Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Election Profile: Wisconsin's 4th Congressional District (2008)

Bookmark and Share

Smart Politics is running a series of election profiles of all the Upper Midwestern U.S. Senate and U.S. House races leading up to the November 4th elections. The series will culminate with Smart Politics' official projections. The twelfth profile in the series is Wisconsin's 4th Congressional District race.

Candidates:
Democrat: Gwendolynne Moore (2-term incumbent)
Independent: Michael D. LaForest

District Geography:
Wisconsin's 4th Congressional District comprises the bulk of Milwaukee County including the cities of Cudahay, Milwaukee, St. Francis, South Milwaukee, West Allis, and West Milwaukee.

History:
In 2004 Moore won her inaugural U.S. House race by 41.4 points to fill the seat vacated by 11-term Democratic congressman Gerald Kleczka. In 2006, Moore won by 42.9 points in this urban, Democratic stronghold. Milwaukee's 4th District has voted for the Democratic Party in every U.S. House election since 1948, with an average margin of victory of approximately 50 points since 1960. Republicans have carried the district just two times since 1932 (1938 and 1946).

Republicans have failed to even field a candidate in more than one-third of the U.S. races in the 4th District since 1976 (6 of 17), including 2008. The only other name on the ballot this year is Independent candidate Michael D. LaForest.

Outlook:
Some congressional districts are so tilted red or blue that it is no wonder opposition parties face difficulties even in fielding a candidate - like the GOP in the 4th District. A Republican candidate has come within single-digits of beating a Democrat in the 4th District just one time since 1948 (Tom Reynolds, losing by 8.9 points during the Republican Revolution of 1994). The strongest showing by an independent or third party candidate during that span is 13.0 percent (by the Green Party in 2002; no Republicans were on the ballot in that contest).

Previous post: HHH / MPR News Poll – Obama Propelled by Financial Crisis and VP Debate
Next post: Live Blog: Dean Barkley on Political Polarization

5 Comments


  • I am writing to inform you that there is, in fact, a Republican running for Congress in Wisconsin's 4th district this coming general election. Unfortunately he entered the race too late for him to get on the ballot officially. His name is Dan Sebring and he is a regular citizen who is sick and tired of Gwen Moore pretending to work for Milwaukee and is instead lining her own pockets with taxpayers money. His website can be found at dansebringforcongress.com

    Although Dan is only a write in for this coming election, he plans to run again in 2010 as an official candidate against Gwen Moore. She has a more than shady past (going back long before her son was convicted of slashing tires on Republican funded "get out and vote" vans), and local constituents have been bribed with things like Whopper coupons to go out and vote for her.

    Those of us who live and work in Milwaukee have had enough of her kind of "politics".

  • My vote did not count the first time, the super delegated determined it. California, Washington, Oregons vote didn't count because the win came before in electorial college, so why did they vote. I won't vote again until there is a fair vote in this undemocratic country. Sandra fleischman.

  • I am writing to inform you all that myself a member of the independent american party is also running for congress in 2010 as well. I believe it is time to make a difference in our country and state. Change must come to make things better. Milwaukee and the several surrounding areas need a leader not a politician. It is time to make a change..."let's make it better 2010". Goodluck to all the runners...the best we can do is run then we have done all that we can.

    www.usiap.org

  • Check out this new press release posted yesterday about Dan Sebring

  • To whom it may concern: Looking for a job soon, like around November 4th 2010, with double digit unemployment it may be hard. The Anointed one has led many in his flock to a political abyss. He truly is an egomaniac, and has you for us to take it out on. We will stop our renegade employees one way, or the other. The U.S. Conservative Christians have sixteen Democrats in their sites, the 9/12ers, God knows how many we’ll take down, the NRA, FAIR, and the list goes on. The bishops, with, oh, twenty percent of the Christian population angry over this “choice” matter, people, things are not looking too good. You can go down, or scrap the whole idea. Co-op’s require funding to start, they could be made to fail, and the “Government Option” would rise. “WE THE PEOPLE”, who should concern you, we all were born on a yesterday, but not the day before this one. You underestimate us; we are not the Astroturf that you think. We will not to be broken down, melted, then turned into child proof objects, which I’m sure would be required for your safety. To bad you won’t have nothing to manipulate, then disregard during the interim. You may succeed; if not by sixty, reconciliation could be a bad option. We have no voice in your administration. Thou are numbers overwhelm that of yours, it seems of no consequence. You follow the path to ruin, not only your chosen destruction, but that of an entire nation. We will not follow in your footsteps, we can turn to contempt and disregard, weather the consequences, and wait for real “CHANGE” that is Constitutional, and moral.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    Is There a Presidential Drag On Gubernatorial Elections?

    Only five of the 20 presidents to serve since 1900 have seen their party win a majority of gubernatorial elections during their administrations, and only one since JFK.

    Political Crumbs

    Strike Three for Miller-Meeks

    Iowa Republicans had a banner day on November 4th, picking up both a U.S. Senate seat and one U.S. House seat, but Mariannette Miller-Meeks' defeat in her third attempt to oust Democrat Dave Loebsack in the 2nd CD means the GOP will not have a monopoly on the state's congressional delegation in the 114th Congress. The loss by Miller-Meeks (following up her defeats in 2008 and 2010) means major party nominees who lost their first two Iowa U.S. House races are now 0 for 10 the third time around in Iowa history. Miller-Meeks joins Democrat William Leffingwell (1858, 1868, 1870), Democrat Anthony Van Wagenen (1894, 1912 (special), 1912), Democrat James Murtagh (1906, 1914, 1916), Democrat Clair Williams (1944, 1946, 1952), Democrat Steven Carter (1948, 1950, 1956), Republican Don Mahon (1966, 1968, 1970), Republican Tom Riley (1968, 1974, 1976), Democrat Eric Tabor (1986, 1988, 1990), and Democrat Bill Gluba (1982, 1988, 2004) on the Hawkeye State's Three Strikes list.


    Larry Pressler Wins the Silver

    Larry Pressler may have fallen short in his long-shot, underfunded, and understaffed bid to return to the nation's upper legislative chamber, but he did end up notching the best showing for a non-major party South Dakota U.S. Senate candidate in more than 90 years. Pressler won 17.1 percent of the vote which is the best showing for an independent or third party U.S. Senate candidate in the state since 1920 when non-partisan candidate Tom Ayres won 24.1 percent in a race won by Republican Peter Norbeck. Overall, Pressler's 17.1 percent is good for the second best mark for a non-major party candidate across the 35 U.S. Senate contests in South Dakota history. Independent and third party candidates have appeared on the South Dakota U.S. Senate ballot just 25 times over the last century and only three have reached double digits: Pressler in 2014 and Ayres in 1920 and 1924 (12.1 percent). Pressler's defeat means he won't become the oldest candidate elected to the chamber in South Dakota history nor notch the record for the longest gap in service in the direct election era.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting