Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


What Will We Learn From the Minnesota U.S. Senate Primaries?

Bookmark and Share

As several polls show a tight race between Norm Coleman and Al Franken heading into the Minnesota U.S. Senate primary, the campaigns – and the media – will be looking for clues as to which candidate is in the stronger position coming out of the primaries heading into the home stretch.

Both candidates are having trouble locking in the independent vote, but Tuesday’s primary will seek to provide a measure of how each has solidified their base.

Coleman is only being challenged by one candidate – the infamous Jack Shepard – who also challenged Coleman back in 2002. Shepherd received 5.6 percent of the vote in that primary, so that will be the baseline measure analysts can look to in judging Coleman’s success on Primary Day. (Assuming, arguendo, that Franken supporters do not cross over and vote for Shepherd to deflate Coleman’s victory margin).

Franken, meanwhile, will face six opponents in the DFL primary, including Priscilla Lord Farris, who has purchased media spots in recent weeks.

Some (right-wing) bloggers have suggested Franken also needs to nab 90 percent of the vote to demonstrate he has the support of the DFL heading into the last two months of the campaign.

On its surface, this sounds reasonable: Five of the six major party U.S. Senate candidates in the 2000, 2002, and 2006 elections received between 89 and 94 percent of the primary vote. However, each of those candidates (Rod Grams, Paul Wellstone, Norm Coleman, Amy Klobuchar, and Mark Kennedy) only faced 1 or 2 primary challengers.

While Franken should receive a larger share of the primary vote than Mark Dayton in 2000 (a plurality victory of 41 percent), that is perhaps a closer parallel as Dayton faced 7 primary challengers. The difference in 2000, however, is that three of those DFL candidates (Mike Ciresi, Jerry Janezich, and Rebecca Yanisch) ran high profile campaigns stretching back several months. Of the six DFL-ers facing off against Franken, only Lord Farris has gained media traction.

It is also difficult to measure the Franken vs. Coleman momentum solely based on voter turnout in their respective primaries. As Smart Politics documented last month, only 17 percent of Minnesota voters cast primary ballots in years in which gubernatorial races are not at stake. Still, voter enthusiasm was evident in 2006 when Klobuchar received 155,486 more votes than did Kennedy on Primary Day (in a gubernatorial election year) – a telling sign of what was to come that November.

Previous post: Eight Debate Questions Sarah Palin Does Not Want Asked of Her
Next post: McCain / Palin Bounce Boosting Republicans Down the Ballot

Leave a comment


Remains of the Data

Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

Political Crumbs

Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


more POLITICAL CRUMBS

Humphrey School Sites
CSPG
Humphrey New Media Hub

Issues />

<div id=
Abortion
Afghanistan
Budget and taxes
Campaign finances
Crime and punishment
Economy and jobs
Education
Energy
Environment
Foreign affairs
Gender
Health
Housing
Ideology
Immigration
Iraq
Media
Military
Partisanship
Race and ethnicity
Reapportionment
Redistricting
Religion
Sexuality
Sports
Terrorism
Third parties
Transportation
Voting