Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Election Profile: Wisconsin's 4th Congressional District (2008)

Bookmark and Share

Smart Politics is running a series of election profiles of all the Upper Midwestern U.S. Senate and U.S. House races leading up to the November 4th elections. The series will culminate with Smart Politics' official projections. The twelfth profile in the series is Wisconsin's 4th Congressional District race.

Candidates:
Democrat: Gwendolynne Moore (2-term incumbent)
Independent: Michael D. LaForest

District Geography:
Wisconsin's 4th Congressional District comprises the bulk of Milwaukee County including the cities of Cudahay, Milwaukee, St. Francis, South Milwaukee, West Allis, and West Milwaukee.

History:
In 2004 Moore won her inaugural U.S. House race by 41.4 points to fill the seat vacated by 11-term Democratic congressman Gerald Kleczka. In 2006, Moore won by 42.9 points in this urban, Democratic stronghold. Milwaukee's 4th District has voted for the Democratic Party in every U.S. House election since 1948, with an average margin of victory of approximately 50 points since 1960. Republicans have carried the district just two times since 1932 (1938 and 1946).

Republicans have failed to even field a candidate in more than one-third of the U.S. races in the 4th District since 1976 (6 of 17), including 2008. The only other name on the ballot this year is Independent candidate Michael D. LaForest.

Outlook:
Some congressional districts are so tilted red or blue that it is no wonder opposition parties face difficulties even in fielding a candidate - like the GOP in the 4th District. A Republican candidate has come within single-digits of beating a Democrat in the 4th District just one time since 1948 (Tom Reynolds, losing by 8.9 points during the Republican Revolution of 1994). The strongest showing by an independent or third party candidate during that span is 13.0 percent (by the Green Party in 2002; no Republicans were on the ballot in that contest).

Previous post: HHH / MPR News Poll – Obama Propelled by Financial Crisis and VP Debate
Next post: Live Blog: Dean Barkley on Political Polarization

5 Comments


  • I am writing to inform you that there is, in fact, a Republican running for Congress in Wisconsin's 4th district this coming general election. Unfortunately he entered the race too late for him to get on the ballot officially. His name is Dan Sebring and he is a regular citizen who is sick and tired of Gwen Moore pretending to work for Milwaukee and is instead lining her own pockets with taxpayers money. His website can be found at dansebringforcongress.com

    Although Dan is only a write in for this coming election, he plans to run again in 2010 as an official candidate against Gwen Moore. She has a more than shady past (going back long before her son was convicted of slashing tires on Republican funded "get out and vote" vans), and local constituents have been bribed with things like Whopper coupons to go out and vote for her.

    Those of us who live and work in Milwaukee have had enough of her kind of "politics".

  • My vote did not count the first time, the super delegated determined it. California, Washington, Oregons vote didn't count because the win came before in electorial college, so why did they vote. I won't vote again until there is a fair vote in this undemocratic country. Sandra fleischman.

  • I am writing to inform you all that myself a member of the independent american party is also running for congress in 2010 as well. I believe it is time to make a difference in our country and state. Change must come to make things better. Milwaukee and the several surrounding areas need a leader not a politician. It is time to make a change..."let's make it better 2010". Goodluck to all the runners...the best we can do is run then we have done all that we can.

    www.usiap.org

  • Check out this new press release posted yesterday about Dan Sebring

  • To whom it may concern: Looking for a job soon, like around November 4th 2010, with double digit unemployment it may be hard. The Anointed one has led many in his flock to a political abyss. He truly is an egomaniac, and has you for us to take it out on. We will stop our renegade employees one way, or the other. The U.S. Conservative Christians have sixteen Democrats in their sites, the 9/12ers, God knows how many we’ll take down, the NRA, FAIR, and the list goes on. The bishops, with, oh, twenty percent of the Christian population angry over this “choice” matter, people, things are not looking too good. You can go down, or scrap the whole idea. Co-op’s require funding to start, they could be made to fail, and the “Government Option” would rise. “WE THE PEOPLE”, who should concern you, we all were born on a yesterday, but not the day before this one. You underestimate us; we are not the Astroturf that you think. We will not to be broken down, melted, then turned into child proof objects, which I’m sure would be required for your safety. To bad you won’t have nothing to manipulate, then disregard during the interim. You may succeed; if not by sixty, reconciliation could be a bad option. We have no voice in your administration. Thou are numbers overwhelm that of yours, it seems of no consequence. You follow the path to ruin, not only your chosen destruction, but that of an entire nation. We will not follow in your footsteps, we can turn to contempt and disregard, weather the consequences, and wait for real “CHANGE” that is Constitutional, and moral.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Which States Own the Best Track Record in Backing Eventual GOP Presidential Nominees?

    Nine states (each with primaries) have an unblemished record in voting for the eventual Republican nominee since 1976 - and not all host contests on the back end of the calendar.

    Political Crumbs

    Evolving?

    When Scott Walker "punted" back in February after being asked if he was comfortable with the idea of evolution he added, "That's a question a politician shouldn't be involved in one way or the other." However, it may very well be a question that is asked at one of the upcoming GOP debates this year. In South Carolina during the first GOP debate in 2012, FOX News' Juan Williams asked Tim Pawlenty, "Do you equate the teaching of creationism with the teaching of evolution as the basis for what should be taught for our nation's schools?" Pawlenty replied, "There should be room in the curriculum for study of intelligent design" but that it was up to the local school districts if it should be in a science class or comparative theory class. At the fourth Republican debate held in California, Jon Huntsman addressed the GOP becoming "anti-science" thusly: "Listen, when you make comments that fly in the face of what 98 out of 100 climate scientists have said, when you call into question the science of evolution, all I'm saying is that, in order for the Republican Party to win, we can't run from science. We can't run from mainstream conservative philosophy."


    73 Months and Counting

    January's preliminary Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show Minnesota's unemployment rate of 3.7 percent was once again lower than Wisconsin's 5.0 percent. That marks the 73rd consecutive month in which Minnesota has boasted a lower jobless rate than its neighbor to the east dating back to January 2009 including each of the last 67 months by at least one point. The Gopher State has now edged Wisconsin in the employment border battle for 204 of the last 216 months dating back to February 1997. Wisconsin only managed a lower unemployment rate than Minnesota for the 12 months of 2008 during this 18-year span.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting