Go to HHH home page.
Smart Politics
 


Humphrey Institute Candidate Forums: Minnesota's 3rd Congressional District

Bookmark and Share

The Center for the Study of Politics and Governance and the Graduate and Professional Student Assembly are cosponsoring a series of public forums with the major party candidates for Minnesota’s 3rd Congressional District to foster informed and substantive discussion of important matters of public policy. The forums create an opportunity for the candidates to rise above the talking points and fractious back-and-forth of the campaign to address the important policy challenges facing Minnesota and the country. It also creates a forum for students and citizens to listen and raise questions with the candidates. The events are free and open to the public.

Scheduled Forums:

Ashwin Madia (DFL)
“Green Technology, Green Power, and Greenbacks: A Plan to Protect our Environment and our Economy?
Monday, October 13, 2008
Noon - 1:15pm

Erik Paulsen (GOP)
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Noon - 1:15pm

David Dillon (IP)
“The Congressional Role in Creating the Next Long Term Economic Boom?
Friday, October 17, 2008
Noon - 1:15pm

Humphrey Forum
Hubert H. Humphrey Center
301 19th Ave S.,
Minneapolis, MN

Smart Politics will also be live blogging these events.

Update: Paulsen has decided on a topic for his speech: "Why we Need Forward Thinking Leaders to Solve the Economic Crisis"

Previous post: Election Profile: Wisconsin's 5th Congressional District (2008)
Next post: Election Profile: Wisconsin's 6th Congressional District (2008)

2 Comments


  • I find it interesting that Paulsen has no title for his speech....do you think he'll cry to the audience about negative advertising? The fact that he's getting out worked and out spent by Madia just goes to show how dedicated the volunteers for Madia are. With Ashwin, they make more calls and engage more voters daily than Paulsen touches or talks to in a week. Erik still has no sound policy on how to help fix the economy let alone balance the budget....his extension of tax credits for the wealthiest (over $250,000 a year) will cost $2.4 trillion and he has no plan on where the money will come from....if there's a way he could borrow it so our children and grandchildren have to pay it back with interest I'm sure that would be his answer. Madia is the only one talking about making the tough choices and balancing the budget. As he says, we will go at this line by line and dime by dime....a pragmatic approach to a very real problem. That's the type of leadership we need in Congress.

  • I find it interesting that Paulsen has no title for his speech....do you think he'll cry to the audience about negative advertising? The fact that he's getting out worked and out spent by Madia just goes to show how dedicated the volunteers for Madia are. With Ashwin, they make more calls and engage more voters daily than Paulsen touches or talks to in a week. Erik still has no sound policy on how to help fix the economy let alone balance the budget....his extension of tax credits for the wealthiest (over $250,000 a year) will cost $2.4 trillion and he has no plan on where the money will come from....if there's a way he could borrow it so our children and grandchildren have to pay it back with interest I'm sure that would be his answer. Madia is the only one talking about making the tough choices and balancing the budget. As he says, we will go at this line by line and dime by dime....a pragmatic approach to a very real problem. That's the type of leadership we need in Congress.

  • Leave a comment


    Remains of the Data

    No Free Passes: States With 2 Major Party Candidates in Every US House Race

    Indiana has now placed candidates from both major parties on the ballot in a nation-best 189 consecutive U.S. House races, with New Hampshire, Minnesota, Idaho, and Montana also north of 100 in a row.

    Political Crumbs

    Gubernatorial Highs and Lows

    Two sitting governors currently hold the record for the highest gubernatorial vote ever received in their respective states by a non-incumbent: Republican Matt Mead of Wyoming (65.7 percent in 2010) and outgoing GOPer Dave Heineman of Nebraska (73.4 percent in 2006). Republican Gary Herbert of Utah had not previously won a gubernatorial contest when he notched a state record 64.1 percent for his first victory in 2010, but was an incumbent at the time after ascending to the position in 2009 after the early departure of Jon Huntsman. Meanwhile, two sitting governors hold the record in their states for the lowest mark ever recorded by a winning gubernatorial candidate (incumbent or otherwise): independent-turned-Democrat Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island (36.1 percent in 2010) and Democrat Terry McAuliffe of Virginia (47.8 percent in 2013).


    An Idaho Six Pack

    Two-term Idaho Republican Governor Butch Otter only polled at 39 percent in a recent PPP survey of the state's 2014 race - just four points ahead of Democratic businessman A.J. Balukoff. Otter's low numbers reflect his own struggles as a candidate (witness his weak primary win against State Senator Russ Fulcher) combined with the opportunity for disgruntled Idahoans to cast their votes for one of four third party and independent candidates, who collectively received the support of 12 percent of likely voters: Libertarian John Bujak, the Constitution Party's Steve Pankey, and independents Jill Humble and Pro-Life (aka Marvin Richardson). The six candidate options in a gubernatorial race sets an all-time record in the Gem State across the 46 elections conducted since statehood. The previous high water mark of five candidates was reached in seven previous cycles: 1902, 1904, 1908, 1912, 1914, 1966, and 2010.


    more POLITICAL CRUMBS

    Humphrey School Sites
    CSPG
    Humphrey New Media Hub

    Issues />

<div id=
    Abortion
    Afghanistan
    Budget and taxes
    Campaign finances
    Crime and punishment
    Economy and jobs
    Education
    Energy
    Environment
    Foreign affairs
    Gender
    Health
    Housing
    Ideology
    Immigration
    Iraq
    Media
    Military
    Partisanship
    Race and ethnicity
    Reapportionment
    Redistricting
    Religion
    Sexuality
    Sports
    Terrorism
    Third parties
    Transportation
    Voting