Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Election Profile: Wisconsin's 4th Congressional District (2008)

Bookmark and Share

Smart Politics is running a series of election profiles of all the Upper Midwestern U.S. Senate and U.S. House races leading up to the November 4th elections. The series will culminate with Smart Politics' official projections. The twelfth profile in the series is Wisconsin's 4th Congressional District race.

Candidates:
Democrat: Gwendolynne Moore (2-term incumbent)
Independent: Michael D. LaForest

District Geography:
Wisconsin's 4th Congressional District comprises the bulk of Milwaukee County including the cities of Cudahay, Milwaukee, St. Francis, South Milwaukee, West Allis, and West Milwaukee.

History:
In 2004 Moore won her inaugural U.S. House race by 41.4 points to fill the seat vacated by 11-term Democratic congressman Gerald Kleczka. In 2006, Moore won by 42.9 points in this urban, Democratic stronghold. Milwaukee's 4th District has voted for the Democratic Party in every U.S. House election since 1948, with an average margin of victory of approximately 50 points since 1960. Republicans have carried the district just two times since 1932 (1938 and 1946).

Republicans have failed to even field a candidate in more than one-third of the U.S. races in the 4th District since 1976 (6 of 17), including 2008. The only other name on the ballot this year is Independent candidate Michael D. LaForest.

Outlook:
Some congressional districts are so tilted red or blue that it is no wonder opposition parties face difficulties even in fielding a candidate - like the GOP in the 4th District. A Republican candidate has come within single-digits of beating a Democrat in the 4th District just one time since 1948 (Tom Reynolds, losing by 8.9 points during the Republican Revolution of 1994). The strongest showing by an independent or third party candidate during that span is 13.0 percent (by the Green Party in 2002; no Republicans were on the ballot in that contest).

Previous post: HHH / MPR News Poll – Obama Propelled by Financial Crisis and VP Debate
Next post: Live Blog: Dean Barkley on Political Polarization

5 Comments


  • I am writing to inform you that there is, in fact, a Republican running for Congress in Wisconsin's 4th district this coming general election. Unfortunately he entered the race too late for him to get on the ballot officially. His name is Dan Sebring and he is a regular citizen who is sick and tired of Gwen Moore pretending to work for Milwaukee and is instead lining her own pockets with taxpayers money. His website can be found at dansebringforcongress.com

    Although Dan is only a write in for this coming election, he plans to run again in 2010 as an official candidate against Gwen Moore. She has a more than shady past (going back long before her son was convicted of slashing tires on Republican funded "get out and vote" vans), and local constituents have been bribed with things like Whopper coupons to go out and vote for her.

    Those of us who live and work in Milwaukee have had enough of her kind of "politics".

  • My vote did not count the first time, the super delegated determined it. California, Washington, Oregons vote didn't count because the win came before in electorial college, so why did they vote. I won't vote again until there is a fair vote in this undemocratic country. Sandra fleischman.

  • I am writing to inform you all that myself a member of the independent american party is also running for congress in 2010 as well. I believe it is time to make a difference in our country and state. Change must come to make things better. Milwaukee and the several surrounding areas need a leader not a politician. It is time to make a change..."let's make it better 2010". Goodluck to all the runners...the best we can do is run then we have done all that we can.

    www.usiap.org

  • Check out this new press release posted yesterday about Dan Sebring

  • To whom it may concern: Looking for a job soon, like around November 4th 2010, with double digit unemployment it may be hard. The Anointed one has led many in his flock to a political abyss. He truly is an egomaniac, and has you for us to take it out on. We will stop our renegade employees one way, or the other. The U.S. Conservative Christians have sixteen Democrats in their sites, the 9/12ers, God knows how many we’ll take down, the NRA, FAIR, and the list goes on. The bishops, with, oh, twenty percent of the Christian population angry over this “choice” matter, people, things are not looking too good. You can go down, or scrap the whole idea. Co-op’s require funding to start, they could be made to fail, and the “Government Option” would rise. “WE THE PEOPLE”, who should concern you, we all were born on a yesterday, but not the day before this one. You underestimate us; we are not the Astroturf that you think. We will not to be broken down, melted, then turned into child proof objects, which I’m sure would be required for your safety. To bad you won’t have nothing to manipulate, then disregard during the interim. You may succeed; if not by sixty, reconciliation could be a bad option. We have no voice in your administration. Thou are numbers overwhelm that of yours, it seems of no consequence. You follow the path to ruin, not only your chosen destruction, but that of an entire nation. We will not follow in your footsteps, we can turn to contempt and disregard, weather the consequences, and wait for real “CHANGE” that is Constitutional, and moral.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Which States Have the Longest and Shortest Election Day Voting Hours?

    Residents in some North Dakota towns have less than half as many hours to cast their ballots as those in New York State.

    Political Crumbs

    No 100-Year Curse for Roberts

    Defeating his Tea Party primary challenger Milton Wolf with just 48.1 percent of the vote, Pat Roberts narrowly escaped becoming the first elected U.S. Senator from Kansas to lose a renomination bid in 100 years. The last - and so far only - elected U.S. Senator to lose a Kansas primary was one-term Republican Joseph Bristow in 1914. Bristow was defeated by former U.S. Senator Charles Curtis who went on to win three terms before becoming Herbert Hoover's running mate in 1928. Only one other U.S. Senator from the Sunflower State has lost a primary since the passage of the 17th Amendment: Sheila Frahm in 1996. Frahm was appointed to fill Bob Dole's seat earlier that year and finished 13.2 points behind Sam Brownback in the three-candidate primary field. Overall, incumbent senators from Kansas have won 29 times against two defeats in the direct vote era. (Curtis also lost a primary in 1912 to Walter Stubbs, one year before the nation moved to direct elections).


    The Second Time Around

    Former Republican Congressman Bob Beauprez became the seventh major party or second place gubernatorial candidate in Colorado to get a second chance at the office when he narrowly won his party's nomination last month. Two of the previous six candidates were successful. Democrat Alva Adams lost his first gubernatorial bid to Benjamin Eaton in 1884, but was victorious two years later against William Meyer. Democrat Charles Johnson placed third in 1894 behind Republican Albert McIntyre and Populist incumbent Governor David Waite but returned as the Fusion (Democrat/Populist) nominee in 1898 and defeated GOPer Henry Wolcott. Gubernatorial candidates who received a second chance but lost both general elections include Democrat Thomas Patterson (1888, 1914), Progressive Edward Costigan (1912, 1914), Republican Donald Brotzman (1954, 1956), and Republican David Strickland (1978, 1986).


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting