GOP or had a reputation for being ‘true independents.’ In fact, a recent study by Smart Politics of state House races found the DFL to be the beneficiary of IP candidates getting on the ballot.

But recent statewide campaigns by 2006 Gubernatorial IP nominee Peter Hutchinson and Barkley in 2008 reveal the Independence Party’s policy positions on many issues to be near carbon-copies of the DFL. As a result, in the 2008 U.S. Senate race, the HHH/MPR study finds Barkley is:

…Competing with Franken for the angry voter who disapproves of Bush and sees the country as off on the wrong track. Franken is only winning 51% of Minnesotans who are concerned that the country is off-track and Barkley is a major reason that the Democrat is not getting even more disaffected Minnesotans -- he is drawing 9% of these voters. A similar story is evident with regard to Minnesotans who disapprove of Coleman and Bush: Barkley is diverting 9% of these critics -- voters that might otherwise support Franken.?

A look at Barkley’s issue positions reveals, in fact, a significant overlap with modern Democratic Party values:

· On gay rights: “It’s long past time to acknowledge that the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution applies to all Americans, regardless of their sexual preference.?

· On the War on Drugs: “America’s vaunted “war on drugs? has been a costly and miserable failure. … All we have succeeded in doing is to create a huge criminal enterprise that thrives on supplying outlawed drugs, and a huge criminal population for essentially nonviolent crimes.?

· On the War in Iraq: “It’s now incontrovertible that our own government misled us into starting a war with Iraq. It’s also now incontrovertible that this was a huge mistake. Didn’t we learn anything from Vietnam and the Gulf of Tonkin??

· On gas prices: “We must cut our oil imports and begin using clean energy alternatives such as biofuels, hydrogen cells, solar power, wind power and geothermal power as a substitute for oil.?

Admittedly, Barkley does pepper his campaign platform with a few examples of that libertarian streak (beyond the overlap with the war on drugs position above) that once helped to define the Independence Party:

· On the drinking age: “18-year-old citizens of the United States should be given all legal rights of adulthood. If they can vote, join the military, and fight our wars, they certainly have earned the right to legally have a beer.?

· On the 2nd Amendment: “I believe that the second amendment to our Constitution is as important as any of the others. I believe that all law abiding citizens have the right to own and bear arms.?

But it is evident from the HHH/MPR poll that Franken and Barkley are largely going to fight over the same slice of the electoral pie: liberals and disgruntled moderates. In an election for which the Republican incumbent does not have a track record of being unpopular statewide (Coleman’s job approval numbers have outweighed his disapproval numbers in 41 of 42 public polls since 2003), Barkley’s presence in the U.S. Senate race was probably at the bottom of the Franken campaign ‘wish list’ this year.

Previous post: HHH/MPR Survey: Obama Up By 10 in Minnesota
Next post: Obama-Biden: Familiar Bedfellows...Though You'd Never Know It

3 Comments


  • Barkley is more closley aligned with Coleman as they both pay their taxes and Al Franken does not.

  • You forgot to mention that Al Franken is also hurting Al Franken's chances to win.


    In polling, they ask only "likely" voters what they think. If I stop voting because I don't like any of the partisan candidates, then I suppose your argument works. A larger percentage would vote for partisans if they have no choice or stop voting. But what you propose isn't very democratic. People should vote for who they believe in, not based on party or who might win.


    If a vote for Barkley is a vote for Coleman, then who should I vote for so it counts for Barkley? I'd like to know soon, especially if he wins the IP primary. ( Though I will be voting for Jack Uldrich ) Then I can campaign for them to help spread a message about the important issues facing us that no one in the major parties likes to address.

  • Don't discount Minnesota's libertarian streak. There are a lot of Democrats and Republians in the state that lean more libertarian than R's and D's in most states. Also, the independent base has a very strong Libertarian streak. This is the state that elected Jesse Ventura; and lest we forget Jesse Ventura was very libertarian. My prediction is that when Barkley gets in the debates he's going to look pretty appealing to a whole lot of voters. And I'm going to go out on a limb and say that I think he's probably going to come from behind and win the whole damn thing. I hate to say this, being that I'm a Franken guy.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Gender Equality in the US House: A State-by State Quarter-Century Report Card (1989-2014)

    A study of 5,325 congressional elections finds the number of female U.S. Representatives has more than tripled over the last 25 years, but the rate at which women are elected to the chamber still varies greatly between the states.

    Political Crumbs

    Small Club in St. Paul

    Mark Dayton is one of just three Minnesotans ever elected to three different statewide offices. Dayton, of course, had previously served as State Auditor (1991-1995) and U.S. Senator (2001-2007) before winning the governorship in 2010. At that time, he joined Republicans Edward Thye and J.A.A. Burnquist on this very short list. Burnquist was elected governor in 1914 but then became governor after the death of Democrat Winfield Hammond in 1915. He then won the gubernatorial elections of 1916 and 1918 and eight terms as attorney general two decades later (1939-1955). Thye was similarly first elected lieutenant governor of the Gopher State and became governor after the resignation of fellow GOPer Harold Stasson in 1943. Thye won one additional full term as governor in 1944 and then two terms to the U.S. Senate (1947-1959). Twenty Minnesotans have been elected to two different statewide offices.


    Respect Your Elders?

    With retirement announcements this year by veteran U.S. Representatives such as 30-term Democrat John Dingell of Michigan, 20-term Democrat George Miller of California, and 18-term Republican Tom Petri of Wisconsin, it is no surprise that retirees from the 113th Congress are one of the most experienced cohorts in recent decades. Overall, these 24 exiting members of the House have served an average of 11.0 terms - the second longest tenure among retirees across the last 18 cycles since 1980. Only the U.S. Representatives retiring in 2006 had more experience, averaging 11.9 terms. (In that cycle, 10 of the 11 retiring members served at least 10 terms, with GOPer Bill Jenkins of Tennessee the lone exception at just five). Even without the aforementioned Dingell, the average length of service in the chamber of the remaining 23 retirees in 2014 is 10.2 terms - which would still be the third highest since 1980 behind the 2006 and 2012 (10.5 terms) cycles.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting