Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Economic Concerns Nothing New to Upper Midwesterners

Bookmark and Share

While sometimes it is difficult to get Democrats and Republicans to agree on anything, the economic concerns facing the nation are at the forefront of the minds of the electorate for both major political parties in the Upper Midwest and across the country. In fact, public opinion has not been so unified in the past decade on the top problem facing this nation, other than the months following the terrorist attacks in September 2001.

However, while Barack Obama may be enjoying a bump in the polls partially as a result of the newfound focus on the economy, this does not guarantee him a victory in November.

In Iowa, for example, several polls conducted the eve of the 2004 election found economic concerns to be the top issue for Iowans in their vote choice. A CNN / USA Today / Gallup poll ending the week before the election found the economy to be the most important issue (32 percent), followed by Iraq (27 percent) and the war on terrorism (22 percent). A Fox News survey of Iowans ending October 31st had similar findings: the economy led the way at 21 percent, followed by terrorism and the war in Iraq at 19 percent each. Despite these economic concerns, George W. Bush defeated Democrat John Kerry in the Hawkeye State.

In fact, economic concerns are not new to the Upper Midwest – they have been on the minds of voters in Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin for several years.

· In August 2003, a KCCI-TV / Research 2000 poll found the economy to be the top national problem among Iowans by nearly a 2:1 margin over taxes and homeland security.

· The economy was listed as the top issue among Minnesotans in their vote choice for national office in all three Pioneer Press / MPR surveys conducted in May, July, and September 2004.

· A late October 2004 poll by Wisconsin Public Radio / St. Norbert College found the economy to be the top concern among Wisconsinites as well, edging the war in Iraq by a 23 to 21 percent margin. A pair of Humphrey Institute surveys of the Badger State conducted in July and October 2004 confirmed these findings, with the economy leading the pace as the top national concern in Wisconsin.

Despite these pressing economic issues facing voters back in 2004, John Kerry lost Iowa and was only able to eke out narrow wins in the Badger State (0.4 points) and Gopher State (3.5 points).

Of course, the advantage for Obama in 2008, presuming he presents himself well on economic issues during the forthcoming debates, is a question of scale: the number of Upper Midwesterners citing economic concerns is about double that from Election 2004. In Iowa, 60 percent of likely voters say the economy is the most important issue facing the next President, compared with 55 percent in Minnesota (SurveyUSA, September 2008). Quinnipiac’s latest survey finds 55 percent of Minnesotans and 51 percent of Wisconsinites stating the economy will be the single most important issue in their vote choice in the November election.

Previous post: Commentary: Race and the 2008 Presidential Election
Next post: Weekend Upper Midwestern Presidential Poll Roundup

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting